Warfare in ancient times was drastically different from today. In the time of the Romans, foot soldier infantry were the primary fighting force. The Legionaries of Rome fought primarily with the pilum, a javelin type spear, a short sword called a gladius, a dagger called a pugio, and a door or tower shield called the scutum. They wore scale armor composed of overlapping metal plates held together by leather strapping or a type of chain mail hauberk. They had additional armor to protect the limbs, such as greaves and vambraces.
When engaging in combat, the Roman Legions followed strict tactical doctrines, which called for fighting in formations. This generally centered on the phalanx, which was a formation where the infantry formed a wall with their shields to block the attacks of other enemy infantry. By staying in a tight formation, the men behind the front line could protect themselves and the men of the front from arrows by holding their shields above them. The front light soldiers could then use their javelins or short swords to dispatch enemy combatants.
The Roman Legions had many auxiliary combat forces, including cavalry, archers, and various siege engines, and warships.
Ultimately, warfare in those ancient times was a bloody affair, as the opposing armies would literally have to hack each other to bits in order to force the opposition to surrender or to annihilate them outright. There was little in the way of medical treatment, so even minor wounds sustained in combat usually meant death or cripplement.
Sieges were another affair altogether, as a fortress would be surrounded and besieged for months at a time, some even lasting years. All the while the attackers would lob boulders, flaming pitch, dead bodies and animals over the walls. They would attempt to breech any weak point in a fortification, generally under counter fire from the defenders, or scale the walls directly. Sieges were almost more grueling than outright combat, causing greater fatigue on the attackers, so it would be avoided when possible.
fighting in battle hunting and other things like that
How did the battle of Cannae affect the Roman empire
Roman shields were used in battle to protect from arrows and swords etc.
Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.Hannibal was defeated by the Roman general Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC.
No. The Roman Army had ceased to exist long before the Battle of Hastings.
it was in roman times
You battle them like 8 times
well it was very hard to be a roman
It is like Times Roman
fighting in battle hunting and other things like that
The Roman goddess of battle is Minerva.
hard and shiny
Flavius Josephus, 1st century AD historian, in "Jewish Wars"
How did the battle of Cannae affect the Roman empire
it's just like Times Roman
because in ancient times the roman empire had bronze sword and a angle of Greek mythology
Settlement there dates to prehistoric times, but the Roman military colony of Lugdunum was founded in 43 BC. After the Roman usurper Clodius Albinus was defeated in a battle there, the Roman presence was assumed by the Burgundians.