answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Chief Justice

John Marshall................Federalist Party

Associate Justices

Bushrod Washington.....Federalist Party

William Johnson............Democratic-Republican

Henry B. Livingston.......Democratic-Republican

Thomas Todd................Democratic-Republican

Gabrielle Duvall.............Democratic-Republican

Joseph Story.................Democratic-Republican

Case Citation:

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

James McCulloch, head of the Baltimore Branch of the Second Bank of the United States, was originally sued by John James, a citizen, who took action as an intervenor (a party without a direct interest who has a legitimate stake in the outcome of the case). because he hoped to collect a portion of the proceeds from the Second National Bank's delinquent taxes. He won a judgment in Baltimore County Court. McCulloch was the nominal respondent for the US government.

The case was eventually appealed to the US Supreme Court.

Representing the State of Maryland

William Wirt, US Attorney General

Daniel Webster, attorney arguing for US government

William Pinkney, attorney arguing for US government

Representing the US Federal Government

Luther Martin, Maryland State Attorney General

Joseph Hopkinson, attorney arguing for the State of Maryland

Walter Jones, attorney arguing for the State of Maryland

US Supreme Court Justices

Chief Justice John Marshall

Justice Bushrod Washington

Justice William Johnson

Justice Henry B. Livingston

Justice Thomas Todd

Justice Gabriel Duvall

Justice Joseph Story

Case Citation:

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Fourth Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the Supreme Court and wrote the opinion for McCulloch v. Maryland,(1819). Marshall lead the Court from 1801-1835.

Case Citation:

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

James McCulloch, head of the Baltimore Branch of the Second Bank of the United States, was originally sued by John James, a citizen, who took action as an intervenor (a party without a direct interest who has a legitimate stake in the outcome of the case). because he hoped to collect a portion of the proceeds from the Second National Bank's delinquent taxes. He won a judgment in Baltimore County Court. McCulloch was the nominal respondent for the US government.

The case was eventually appealed to the US Supreme Court.

Representing the State of Maryland

William Wirt, US Attorney General

Daniel Webster, attorney arguing for US government

William Pinkney, attorney arguing for US government

Representing the US Federal Government

Luther Martin, Maryland State Attorney General

Joseph Hopkinson, attorney arguing for the State of Maryland

Walter Jones, attorney arguing for the State of Maryland

US Supreme Court Justices

Chief Justice John Marshall

Justice Bushrod Washington

Justice William Johnson

Justice Henry B. Livingston

Justice Thomas Todd

Justice Gabriel Duvall

Justice Joseph Story

Case Citation:

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
James W. McCulloch, Cashier of the Baltimore, Maryland, branch of the Second Bank of the United States, was the nominal "plaintiff in error" who petitioned the US Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819). McCulloch was a proxy for the federal government in a dispute over Congress' constitutional authority to charter a national bank because he refused to pay taxes the State of Maryland attempted to impose on any bank not chartered by the State.

The case was actually a political power struggle between the state and federal governments.

Case Citation:

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Fourth Chief Justice, John Marshall

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who were the major players in the McCulloch v Maryland case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about U.S. History

What did mcculloch v Maryland and gibbons v ogden have in common?

They both gave more power to the federal government instead of the individual states


What court case was used to strengthen the federal government's power over that of the states?

the McChulloch vs. Maryland court case


Did the decision in McCulloch v Maryland involve a loose interpretation of the US Constitution?

Some may claim most of Chief Justice Marshall's opinions involved a "loose" interpretation of the Constitution; however, the solution to the problem involved invoking specific clauses (Article I, Section 8, Necessary and Proper Clause; Article VI, Supremacy Clause) that were clearly intended for application when federal and state governments had a conflict in power. In my opinion, the decision in McCulloch v. Maryland was well-reasoned and fell within the original intent of the Framers; therefore, I would say this is not an example of a "loose" interpretation (one isn't concretely supported).Counter OpinionHe made a loose interpretation by basing his decision in part on implied powers that naturally arose from the exercise of enumerated constitutional powers awarded to the Legislative branch in Article I, Section 8.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)


What are the main reasons for attrition?

what are the three major reason for case attrrition


Why did southern states stay in the union?

Presumably you mean the border-states - Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland and Delaware. These were deeply-divided states that narrowly voted against joining the Confederacy. In the case of Missouri, inter-sectional violence continued throughout the war. In the case of Kentucky, a Confederate assembly was set up by an invading Confederate army, but it collapsed after they retreated. In the case of Maryland, Lincoln had (illegally) jailed the state's pro-Southern leaders, but so much Confederate sentiment remained that his assassination was actually planned in a Maryland boarding-house. Still, all four states did stay loyal, and this was a big factor in eventual Northern victory.

Related questions

What role did James McCulloch play in McCulloch v. Maryland 1819?

James McCulloch was cashier and head of the Baltimore, Maryland, branch of The Second Bank of the United States who refused to pay a new tax the State of Maryland attempted to impose on the bank. McCulloch was the nominal defendant in Maryland's case against the federal government in the state courts, and the petitioner in the US Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819).Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)For more information about McCulloch v. Maryland, see Related Links, below.


Which Supreme Court case prevented states from taxing the federal government?

McCulloch v. Maryland prevented states from taxing the federal government. The state of Maryland was trying to impose a tax on all bank notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. At the time, the only bank of this sort in Maryland was the Second Bank of the United States.


Who was president during the mcculloch v Maryland case?

James Monroe


What did the supreme court case McCulloch v Maryland settle?

McCulloch v. Maryland settled that the National Bank was constitutional. Also it settled that Maryland does not have the power to tax a institution created by congress.


How does the McCulloch vs. Madison case impact american history?

vs. MARYLAND


What are the perspective of both sides in the McCulloch vs Maryland case?

black people


What is an example of national supremacy?

McCulloch v. Maryland.An example of national supremacy clause can be seen in the case McCulloch v. Maryland.


What public policy does the case of McCulloch vs Maryland enforces?

Jake Henderson was here :)


How did the ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland contribute to strengthening the national government?

How did the Supreme Court’s ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland strengthen the federal government ?The court case known as McCulloch v. Maryland of March 6, 1819, was a seminal Supreme Court Case that affirmed the right of implied powers, that there were powers that the federal government had that were not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, but were implied by it.


The case of McCulloch v. Maryland determined that states could not tax the federal government.?

true


In which case did john marshall cite the necessary and proper clause of the constitution?

McCulloch v. Maryland


Which case basically outlawed state taxes being on the federal government?

McCulloch vs Maryland