The classification of lines of evidence into four different types is quite arbitrary. One could as easily distinguish two types, or five, or ten, depending on the criteria used.
For instance: one might distinguish between evidence stemming from research in extant lifeforms on one hand, and from extinct lifeforms on the other. One might distinguish between genetic data and morphological data.
For information on various lines of evidence supporting evolutionary theory, see links below.
1. We have seen species change, and have even caused species to change by our own practices of animal breeding. In recent times we have seen the appearance of such things as antibiotic resistant bacteria and insecticide resistant insects; clearly, they have evolved. They were not always here.
2. In the development of the human embryo (or the embryo of another species) we see that the organism, as it grows from a single celled zygote to a fully developed fetus, goes through what appear to be evolutionary stages. At one point the embryo resembles a fish, having a tail and gills. This is a clear indication that earlier forms from which we evolved are still a part of human genetics.
3. Many species, including humans, have vestigial organs. We have the vermiform appendix, an organ which serves no purpose. More dramatically, whales have very tiny leg bones embedded within their bodies even though they never grow legs. We can find all sorts of residual features left over from earlier stages of evolution.
4. We can trace all sorts of connections, both physiological and biochemical, among different species. The various families and groups which species form, and the similarities within those groups, speak of shared descent and the process of evolution.
Fossil history
Geography
Embryology
and Anatomy
There is plenty of fossil records and observable speciation to provide evidence for Evolution. Within the scientific community there is little to no debate on whether evolution is wrong. No concrete evidence has been provided by anyone to dispute the claims of evolution since its formulation by Darwin, otherwise it would have been discarded through the scientific method.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------While the above is right, observation and scientific studies provide evidence and arguments to the theory.
Darwin's ObservationsThere is a variation of characteristics/traits within a populationTraits are passed from parent to offspring (heredity)Organisms produce more offspring that are able to survive (overproduction)Due to the lack of resources, some offspring may not survive
Observation of finches on the Galapagos Islands.
No. There was a rumor circulating that Darwin recanted evolution on his death bed, but that rumor has no foundation or plausible evidence. And even if Darwin ever had said such a thing, it would be meaningless. Galileo recanted is heliocentric theory, under pressure from a religious group. That in no way alters the fact the earth orbits the sun, and not the other way around.
First of all, evolution is a FACT not a theory. You must be referring to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by means of natural selection. There is no denying the fact that evolution happens, scientists just didn't know exactly how it worked until Darwin suggested one plausible scientific explanation which he called natural selection. Natural selection is simply the change in allele frequencies of an organism which results that organism becoming either better or worse suited to survive in its environment. Being better suited to survive means that the organism is more likely to pass on the beneficial genetic trait to it's offspring. Rather than asking for evidence which helps prove evolution, try looking for verifiable scientific evidence which disproves it. After all, science is not about making claims and looking for evidence to prove them, but rather generating hypothesis and looking for ways to disprove them.
Monkeys
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
Darwin .
None exists.
No. There is no real evidence about that
19th Century hypothesis: "That adaptations are chosen from enviremental factors meaning that you adapt to your surrondings" yet there are none evidence to support Darwin's evolution (hoax) even at 21st Century (over hundred years after monkey's death). Evolution = Never exist.
Scientists did not prove things then anymore than they prove things now. Evidence, masses of converging evidence support the theory of evolution by natural selection. Darwin, in his day, had much evidence to support his theory. All the way from artificial selection to island biogeography. Since that time the theory has moved on to where it is no longer just Darwin's theory, but modified and supported with so much evidence that the theory became the bedrock of biology. Go here. talkorigins.org
Darwin used the wide variation of beaks to support his theory of evolution. He speculated that all the different finches had descended from one species and were not different species.
Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace were the first to formulate a scientific argument for the theory of evolution by means of natural selection
the beaks were different on every island
It is based on evidence found in the world.
Darwin's best argument in favor of the theory of evolution was natural selection. The most serious objections came from religion.