Apostrophes have very few rules, yet they remain one of the most abused forms of punctuation.
The two primary reasons to use an apostrophe are within:contractionspossessivesI can't believe John's collection was stolen.
When you select it, it removes every apostrophe in the story.
A contraction is made of two words with an apostrophe. Note the apostrophe replaces a letter.
The contraction of 'will not' is won't.
You only use an apostrophe in it's when it is a contraction of it is. If you are using ITS to describe something belonging to IT, such as "It was wagging its tail," then the tail belongs to it and so its does not have an apostrophe.
The two primary reasons to use an apostrophe are within:contractionspossessivesI can't believe John's collection was stolen.
When you select it, it removes every apostrophe in the story.
If the plural noun has possession, indicate it by using an apostrophe after the S.
No, only use an apostrophe when using a contraction or a possessive
A contraction is made of two words with an apostrophe. Note the apostrophe replaces a letter.
The contraction of 'will not' is won't.
You only use an apostrophe in it's when it is a contraction of it is. If you are using ITS to describe something belonging to IT, such as "It was wagging its tail," then the tail belongs to it and so its does not have an apostrophe.
A noun that shows ownership using an apostrophe is a possessive noun.
No, unless your name has an apostrophe in it or you are using it in the possessive.
It is indicated by using an apostrophe.
If you are indicating possession (Achilles' heal) use an apostrophe at the end of the word. If you are simply stating his name, there is no apostrophe.
It is an apostrophe that is used in a word like couldn't. Instead of could not you use an apostrophe to make it in to couldn't and that is how is used. It can also be used with numbers, like for example 1954 using an apostrophe like this '54 makes it an apostrophe that shows contraction.