0
It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both. ... Niccolo Machiavelli
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoKurt Cobain.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why be feared than loved?
It is much better to be feared than loved for the purpose of retaining authority owing to dread of punishment.
What did Machiavelli mean when he said it is much safer to be feared than loved?
no it's not!....being lovedd is way more important than being feared. yeah fear =respect but no love= being lonely....everyone needs love
Who said It is much safer to be feared than loved?
Machiavellie
Who said you would rather be feared than loved?
Niccolo Machiavelli
What does its better to be feared than loved mean?
It simply means it's better to be feared than loved. Some like to be feared more because when someone fears a person they usually are to scared of them to fight back. But it's more of an opinion because some people would rather be loved
Which philosopher said it was better to be feared than love?
Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian diplomat, philosopher, and writer, wrote in "The Prince" that it is safer for a ruler to be feared than loved if they cannot be both. He argued that fear is a more reliable means of maintaining power and control.
Why did Machiavelli believe that it is better for a prince to be feared than be loved?
He believed this because if the people of the town/city loved him, they may get comfortable with him and not do the work they are assighned to
What characteristic did Machiavelli believe a ruler must have?
Machiavelli believed that a ruler must be both feared and loved, but if they cannot be both, it is better to be feared than loved. He also emphasized the importance of being cunning, adaptable, and willing to act ruthlessly when necessary to maintain power.
Why does Machiavelli say that it is better for a prince to be both loved and feared?
Machiavelli latently presents idea that the power of the leader depends more on the qualities of the man than on the will of god. That´s the matter. Loved and feared qualities need theirs limits the same way as anything else in social relations.
Why is it safer for a ruler to be feared than loved according to Machiavelli?
What he meant is that, after conquering new territory, you can expect resistance to your rule, unless the locals love you enough not to want to rebel, or are so weak that they do not have the means. What he said is that it would be best to be both loved and feared, but since that is impossible, it is safer if people cannot challenge your rule than if they can, but don't want to.
Is it better to have loved or been loved?
Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.
Tis have better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all?
It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all
