Liberalism
Ancient Rome never had a type of government where power rested with the people. Such a type of government was found only in the Athenian Democracy.
i think its government
Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.
rich people could serve
one of the the common people in the roman rebuplic a person who had no say in government
Liberalism is the belief that people should be as free as possible from government restraints.
Liberalism is the belief that people should be as free as possible from government restraints.
Liberalism is the belief that people should be as free as possible from government restraints.
Liberalism
The main belief shared by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is government by the people and for the people. This belief is the basis of the American government.
In the US there is one legitimate political party that is for the least amount of government as possible. This is the Libertarian Party. One US Senator identifies himself as a Republican but also a Libertarian, Senator Rand of Kentucky.
The procedural restraints found in the Bill of Rights are that before the Government can deprive you of life, liberty, or property certain procedures need to be followed. An example is the court process used to deprive people of their freedom and sometimes their life.
When the government no longer serves the people, it is the responsibility of the people by what ever means possible to replace the government .
It is not possible to make people (i.e. to force people) believe in anything. You can fool them into a belief, but then you run the change that they will discover your deception.
I would say Yes. If your "belief" breaks some existing law, the government can limit that belief. For example, if you believed (for religious reasons) in human sacrifice, the government would, of course, frown on that.
freedom of belief
Restraints and centrifugal force.