austin said that the law is a commend, sovereign authoty and scantion by backdaded . without sovereign has no law. law is a order or commend but all commend is not law according to Austin.if violed the law he get fine or punishment. e.g punishment for mader life jail or death.
John Austin's "Command Theory" is a concept of law that holds that law is nothing more than a 'command' backed by threat, and is meant to be ubiquitous in its application. Austin believed that every legal system had to have a 'sovereign' who creates the law while at the same time the sovereign is not subject to it. The sovereign is the only source of the 'commands' and the sovereign is not subject to commands by others.
Arguments against this theory state that this is an inaccurate description of law, noting that laws may have several sources and the legislators who enact them are also subject to the same laws they create.
critically examine austins theory of law
Meet the Austins was created in 1960.
austins girlfriend is ally
Meet the Austins has 191 pages.
Differentiate or compare theory from law
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
A Theory is unproven, but Laws are proven. Theory becomes law after that theory is proven correct.
The theory come first because without a theory there is nothing to make a law.
Austins Bridge - album - was created on 2007-02-27.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.
"Law" is just a thumbnail version of a theory.