When Antarctica was still a part of the super continent Gondwana, it was covered in forests and had warm coastal currents on its shores. As Antarctica separated from Gondwana and moved south, the waters cooled, the temperatures dropped, the forests disppeared, the land was covered in snow which was compacted into ice over time, all combining to create coal deposits.
The coal deposits in Antarctica are explained by Pangaea where Antarctica was located next to South America, Africa, Australia, and India.
Answer: Antarctica was in a warmer place before it drifted over the South Pole.
Continental Drift. The land mass wasn't always at the poles so could support forests that then got covered to become coal. Climate Change's another. Earth maybe WAS warm enough at the pole but the climate as a whole warm enough to support foorests there.
Because for the last 30 years scientistshave confirmed the existence of mantle plumes.Visual evidence.
deflate
The coal deposits in Antarctica are explained by Pangaea where Antarctica was located next to South America, Africa, Australia, and India.
Answer: Antarctica was in a warmer place before it drifted over the South Pole.
She believes in the existence of God. The existence of gravity is a fact.
You could say that Antarctica is on the southern side -- of earth, that is.
You could row in the seas around Antarctica, but you'd probably freeze to death.
We could try and help Antarctica by not poluting in the Atlantic Seas.
Anything and everything could be lost in Antarctica, as it is possible to lose anything and everything anywhere on earth.
Ice!
It was inhabited so that research could be done on Antarctica at a convenient location.
I don't think they need heat, but could you survive in Antarctica?
Yes, the edge of land on Antarctica could all be considered beaches.
This is a complex question, because a large number of arguments have been proposed, over the past several thousand years, supporting or opposing belief in God for many different reasons. The simplest and most often used argument is that the existence of the universe is evidence that someone must have created it. Atheists or agnostics would argue, however, that there could be a way that a universe could come into existence without having to be created by a deity (and in any event, if we need God to explain the existence of the universe, how then do we explain the existence of God?). Many interesting books have been written on this topic, and I would not have the time to do justice to it in this brief comment.