Smalltalk is dynamically typed whereas C++ is statically typed. As a result C++ performs better than Smalltalk. However, Smalltalk inheritance is less strict than C++ so it's a bit more flexible.
C was made in the 70s. Smalltalk was made in the 70s. Squeak was made in 1996, Croquet in 1999, and cobalt in 2007C was the third in a progression of three languages named A, B, C, from what I heardA is actually BCPL I thinkBCPL B C C++ (P was taken for pascal p-code)
Java, Smalltalk, and Eiffel are all object-oriented languages; Lisp is functional.
There is no such thing as devoid in C++.
these are difference in between c and c++: a) C is a SPL and C++ is a OOP. b) C has not concept of object but C++ has this feature. c) C has not 'class' name data type but C++ has.
There are no such terms in C++.
the difference is that c plus is better because you get big grades
how do we use loops in c plus plus programing and what are basic differences between do,for and while loop
C was made in the 70s. Smalltalk was made in the 70s. Squeak was made in 1996, Croquet in 1999, and cobalt in 2007C was the third in a progression of three languages named A, B, C, from what I heardA is actually BCPL I thinkBCPL B C C++ (P was taken for pascal p-code)
Java, Smalltalk, and Eiffel are all object-oriented languages; Lisp is functional.
There is no such thing as 'unix C++'.
Yes
Nothing.
It is used to distinguish between the C or C++
Global variables can be seen in all blocks of your program, when local variables are visible only within the block where it's declared.
There is no such thing as devoid in C++.
turbo c is a compiler and c++ is a programming language.
these are difference in between c and c++: a) C is a SPL and C++ is a OOP. b) C has not concept of object but C++ has this feature. c) C has not 'class' name data type but C++ has.