Want this question answered?
An absolute advantage is when trading only occurs between one or two parties. This is common in the Philippine economy since most industries are monopolistic.
When its production costs are lower.
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
need answer
One way for a country to obtain an absolute advantage in marketing a product outside its borders is to
enter into an orderly marketing agreement
There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.
Yes, since each country can individually specialize in its comparative advantage, the total income for both countries will increase. This is even true if one country has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods.
When one country can produce a product more cheaply than another country this is called comparative advantage. When one country can produce more goods than another using an equal amount of resources, this is called absolute advantage.
no
Those theories both refer to international trade, however absolute advantage was mentioned earlier. According to it, a trade between 2 countries is possible only if one has absolute advantage (produces a good with less costs or with less time) and other has absolute disadvantage in producing that good but at the same time it must have an absolute advantage in producing the secong good. If a country produces a good better (cheaper/faster), it would specialize on it and export. Theory assumes that only 2 counties and 2 goods exist, no other costs except for labour are taken into account.
One-crop economy