at the end of ww2 because of food shortages
They both have nukes, so we would all be dead. But excluding nukes, russia have a lot more men than Britain so id say Russia
If they fought a limited war it could go either way, depending on the circumstances, but I have trouble envisioning a limited war with nukes. Once the first nuke is detonated, it will probably lead to more nukes, with no limits, and no winners.
The U.S obvoius
Over the years, the U.S. has decided upon many policies they will follow during a war. For example, in World War II, the United States decided that they would stay out of it until their best interests were attacked.
Oh hell no. If it were like WWII only, we were the bad guys, with no allies, and slightly better weaponry. we would be beaten faster than you can say "pwned". Especially if russia and everyone else decided to use nukes.
Depends on how they attacked you. Depends on how they attacked you.
the entire world would be destroyed and you too so don't do it
An atomic power can't declare war, that would imply using nukes. The last time the US declared war was in WWII. And nukes didn't exist then.
Well Afganistan is a pretty big place so you would need a lot of nukes. That would cause unbelievable damage to the environment for years to come. Of course you might want to consider how many innocent men, women and children would be killed in such an attack and who might then decide to attack us before we attacked them as well.
No. there would have been a war if the nukes were launched
right now... Still Japan. Pakistan they have nukes :)
They do not have the technology to reach each other.