answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

All the New Testament gospels were originally anonymous and were only attributed to the apostles whose names they now bear later in the second century. The first gospel was the one now known as Mark's Gospel.

Scholars can demonstrate that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were largely based on Mark's Gospel, even having exactly the same words in the Greek language. Matthew and Luke also shared a sayings source, now known as the hypothetical 'Q' document. Scholars also say that John's Gospel is loosely based on Luke's Gospel, with some material taken direct from Mark. So the synoptic gospel that was the starting point for the other gospels is Mark's Gospel.

It is uncertain where the author of Mark's Gospel obtained his source material. Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) simply says that Mark seems to depend on traditions (and perhaps already shaped sources) received in Greek. It is possible that Mark's Gospel could have been influenced by the Gospel of Thomas, a sayings gospel, but that is at best a minority opinion among scholars who continue to debate whether Thomaswas even written during the first century.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

Many believe the Matthew, Mark, Luke are the Synoptic gospels.

.................................................................................................................................................................................

The gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are called the Synoptic Gospels because they include many of the same stories, often in a similar sequence and in similar or sometimes identical wording.

They contrast with John, whose content is comparatively distinct.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What gospel is the origin of the synoptic gospels?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which gospel was written to inspire faith in Jesus but is not a synoptic gospel?

The gospel of John is not part of the Synoptic Gospels.The gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are referred to as the Synoptic Gospels.


Which gospel records the least miracles?

John's Gospel records seven miracles, which is less than in the synoptic Gospels.


Of the four evanglists which was not part of the synoptic writers?

Saint John (he wrote the gospel of john in the bible) is the evangelist who was not part of the synoptic writers. The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke were known as the synoptic writers because they had many of the same stories in their gospels.


Which Gospel was written independent of the Synoptic Gospels?

A:John's Gospel is certainly quite different to the synoptic gospels. It is almost completely independent of Mark's Gospel, from which scholars say that Matthew and Luke were copied. However, it is not really independent, as it was loosely based on Luke, with a small amount of material taken direct from Mark. Being further removed from Mark, and having been written with somewhat less concern compared with Matthew and Luke for following the source as closely as possible, John's Gospel is relatively independent of the Synoptic Gospels.


Which one of the four gospels is not synoptic?

A:Among the New Testament gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke are known as synoptic ('seen with the same eye') gospels, because when laid sise by side in the original Greek language and seen with the same eye, it can be shown that two of these gospels must have been based on the third. The original of these gospels is now known to have been Mark's Gospel. On the other hand, when John's Gospel is laid alongside the others, its dependence is not immediately apparent. Because John was more loosely based on Luke and, to a lesser extent, Mark, there are few similarities in the text and even the storyline often differs. It is therefore not a synoptic gospel.The Gospel of John is not one of the "synoptic gospels"


Who are the 3 synoptics in the Catholic Church?

The gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are the synoptic gospels, as theya re similar to an parallel to each other. The gospel of John is different.


Encountering Jesus in the New Testament chapter review answer?

List three ways johns gospel Differs from the synoptic gospels


What language does the word synoptic gospels come from?

A:The word 'synoptic' is derived from the Greek language (synoptikos) and means 'with the same eye'. It was used for the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) because when lain in parallel and read synoptically in the original Greek language, it becomes clear that much of the material in two of the gospels, Matthew and Luke, was copied from the Gospel of Mark.


Did John assume that his readers understood the basic outline of the synoptic Gospels?

A:The author of John's Gospel certainly knew of the existence of Mark and Luke, as his own gospel was loosely based on those gospels (mainly Luke, but some material is from Mark), but like the author of Luke he seems entirely unaware of the existence of Matthew's Gospel. John was written to be the gospel of choice in the Johannine community and the synoptic gospels were probably discouraged. Nevertheless the anonymous author of Johnassumed his readers might have known the synoptic gospels, as evidenced by the fact that even when completely changing the synoptic account, he was careful not to directly contradict his sources.However, there is a difference between possibly knowing of the synoptic gospels and knowing them well enough that John need not tell everything about the life and mission of Jesus. When John omits details found in the synoptic Gospels of Mark and Luke, it was not because the author expected his readers to have found those stories elsewhere, while he focussed on important new information. For example, John omits the nativity story of Luke, but it can be seen elsewhere that the author and his community did not really believe that Jesus was born in Bethlehem.


What type of gospels are the first three gospels?

A:The first three New Testament gospels are known as the synoptic gospels. The word 'synoptic' means 'seen with the same eye' and is used to describe them because, when laid in parallel and 'seen with the same eye' in the original Greek language, it can be demonstrated that one gospel (Mark) must have been the original from which the other two were copied.


Which one of the gospels is not synoptic?

john


What does synoptic mean when referring to the christian gospels?

A:The word synoptic means 'seen with the same eye' and can refer to many different things such as synoptic weather charts. In a religious context, it refers to the close similarities among the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke - the synoptic gospels. When the synoptic gospels are looked at in parallel - synoptically - in the original Greek language, it soon becomes apparent that there is a literary dependency among the three gospels. New Testament scholars say that Mark's Gospel was written first, approximately 70 CE, and that Matthew and Lukewere largely based on Mark's original Gospel. There are further similarities between Matthew and Luke only, which have been traced back to the hypothetical 'Q' document.