What were the different classes of ancient india?

Answer 1

The classes, or castes, of ancient India were the brahmins, kshatriyas, vaisyas and sudras. The brahmins were the priest class, the kshatriyas the ruler and warrior class, the vaisyas the merchants, artisans, farmers, etc., and the sudras the peasants and laborers. There were also the "untouchables." They were the people who did not belong to any of the formal castes, and were thus looked down upon. They were typically given the occupations that members of the other castes found dishonorable or unclean.

Answer 2

Kings ruled the land Brahmins were the priests teachers and judges Kshatriyas were the warriors or knights Vaisyas were the farmers and merchants Sudras were the craftworkers or labourers Untouchables were the outcasts and these are the answers a.

Varnas

c.

Sanskrit

b.

Sudras

d.

the Vedas

Answer 3

Whether you happen to like it or not, Rumpy is speaking truth. These terms are fuzzy because they are simply fuzzy. There is no concrete basis to back anything up or nail it down. Lawyers are free to declare themselves in any area of practice they happen to like. There are some rules about referring to oneself as a specialist. That's just about it. As a totally random example, a lawyer might say he practices criminal defense but only ever do drunk driving. That's a real example. Now, should he be saying he's a drunk driving lawyer to be more accurate? There's no rule. There are only norms and patterns of usage.

It's not a matter of liking it or not. I couldn't care less. My point was that there seems to be a difference. Many firms seem to recognize that difference. And there is a logical basis for that difference. The rest is irrelevant. But, as you've suggested, the line is not always drawn, and the difference might be largely irrelevant. I'm content with agreeing that many don't see or care about the difference. But in my opinion, and apparently in the opinion of many firms, there is a difference. Given that the original question was about whether there is a difference, and what "business law" encompasses, I think my point stands. But as often happens in these discussions, opinion vs. opinion leads to wasted time. Therefore, I'll leave you two to it.

Answer 4

you