Humans have no biological need to consume the flesh or secretions of other animals. If we can live well without hurting others, why wouldn't we?
Pros: less suffering for animals, humans, and the earth.
Cons: none of any significance.
Cons
animal rights have pros and cons.........for example....... Pros Cons 1. Animals are Gods's creation 1. They are carnivores 2. They have as much rights as humans 2. Some are very protective they cause most will protect you!! will hurt others to protect their 3.They are rare and they have lives just own! like us!! Get it.............Got it..............GOOD! Get it.......Got it..........GOOD!!! ---- * Well about 1.3 billion people worldwide depend on animals as a profitable and efficient source of food and income. Poor people or animals? * 800 million people go to bed hungry everyday, grazing animals such as cows are our only way of converting grass fiber into usagable energy. Hungry people or animals? * Millions of people are still deprived of their basic rights and animal rights activists wish to extend those same rights to animals. Rights for people or animals? * Trillions are invested in livestock related infostructur, good luck convincing the rich and poor alike to throw it away. * Some pharmaceuticals can only be produced (or produced in sufficient quantities) with animals. Sick people or animals? * Animals will feel better, but humans will be harmed. * BUt of course the animals have to come before the people right? Cause we humans are bastr@$ worse than animals and we should punbish ourselves against our will.
First of all, "factory farming" is simply a phrase coined by animal rights activists to refer to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations or CAFO's. That said, there are both pros and cons to large-scale animal agriculture. Opponents of CAFO's argue that the practice is not good for the environment, it negatively affects people's health, and animals are treated inhumanely in these facilities.
Supporters of CAFO's say that they benefit both the farmers and the consumers economically and these large-scale operations are the best way to provide proper care for animals.
Pros
- Animals are treated more fairly.
- A more moral and just society.
- Animals would not be treated as cruelly
-Animal abusers get longer jail time
Cons
- PETA is a load o f crock. they use animals as a way to push an agenda of human hatred rather than love of animals.
- What are we going to do lock up bear for killing a fish??
- Animals cannot reason, so they cannot be accepted into society where they would roam free and Vote?
- Again PETA is crap
you get fat/thin
yup
Pros: provides minerals we need to make things for our everyday life Cons: It can destroy animal life
There are many cons of animal fighting, but no known pros. Cons include the needless pain caused to animals, the injuries, and the fear that these animals must face. They live a different and sad life.
Pro: living organism model Con: violates the animal's rights inefficient and ineffective, their anatomy and biological reactions are not the same (look up the thalidomide tragedy)
Honestly, I don't think that their is any pros on animal abuse..... I'm doing a paper for school and I need pros and cons to back up my argument that animal abuse is wrong, I have tons of pros but no cons :( (so i need facts that animal abuse is right) websites would be appreciated also because I need books and websites listed for my sources and they need to be CREDIBLE resources! Thanks all help is appreciated (ill get back on soon!) :) thanks oh and HELP ME PLEASE!
pros and cons of physiocrats
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
pros are + and cons are-
pros: goodness cons: badness
gm insulin is specific to humans unlike animal insulin which is specific to that animal
PROS CONS ----------------------------------------------------- Pros: Entertaining Cons: Mental conditions can be caused, Adicition, Expensive.