After the authority of the caliphate declined, landlords seized power over peasants. This caused suffering in agricultural productivity. Tax revenues declined, and Arab and other Middle Eastern traders began to lose ground. European merchants began to challenge the Arabs in other parts of the Mediterranean.
Of course, the Western and Chinese expansion kinda screwed the Muslims, too.
The Gupta empire declined because of bad resourcesand they didn't have any world peace.
France and england
Farming before World War I was labour intensive. After the war, many farmworkers had been killed in Europe. This led to a shortage of labour.
The question makes an assumption which reverses what actually happened historically. As the Islamic Caliphates expanded, they led to the homogenization of the languages under their authority and the proliferation as Arabic as the dominant language of communication. It was not Arabic that led to the growth of the Islamic Empires, rather the Islamic Empires that led to the growth of Arabic.Once we start getting into international politics and peaceful Islamic evangelism, having a written language, such as Arabic was, was very impressive to the rulers of several empires, especially the Kingdom of Ghana. In order to educate his civil servants about writing, he embraced Islam and set up Islamic schools. In this way Islam spread to new empires, but these regions did not join with the dominant Caliphates in the Middle East and North Africa, but remained independent empires.
The greed for land and money led to decline of Mughal Empire since more taxes were levied on peasant farmers such as the zazia tax on hindus.
The Turkish migrations greatly expanded and empowered the Muslim World. The Seljuks and Ottomans were responsible for the last two great Muslim Empires and conquests. It was the Ottomans who pushed the boundaries of Islam all the way to the Gates of Vienna. On the eastern edge, the Turkish migrations into Xinjiang Province led to the development of the Hui People (Muslim Chinese).
The lack of money led to their decline.
The Egyptian civilization was once one of the worldâ??s great empires and one of the most advanced. There is not one specific event that lead to the decline. It was the unfortunate corruption, mismanagement and lack of investment into the country that cause their problems.
You need to specify which two empires you are referring to if you want to make it possible to answer your question.
The Muslim military leader who led an attack against the Christians was _______.
Nationalism led to unification, and the First World War,marking the star of independence revolutions, which impacted large empires during the 19th century. Apex: It led groups within empires to fight for their political independence.
The Gupta empire declined because of bad resourcesand they didn't have any world peace.
3 factors that led to the end of feudalism was the bubonic plague, the hundreds' years war, and the magna carta
Factors that led to the decline of the middle ages are all due to the Crusades (that counts as one!) Medieval Europe's expansion view of the world Spices and clothes from Asia due to trade The decline of Feudalism due to the noble class no longer existing The economy became better due to all of these. The best way to describe it is that the Crusades led to the decline. :)
Drought and a decline in trade
Three results of World War 1 include defeat of central forces led by Germany, four empires collapsed (Turkish, German, Austrian and Russian) and it led to the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
France and england