answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

They do the experiment again, double check all their calculations, then they come up with a new theory if it's necessary. That's why there's no such thing as a scientific fact, only scientific theories.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What do scientists do when the evidence from experiments does not support a scientific theory?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why does scientific evidence support scientific theories?

use scientific evidence to support your answer


If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?

modify the theory or discard it altogether.


A physical representation of an atom is an example of a scientific?

If new evidence does not support a scientific theory, scientists will most likely


What can scientists do if the results of an experiments do not support a hypothesis?

draw conclusions


What are two factors that help maintain scientists believability?

The two factors that help maintain a scientists believability is evidence and logical support. These are the ones that are considered to be scientific credibility factors.


Why is the theory of relativity accepted by scientists?

Like all accepted scientific theories, there is a general consensus amongst scientists across the world that there is enough evidence from observation and experimentation to support it.


What evidence do scientists have to support their ideas?

The strongest piece of evidence for the endosymbiotic theory is the fact that mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own circular DNA, prokaryote fashion, and can still replicate, transcribe and translate some proteins. Their ribosomes are also fashioned as a prokaryotes would be.


Why is it important to offer evidence to support statement about experiments?

peanut butter


How do you support a hypothesis?

You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.


When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis what should the scientist do?

When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence


Need a scientific sentence with the word hypothesis?

The results of his experiments did not support his hypothesis.


How did Lavoisier's evidence support other scientists?

i dont now