It depends on your point of view. I (being a nonviolent type) do not think that this was the best option. Considering that the U.S shoved over 110,000 Japanese Americans into internment camps right after the bombing of pearl harbor, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki just over did it, and it killed 150,000 to 246,000 people. Actually immediately after the U.S bombed Japan, people from the U.S were sent to japan to help japan recover from this (if i may say) "EPIC" disaster. The U.S stayed in japan for a few years helping with the recovery of many Japanese.
The alternate view: Without the atomic bombing of Japan, the only other option - given the adamant position of the Japanese that surrender was unthinkable - was the invasion of Japan, in which the most conservative estimates projected 250,000 American and over 1,000,000 Japanese lives would be lost - and most of the Japanese lives would be civilians.
Truman
President Harry S. Truman made the decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan to end WW II
Harry S. Truman
This decision was made to avoid the higher casualties caused by an actual invasion .
The battle for Okinawa supported the decision to use the Atom bomb.
The US dropped the atomic bomb onto Japan on August 1945.
to the the war with Japan
we hope we have a good relationship with japan because if we don't they might come to the U.S and bomb us or hurt us.
yes
Hawaii.
no
The US dropped an atomic bomb on Japan