What economic problems did the new government faces?

Answer 1

It is because both the private sector and public sector have a say in answering the basic economic questions, thus there will be a degree of high efficiancy (due to the private sector involvement) and social welfare too (due to the public sector involvement).

It allows the Government to intervene when the economy faces market failure. The mixed economic system allows markets to operate freely until it fails to allocate resources efficiently, after this, the government agencies, such as the EU Competition Commission, are able to correct for these failures. If this had been a completely free economic system, Government agencies wouldn't have the means of power to be able to intervene. Furthermore, if it was a centrally planned economic system (communist systems), the Government wouldn't have any drivers behind the intervention which may cause government failure for the market. (Mobeen Iqbal, Bahrain)

Writes ModelCitizen:.

Government bodies are an amazingly consistent display of their failure to utilize resources efficiently. In fact because they do not face monetary profit or loss, they have no idea if what they are doing is efficient. Questions such as what is an acceptable time for people to wait for medical treatment are unable to be answered efficiently by government, and people suffer for their failures. Extreme examples include North Korea when compared to South Korea - there is no difference between the two countries except for the choice of South Korea to all more freedoms to their people. Governments create Propaganda of 'market failures' which typically can only be defined as the price being higher than in the past, so they can 'intervene' to be able to provide an excuse for their existence, and to gain power at the expense of individuals. Societies that have greater government interventions such as regulations, subsidies, taxes, etc, are much worse off economically than those with less interventions.

Answer 2

It is because both the private sector and public sector have a say in answering the basic economic questions, thus there will be a degree of high efficiancy (due to the private sector involvement) and social welfare too (due to the public sector involvement).

It allows the Government to intervene when the economy faces market failure. The mixed economic system allows markets to operate freely until it fails to allocate resources efficiently, after this, the government agencies, such as the EU Competition Commission, are able to correct for these failures. If this had been a completely free economic system, Government agencies wouldn't have the means of power to be able to intervene. Furthermore, if it was a centrally planned economic system (communist systems), the Government wouldn't have any drivers behind the intervention which may cause government failure for the market. (Mobeen Iqbal, Bahrain)

Writes ModelCitizen:.

Government bodies are an amazingly consistent display of their failure to utilize resources efficiently. In fact because they do not face monetary profit or loss, they have no idea if what they are doing is efficient. Questions such as what is an acceptable time for people to wait for medical treatment are unable to be answered efficiently by government, and people suffer for their failures. Extreme examples include North Korea when compared to South Korea - there is no difference between the two countries except for the choice of South Korea to all more freedoms to their people. Governments create Propaganda of 'market failures' which typically can only be defined as the price being higher than in the past, so they can 'intervene' to be able to provide an excuse for their existence, and to gain power at the expense of individuals. Societies that have greater government interventions such as regulations, subsidies, taxes, etc, are much worse off economically than those with less interventions.