0
What is one question historians that examine the Roman Empire might ask?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Why did they imagine that admitting endless numbers of peoples moving in from the east would not end in their takeover by them.
A similar question might be asked by the Western world today.
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do historians use to mark the end of the western roman empire?
Historians use 476 as the conventional date for the fall of the Roman Empire. In that year the emperor of the western part of the Roman Empire, Romulus Augustus, was deposed.
What did the eastern part of Rome become after it's fall?
The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to be the Roman Empire. Historians have coined the term Byzantine Empire to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of this empire. However, the people in question did not even know this term and continued to call it Roman Empire.
What did historians call the western roman empire?
They called in the Western Roman empire. The only change of any of the roman empires was in the eastern roman empire. The eastern roman empire changed into the Byzantine Empire
What event do historians use to mark the end of the Western Roman Empire?
Historians use 476 as the conventional date for the fall of the Roman Empire. In that year the emperor of the western part of the Roman Empire, Romulus Augustus, was deposed.
What is the eastern part of the roman empire known as?
Historians have coined the term Byzantine empire to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of this empire. The eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years. The people in question did not use this term. They called it Roman Empire.
What do the historians call the West Roman Empire?
vaikans
What did the eastern part of the empire become in the 5th century?
The eastern part of the Roman Empire became what remained the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of this empire in the 5th century. Historians use the term Byzantine empire to indicate the eastern part after the fall of the western part. However, the people in question did not know this term, called their empire Roman Empire and considered it to be the Roman Empire.
What document helped explain the decline of the Roman Empire?
No particular document explains the decline of the Roman Empire. Historians have elaborated this notion from the writings of several Roman and Greek authors. Some historians even challenge this notion of a decline of this empire.
How did Historians get their information from the founding of the Byzantine Empire 330AD?
They get the information from the writings of ancient Roman historians.
What did the eastern roman empire eventually come?
The eastern part of the Roman Empire became the surviving part of the Roman Empire. It was not affected by the invasions by the Germanic peoples which led to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years. Historians have coined the term Byzantine Empire to indicate this part of the empire after the fall of the western part. The people in question did not know this term and called their empire Roman Empire.
What event do the historians often use to mark the end of the western empire?
Historians use 476 as the conventional date for the fall of the Roman Empire. In that year the emperor of the western part of the Roman Empire, Romulus Augustus, was deposed.
Who is considered the founder of the Eastern Roman Empire?
There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.
