answersLogoWhite

0

What are some amicus curiae of the fourth amendment?

Updated: 8/20/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Best Answer

The definition of Amicus Curiae is; Friend of the Court (i.e.: someone who brings to the courts attention some point of law or fact something which might otherwise have been overlooked).

For the remainder of your question: WikiAnswers will not do your homework for you. We will not conduct your research, write your discussion papers, critiques, or essays.

That is considered CHEATING.

If you have a specific question about the subject however, we are willing to assist.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are some amicus curiae of the fourth amendment?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is an amicus curiae?

Amicus curiae or friend of the court is someone who brings to the courts attention some point of law or fact something which would otherwise have been overlooked usually this would be a member of the bar and occasionally the law officers are asked or are allowed to argue a case in which they are not instructed to appear


What are Amicus Curiae briefs and who can file them?

The vehicle through which representatives of special interest groups are able to express opinions on matters before the Court is called an amicus curiae (pl. amici curiae), or "friend of the court" brief (or sometimes academic paper) related to questions of law or fact in the case at bar.The group or individual filing the brief is not a party to the case, and has no legal standing to participate in litigation, but has an interest in the outcome. Often, the amicus presents a point of law or of psychological or sociological relevance to the case.In order to be eligible to provide an amicus curiae, a person or group not party to the litigation under review, but who believes the Court's decision may affect its interest, may file if: 1) the brief is accompanied by written consent of all parties; or, 2) they file a motion for leave to submit amicus curiae to the Supreme Court, identifying why the "friend" has an interest in the case, and explaining the reasons the submission may be useful to the Court.The Court is under no obligation to grant permission, nor to read the brief. Acceptance or rejection is solely at the Court's discretion, except when amici are filed by the United States, a U.S. agency, State, Territory, or Commonwealth. These are automatically accepted.Rule 37(1) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States explains:"An amicus curiae brief that brings to the attention of the relevant matter not already brought to its attention by the parties may be of considerable help to the Court. An amicus curiae brief that does not serve this purpose burdens the Court, and its filing is generally not favored."At the request of chief counsel for either party, the Court may grant a motion of an amicus to participate in the oral argument. In this case, the Petitioner or Respondent (whichever is appropriate) must allocate part of his or her allotted 30 minutes for the amicus argument; the Court does not extend presentation time to accommodate additional speakers.(The last two paragraphs apply only to the Supreme Court of the United States.)Answer Normally, groups that have a financial, political, or philosophical reason to want the court to rule in a particular way in a given case ask the court for permission to file a brief as amicus curiae, and if the court grants permission then the group can do so.Answer In lower court cases, Amicus curiae or friend of the court is someone who brings to the courts attention some point of law or fact something which would otherwise have been overlooked. Usually this would be a member of the bar and occasionally the law officers are asked or are allowed to argue a case in which they are not instructed to appear.


What does the legal pharse mean friend of the court?

"amicus curiae" is a term from New Latin, meaning "friend of the court,"* and usually refers to an attorney not directly involved in the case either personally or professionally, and supposedly neither for the plaintiff nor for the defendant. However, this attorney usually represents someone or some group with an interest in the outcome, as when both pro choice and pro life groups hire attorneys to file briefs with the judge expounding on their point of view in a case of an individual suing a clinic, an insurance company, or a governmental agency regarding a particular instance involving abortion .The plural term is "amici curiae,"* when several attorneys enter the case in such a manner. They are often invited by the court, or apply to the court (the judge trying the case, really) for permission to do so.*Since "curiae" is itself the plural of "curia," Latin for "court," these phrases literally mean friend or friends of the courts; while "friend of the court" would literally be translated as "amicus curia," but virtually no judge or attorney cares enough about Latin grammar anymore to bother with this fine distinction.


Which amendment prohibita a police officer form entering your home with out a warrant?

The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure. However, there are many exceptions to the Fourth Amendment, some of which permit warrantless entry into a home.


How do special interest groups influence the making of the law?

they send letters to government officials (studyisland)Lobbying is the process of trying to influence government decisions, and usually carries the negative connotation of secret negotiations, bribes and exchanged favors. Special interest groups and other parties aren't able to lobby the Supreme Court Justices in the same way they lobby Congress because they don't have direct access to the Justices or their staff, and there is no ostensible incentive on the Court's part to accept outside viewpoints.The vehicle through which representatives of special interest groups are able to express opinions on matters before the Court is called an amicus curiae (pl. amici curiae), or "friend of the court" brief (or sometimes academic paper) related to questions of law or fact in the case at bar.In order to be eligible to provide an amicus curiae, a person or group not party to the litigation under review, but who believes the Court's decision may affect its interest, may file if: 1) the brief is accompanied by written consent of all parties; or, 2) they file a motion for leave to submit amicus curiae to the Supreme Court, identifying why the "friend" has an interest in the case, and explaining the reasons the submission may be useful to the Court.The Court is under no obligation to grant permission, nor to read the brief. Acceptance or rejection is solely at the Court's discretion, except when amici are filed by the United States, a U.S. agency, State, Territory, or Commonwealth. These are automatically accepted.Rule 37(1) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States explains:"An amicus curiae brief that brings to the attention of the relevant matter not already brought to its attention by the parties may be of considerable help to the Court. An amicus curiae brief that does not serve this purpose burdens the Court, and its filing is generally not favored."On very rare occasions, the Court may grant a motion of an amicus curiae to participate in the oral argument.


Does the fourth amendment apply to some or all electronic communications?

The 4th amendment to the US Constitution relates to "search and seizure." how this applies to the qustion that was asked is unclear. For a discussion of this amendment, see the below link:


What makes Katz v. United States important?

It changed how the Fourth Amendment was interpreted.Prior to Katz a physical intrusion into some protected space was required before the Fourth Amendment was violated. In Katz the majority ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. They ruled that Mr. Katz had a "reasonable expectation of privacy" inside an enclosed phone booth; and that the Fourth Amendment had been violated since the police did not have a search warrant to listen in and record his conversation.The citation is Katz v. United States, 389 US 347 (1967).


voting and the twenty fourth amendment ?

After the Civil War, some southern states created poll taxes — or fees charged in order to vote — as a way to bypass the Fifteenth Amendment. Since many African American citizens could not afford to pay the tax, they were unable to vote. The Twenty-Fourth Amendment outlawed poll taxes in federal elections.


Want are some of the products and services offered by Amicus?

Amicus is a British trade union, the largest private sector union in fact, and formed by the mergers of several other smaller unions in 2001. Primarily left wing, Amicus was afilliated with New Labour and the Irish Labour Party.


Why would you be against the fourth amendment?

The 4th amendment protects you against illegal search and seizure. There are times when such activities can provide additional security for the community. Parts of the current Patriot Act allow law enforcement officials to search email and phone conversations. Some believe that this is eroding the protection of the 4th amendment.


How has Obama added or done away with the fourth amendment and why?

It is a myth that President Obama has "done away with" the fourth amendment, or any other amendments for that matter. While people on talk shows love to say inflammatory things like that, the fact remains that NO president can "do away with" an amendment. The constitution can only be amended by a law that is passed by congress, and then it must then be ratified by the states. The fourth amendment, about unreasonable searches and seizures, is certainly one that many Americans are concerned about: for example, some people feel the government has expanded spying on its citizens since 9/11. Further, there is evidence that in some cities, citizens are being racially profiled and stopped by law enforcement for no reason other than the color of their skin. But here again, while it is easy to blame the president (whoever the president may be), there is no credible evidence that Mr. Obama opposes the fourth amendment, nor that he personally believes that citizens should have their rights diminished.


What is the Latin 'amicus dilectus' in English?

"The special (male) friend," "special(male) friend" or "a special (male) friend" may be English equivalents of "amicus dilectus."Latin has no definite ("the") or indefinite ("some") articles. The masculine singular noun "amicus" means "friend." The masculine singular adjective "dilectus" means "special."The pronunciation in the liturgical Latin of the Church and the classical Latin of the ancient Romans is the same: "ah-MEE-koos dee-LEHK-toos."