answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Ogden's attorneys argued:

  • The Court should interpret "commerce" narrowly.
  • New York, as a sovereign state, was entitled to regulate commerce within its borders.
  • New York had the right to grant Ogden an exclusive legal franchise in Hudson Bay and New York Harbor, which were both under the purview of the state.
  • Anyone who wanted to operate a steamboat in New York water had to pay for the privilege.
  • New York laws did not interfere with the federal government's right to regulate commerce.
  • New York and the federal government had concurrent power over commerce.

Case Citation:

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Gibbons' attorneys argued:

  • Gibbons' boats were properly enrolled and licensed by the federal government, pursuant to a Congressional Act, "An act for enrolling and licensing ships and vessels to be employed in the coasting trade and fisheries, and for regulating the same" (1793).
  • The federal license included the disputed area between Elizabethtown and New York City.
  • New York's state laws were repugnant to the US Constitution (unconstitutional).
  • The Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause authorized Congress to regulate commerce between states.
  • The Constitution authorized Congress to promote the progress of science and useful arts.

Case Citation:

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What argument did Ogden use to support his license to operate steamboats?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which element is needed for a sound argument?

Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.


Which does a speaker use to make a sound argument?

Evidence to support the argument.


Which does a speaker use to create a sound argument?

evidence to support the argument


What is active support for a cause?

Advocacy- Active Support or argument for a cause


In writing What should an argument do?

An argument should explain and support the point that you are trying to make.


What is the purpose of an argument's conclusion?

Answer this question… To restate the central point of the argument and make a final bid for the audience's support


When was The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God created?

The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God was created in 1763.


What argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to prove its conclusion?

Inductive argumentInductive Argument


What purpose does the conclusion of an argument serve?

To make a final bid for support by restating the central point of the argument. (APEX)


What is a counter argument?

An argument (thesis,idea or theory) which is opposite to one already proposed. A counterargument is an argument, with factual evidence or other kinds of support, that challenges either your thesis or a major argument for it.


What is testamonial?

mentions exports and important people to support the argument


How do you discern the author's argument in a text?

To discern the author's argument in a text, look for the main thesis or central claim that the author is trying to prove or support. Pay attention to key points, evidence, and reasoning presented by the author to support their argument. Analyze the tone and language used to convey the argument effectively.