Once an officer can justify the need to use deadly force it doesn't matter what means he uses. It could be Baton, butter knife or running you over with a vehicle.
To justify deadly force the general standard is to protect himself or others from death or grievous bodily harm.
There are many rules on deadly force and they can vary on department or state. For instance using a Baton above the nipples can be considered deadly force by some Departments.
If you spray an officer with pepper spray he/she could be justified in using deadly force.
Most department I know use a 1 + 1 theory of control.
Using a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being presence and 10 being Deadly force. An Officer is allowed to use at least one level above the level of force being exerted by a subject.
For instance if you pull away from an Officer he/she can use a control hold or empty hand control. If it escalates and you attempt to strike an officer with a closed fist he can spray you with a chemical aerosol and so on.
Of course each situation is different and it can go from 1 to 10 in a heartbeat.
It depends on where you are. In the U.S. many police departments have different policies, but very generally speaking legally, an officer can use deadly force against a person with a knife or other contact weapon when that person is within a distance where the officer is in danger, or another way to say it is, when the attacker is in useful range of whatever weapon he or she is using. People generally tend to think of knives and other contact weapons as only dangerous within a few feet, but a person can get close to you much faster than most people realize.
The Departments Policy on the use of deadly force limits an officer .
In the United States, a police officer is justified in using deadly force against another person when the other person is putting the officer's life, or the life of another citizen, in immediate danger of death or grave bodily harm.When their or someone else's life is in immediate danger.
When the officer reasonably believes that his (or her) life is in danger.
The current law doesn't specifically prohibit any officer the use of any such force, particularly deadly force, even on a mentally handicapped teenager.
When applying deadly force, a police officer must be able to articulate the following: (This was the original question and I didn't agree with the answer I was given, let me know yours) Select one: _ a. Jeopardy _ b. Ability _ c. Opportunity _ d. All of the above
When actions that are willful, criminal, negligent, cause the death of someone else. Failure to use rules of self defense. Ability, Opportunity, and Jeopardy must coexist to justify the use of deadly force. When deadly force is used and these three elements do not coexist, the police officer is responsible for the death.
Assault. Possibly even suicide. Acting to disarm an officer would likely be met with justified deadly force.
In my opinion... I believe that they are wondering if the person they are attempting to arrest is going to pull a weapon out. May not be for all of the law enforcement officers, if any.
a landmark decision called Tennessee v. Garner in 1985. The court ruled that the use of deadly force by law enforcement is only justified when there is an immediate threat to the officer's life or the lives of others. This decision established the "objective reasonableness" standard for evaluating the use of deadly force.
The force (weight) between the person and earth diminishes with distance. eg double the distance, quarter the force.
If you want to be an officer yes you have to be smart an A person
Yes. Shooting a firearm at another person, and depending on the circumstances, even just pointing it at another person is considered deadly force, the highest level of physical force.