because this is to do with religious reasons. Scientificaly people think there was the big bang theory and humans formed from monkeys. Then religious people beilive god made this world. I don't believe either, i don't know how we came about and i don't really care.
To please the strictly religious parents of various persuasions whose children attend them that think they can dictate what everyone's children are taught. If they want the government to teach what they want and only what they want, they should home school their kids. It's better for them anyway, from a psychological perspective.
Primarily for the same reasons that groups of creationists today oppose the teaching of scientific models wherever they can: they feel that these scientific models contradict their holy scripture, and seek to defend their beliefs and religious identity. The rationalizations they have for this behaviour are diverse: for instance, they may perceive the teaching of secular knowledge as an attack on the moralities they associate with their scriptures, and argue that these teachings have undesirable moral consequences.
It is still legal because it is argued to be a scientific principle. The main problem is that because of the theory's great lack of proof, controversy has erupted over this subject.
The act which banned Tennessee public school teachers from teaching the theory of evolution was called the Butler Act. The law was passed in 1925.
The Butler Act
Nothin! Hehehehe:)
There are inumerable examples. The time dilation effect of relativity had essentially nothing to do with the reasons for the ban on DDT. Yes, that was an important one, but it was less unassociated with DDT than the link between vitamin deficiency and scurvy, and the isotropic expansion of the universe were.
Short answer: no. One of the treaties in the 1960's banned above ground testing and all countries (the US, Soviet Union, France, and China) have followed that ban. The US and the Soviet Union agreed, in a separate treaty, to stop underground testing in the 1970's and both have followed that treaty. Other countries, India and Pakistan and possibly North Korea, did not agree to ban all testing and have conducted underground nuclear testing in the last ten years.
No according to her recently released book she got caught up in a bad divorce and will probably lose it if she has not already. She is back living in the U.S. with family.
Helium was initially selected for the lifting gas because it was the safest to use in airships, as it is not flammable. At the time it was extremely expensive, and was only available from natural gas reserves in the United States. Hydrogen, by comparison, could be cheaply produced by any industrialized nation and had more lift. American rigid airships using helium were forced to conserve the gas at all costs and this hampered their operation. While a hydrogen-filled ship could routinely vent gas as necessary, a helium-filled ship had to resort to dynamic force if it was too light to descend, a measure that took a toll on its structure.Despite a U.S. ban on helium exports, the Germans designed the ship to use the gas in the belief that the ban would be lifted; when the designers learned that the ban was to remain in place, they were forced to re-engineer the Hindenburg to use hydrogen for lift. Despite the danger of using flammable hydrogen, no alternative gases that could provide sufficient lift could be produced in sufficient quantities. One beneficial side effect of employing hydrogen was that more passenger cabins could be added. The Germans' long history of flying hydrogen-filled passenger airships without a single injury or fatality engendered a widely held belief they had mastered the safe use of hydrogen. The Hindenburg's first season performance appeared to demonstrate this.
because it is a religious worldview that contradicts the first amendment of no establishment of religion in any state area.
whether a state can ban the teaching of evolution in public schools
They believed people had a right to their religious freedoms, and evolution is the exact opposite of what the major monotheistic religions believe in in the United States.
They believed people had a right to their religious freedoms, and evolution is the exact opposite of what the major monotheistic religions believe in in the United States.
Schools in L.A. will ban chocolate milk from students so that proves that schools can ban chocolate milk from students!
Ultimately, because it conflicted with prevalent religious beliefs, and therefore undermined authority in so far as it was partly based in adherence to certain religious beliefs.
The legislature passed the "Butler Act" (Named after State Rep. John W. Butler) which banned the teaching of evolution in the classroom.
Of course you can talk about Pokémon. Though some schools and jobs will not appreciate it, and some may have rules that ban it.
To stop people missing school.
No, it's rude and disrespectful to the teachers who are spending their time and efforts in teaching, it can also result in problems between pupils and schools are right just to blanket ban it.
no they shouldnt bc in schools their lunches can be expired
todds