0
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you use the word countervail in a sentence?
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
What are the six arguments a defense attorney can use as a defense against a criminal indictment?
cross contaminated evidence...
How is DNA use as Evidence?
They compare the DNA of those found at the scene of the crime against any suspect. This can be achieved by using Electrophoresis.
Does the use of DNA testing support or weaken the arguments against the death penalty?
The use of DNA testing can support arguments against the death penalty as it has revealed cases of wrongful convictions, highlighting flaws and errors in the criminal justice system. It underscores the possibility of irreversible mistakes, making the argument that the risk of executing an innocent person is too high. DNA testing has helped exonerate individuals on death row, strengthening the case against capital punishment.
Why do writer's use evidence in their writing?
They use evidence to support their arguments.
How did the speaker address arguments and counterarguments?
A speaker addresses arguments and counterarguments by providing his or her own arguments. The speaker will have to provide evidence that supports his or her own arguments.
Arguments against endangered species?
try doing some reseach on arguments against it then reverse it
Arguments for an against genetic testing?
DNA is a fact of life, you can argue its uses but not itself
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
Inductive arguments are those supposedly supported by good, but not conclusive, evidence. The idea of conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with deductive arguments, whereas the idea of less than conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with inductive arguments. Inductive arguments are based on probability; if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
What are arguments of DNA fingerprinting?
that is is good because it can solve many murders and serve justice to those bad because it may be used to discriminate against people with inferior genetics.
What are the major arguments against planning?
There are no real, good arguments against planning. Having a plan is important in many cases.
