answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

communicate their results to other people

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What do scientist do after they reach conclusions in their experiment?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What can scientist do if results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?

draw conclusions


What can scientist do if the result of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?

draw conclusions


What can a scientist do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?

draw conclusions


What does a scientist do when she draws conclusions after conducting an experiment?

she is analyzing data


What do scientists do after the reach conclusions from the results of their experiments?

They share the results of the experiment.


What do scientist do after they have completed all the steps in an experiment?

Draw conclusions and write a report. If you are a high level scientist doing research , then the report is offered to a learned journal for promulgation/publication.


What should an experimenter do after analyzing data?

scientist analyes their experiment


A science researcher is reviewing another scientist's experiment and conclusion the reviewer would most likely consider the experiment invalid if?

it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given


How did scientist reach their conclusions during middle ages?

Scientists have always reached their conclusions by means of observation and reasoning, whether in the middle ages or at any other time.


What should be done after data is collected for an experiment?

The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.


How did scienctists reach there conclusions during the middle ages?

There are many ways in which a scientist could reach their conclusion during the middle ages. They could just observe.


How does a scientist critique another scientist's conclusions apex?

By presenting data that contradict those conclusions