Both HIV-1 and HIV-2 are equally "dangerous" in that both are sexually transmitted and both lead to AIDS.
There are several difference between the two, in terms of how transmissible they are and how each progressess.
The bottom line--you want to avoid either type of the virus.
HIV 1 can cause fever, headache, fatigue, swollen lymph glands, and a rash. HIV 2 can cause all of those plus confusion, diarrhea, mouth sores, stiff muscles, forgetfulness, and night sweats.
Because no whole cells of HIV have ever been isolated from human tissues. In theory, a retrovirus known as HIV1 and its variant HIV2 cause Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, but as yet, it has not been isolated as a whole cell. A culture can only start with actual cells, not theoretical ones.
what is the result when hiv is non reactive
More dangerous Most dangerous
Safer Walking is safer than cycling
more dangerous
more dangerous most dangerous
There both extremly dangerous to hard to tell which is more dangerous
yes
Both are dangerous
Since the word "dangerous" is considered a long adjective (of 3 or more syllables), the words "more" and "most" are used to form the comparative and superlative forms. The comparative form is more dangerous. The superlative form is most dangerous.
Both can be dangerous, but the bear is larger and more powerful, so yes, the bear is the more dangerous of the two.