ther is different between t.g.and .m.l
Grammar is a field of study in linguistics that deals with the structure of any given language called syntax such as structural grammar,transformational grammar. Linguistics on the other hand is the scientific study of languages. It incorporates grammar,semantics,phonetics,stylistics and other disciplines to include social sciences eg: in different dialects, socio-economic classes, child language development etc. in order to understand the origins of a particular language and it's place within other language groups.
firstly, modern liguistic is DESCRIPTIVE(to describe the way people speak) , whilst traditional grammar is PRESCRIPTIVE(to prescribe the way people speak, or simply, to tell people how to speak and let people know the correct way of their speaking )secondly, tradition grammar pays more attention to the written form of language, while linguistics attaches more importance to speaking than writing.thirdly, tradtional grammar has been restricted mainly to SYNTAX, that is, the way of words making patterns to form sentences, while linguistics has a boarder scope for researching, eg. pragmatics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, ect. which, accordingly, are out of the scope of traditional grammar.of course, there are other differences between the old and new appoaches to language research, such as Diachronic vs Synchronic and so....
There is no difference between modern and functional grammar. The grammar used in our modern language is all traditional. The distinction between modern and functional grammar rests more on how it was traditionally taught. In the past, for example, teachers would teach that a sentence could not end in a preposition, but this is not true. Communicative grammar refers more to a teaching strategy for ESL/Foreign language speakers. Instead of teaching grammar in a traditional method, listening, reading, speaking, and writing are implemented.
There is no difference. All grammar is traditional. There is a difference between formal or written grammar, which insists on certain distinctions, as between who and whom, the appropriate use of subjunctive and the indicative moods and agreement of subject and verb, and informal or colloquial grammar which does not. In the old days, silly teachers often mistakenly taught that an English sentence may not end with a preposition, but that was simply incorrect, not formal grammar. Today's silly teachers sometimes mistakenly teach that the pronoun I may be the object of a proposition -" Dad took my sister and I to the beach" - but that is simply incorrect, not informal grammar. Modern English grammar, as the description of modern English usage characteristic of people under the age of forty, certainly suffers from the reduction of distinctions, the loss of refinement and the tongue-tied confusion of tenses and moods which is the inevitable result of having its standards set by the most careless speakers rather than by the most careful. Traditional grammar doesn't let you write like you talk. It doesn't, among other things, let you end a sentence with a preposition or start a sentence with the word "and." Some English teachers still insist that people comply with each and every one of those archaic rules, but many writers have accepted and even recommended the use of modern grammar instead.
Modern linguistics is mainly synchronic, focusing on the present-day language. unless the various states of a language are successfully studied, it will not be possible to describe language from a diachronic point of view.
Grammar is a field of study in linguistics that deals with the structure of any given language called syntax such as structural grammar,transformational grammar. Linguistics on the other hand is the scientific study of languages. It incorporates grammar,semantics,phonetics,stylistics and other disciplines to include social sciences eg: in different dialects, socio-economic classes, child language development etc. in order to understand the origins of a particular language and it's place within other language groups.
G. A. Padley has written: 'Grammatical theory in Western Europe, 1500-1700' -- subject(s): Comparative and general Grammar, Historical Grammar, History, Linguistics, Medieval and modern Latin language
firstly, modern liguistic is DESCRIPTIVE(to describe the way people speak) , whilst traditional grammar is PRESCRIPTIVE(to prescribe the way people speak, or simply, to tell people how to speak and let people know the correct way of their speaking )secondly, tradition grammar pays more attention to the written form of language, while linguistics attaches more importance to speaking than writing.thirdly, tradtional grammar has been restricted mainly to SYNTAX, that is, the way of words making patterns to form sentences, while linguistics has a boarder scope for researching, eg. pragmatics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, ect. which, accordingly, are out of the scope of traditional grammar.of course, there are other differences between the old and new appoaches to language research, such as Diachronic vs Synchronic and so....
traditional language studies refers to the words which delt with the nature of language prior to the advent of modern linguistics (general linguistics 1916) is regarded as a theoratic foundation to the newer trend of a linguistic study.
There is no difference between modern and functional grammar. The grammar used in our modern language is all traditional. The distinction between modern and functional grammar rests more on how it was traditionally taught. In the past, for example, teachers would teach that a sentence could not end in a preposition, but this is not true. Communicative grammar refers more to a teaching strategy for ESL/Foreign language speakers. Instead of teaching grammar in a traditional method, listening, reading, speaking, and writing are implemented.
Most people regard Saussure as the father of modern linguistics. However, grammar has been discussed an analyzed since ancient Roman and Greek times--and since ancient Chinese and Sanskrit times.
Charles Francis Hockett was a linguist known for his work in descriptive linguistics and the study of animal communication. He contributed to the understanding of language structure through his writings on phonology, syntax, and semantics. Some of his notable works include "A Course in Modern Linguistics" and "The View from Language: Selected Essays, 1948-1974".
Aldo D. Scaglione has written: 'The theory of German word order from the Renaissance to the present' -- subject(s): Comparative and general Grammar, German language, Grammar, Comparative and general, Historiography, History, Linguistics, Methodology, Word order 'Essays on the arts of discourse' -- subject(s): Modern Philology, Philology, Modern 'Nature and Love in the Middle Ages'
traditional things and modern things
Bas Aarts has written: 'Engish syntax and argumentation' -- subject(s): English language, Persuasion (Rhetoric), Semantics, Syntax 'Syntactic Gradience' -- subject(s): Comparative and general Grammar, Categorization (Linguistics), Gradation, Syntax 'Oxford modern English grammar' -- subject(s): Grammar, English language
Yes. Modern linguistics is the study of the structure of human language from a scientific approach.
the characteristics of traditional grammar are : -it's based on the analysis of the target weitten language especially grammar wish was taught deductively throught the presentation and study of explicit rules . - the foreing language was learned basicaly on the translation literary text . - only the person who have certain level can learn foreing language . -Teachers in that time were detactive . - there is no systematic attention to the skills of speaking and listening .