Who will win the war US or Russia?
The United States alone has a much more powerful military then the Russians, not to mention in said war, NATO would fight along side them. That means that two of the other most powerful countries, The United Kingdom ans France, would aid america. The combined power of the American Navy Seals and the SAS, considered the two special forces in the world, would be able to eliminate key operatives, while a NATO coalition, led by the US, Uk, France, and probably Germany, would fight directly.
3 people found this useful
The Korean War was fought between the Russians (Soviets) and the US; using North & South Koreans, and free world troops, and using the peninsula of Korea (the country of Korea) as a battleground.. The Soviet Union and United States TESTED there equipment against each other. Korea was a testing grou…nd between the US & Soviets. (MORE)
If you mean only the USA and Russia (not including us allies) theUSA because it has a technological upper hand by far plus Russiahasn't got a great navy either. USA is #1 === What kind of war doesn't have nukes. Russia would win with nukes. === If nukes are ever used between the 2 - NOBODY wins. The… devastationto not only the two countries but the collateral damage to the restof the world would likely cause a complete collapse ofcivilization. Who would win in a no-nukes war would depend a lot on where the warwas fought. Each country would have a distinct advantage fightingon their own home turf. Napoleon and Hitler both found out howfoolish it was to try to fight Russia in Russian territory. (MORE)
Yes it did Russia beated the Germans and America beated Japan. America was afraid that all the Europe and the glory will have Soviet Union and it rushed to Germany
Both Russia and America wanted to try and develop a new "World Government" that allowed different interests such as America's government, with religion and freedom, but restricted many military ideas such as nuclear warfare and other such world laws.
Australia, because Australia has allies like the United States of America. The USA would not allow Australia to fall to Russia (rivalry). The USA would have on their side Japan, United Kingdom, Israel, Germany, Canada and the United Nations would properly stand behind the USA. Australia would not …need nuclear weapons, because they have a the USA's, the UK's, and China's. They also have an incredible fighting spirit just look up the ANZAC. Also Australia has it's close economic allie China, who are not the biggest fans of the Russians. China could easily take out Russia with a single order. As well as Australia has New Zealand, and who would want to fight New Zealand. Thats bull if the Aussies fought Russia one on one they would be wiped off the face of the earth. Plus China couldn't defeat Russia. The Russian Army is better trained and has far better equipment. Most Chinese equipment is old Soviet-era technology. (MORE)
the Soviet Union contributed the most in destroying the third Reich. The Eastern Front was the biggest front and the majority of the Nazi Force were sittuated there. In fact they played such a big role, that many experts agree that if there wasnt a Western Front, it would still hae only been a matte…r of Tim for the Soviet Union to win. Ps: Russia was the first country to enter Berlin, it was the country to demolish the reichstag and it still has the trophy eagle, from the reichstag un the Moscow WA museum. (MORE)
To the moron who wrote "USA has most advanced army and a jet that can go 12,000 miles and hour" your just a typical hypocrite and are a waste to forums like this so shut your facist trap. First of all America and Russia both have advanced weapons and fighter jets. Russia holds the worlds most nuk…es and Russia has the worlds largest landmass. USA has more people than Russia and has a more advanced military than Russia . USA has a higher population that Russia. At the moment it would be a tie since USA could never take over Russias landmass and Russia could never reach all their army to USA. It would end up in nukes. (MORE)
The United States, then and now. The US should win but since the military of defense eliminated half of our super large bombs to show other countries that we arent a threat "dont start a war", but we should WIN and we WILL if there ever is one... Edit: this is Wrong,Wrong ,Wrong,Wrong we won WW…| but just barely losing great amounts of soldiers. we won WW|| and also there we would of lost, if not of the Native Americans were here to help. we stalemated(Tie) with Korea everyone saying we won be really all we did was kill innicent Koreon's and bomb there civilians. we're basically losing in Afghanistan and we called back our men in Iraq so we pretty much lost there. also we only did half the job in WW|| the Russians were the ones that toke Hitler down all we did was the easy job in japan. im just saying if we fight Russia we are going to lose there going to lose aswell because we would be spending great amounts of money just trying to kill them and there military system is just aswell same as ours. and the U.S. is already millions of dollors in dept. plus they're population is bigger then us. there country is the biggest in the world. so we'll both be crippled from the war. Edit: The U.S is actually in $17 Trillion debt. And just because Russia is geologically larger, it doesn't give them such an advantage that they will win just on that basis. And the Russian population is 145 Million and the U.S's population is 300 Million. (MORE)
it lost it. usa had invaded canada. where it was defeated bigtime. it had no army at all.that is why talking to the bristish. was a better option to pres.madason
The army who would win is Russia because they have a better army. then Russia also has is they got is better weapons.
It would be 50/50 depending on if allies are allowed or not. If no allies then America would probably just win due to superior technology. If Russia performed a surprise attack they would win due to having a quite good military and would leave America little time to react by which time they woul…d be destroyed. If allies were allowed America would win easily due to close ties with the UK as the UK has about the second best military in the world (after America) so that's the best and the second best together making a formidable force and that's not counting the EU who would help the UK, Russia would get China but lets face it all they have is loads of unskilled people and poor technology (they are a backward country in many ways). To sum up America would come out on top in most situations. If nukes are involved we are all going to die. (MORE)
It would be 50/50 depending on where it was. Assuming the war did not go nuclear, the United States has the most technically advanced military giving them a big advantage in conventional war, however, it really depends on who attacks who first. Regardless of which, the war would be enormous. It w…ould easily dwarf WWII and the lives of Americans and Russians would greatly be changed. It would not be hard to assume that a large majority of the invaded population would be killed. And in the case of the United States, a loss of democracy and an installment of a police state that would be hard to get ride of for years to come. Due to the fact that liberty would be dropped to help the war effort such as the draft, limitless president terms etc. think of the Patriot act but 10 times more so. It would be a reasonable prediction that the US would win the war (don't forget US allies such as NATO), but it would be an extremely heavy pyrrhic victory. So much so that the country wouldn't really even be the US anymore but something new. To put it blunt there would be no winner. Advantages/Russia Russias biological Weapon systems out number U.S. and Russias tanks,helicopters,vehicals outnumber U.S's Advantages/U.S. U.S's infantry are highly trained,so as helicopter pilots,tank drivers,vehicals and any plane fighters are convoy pilots. U.S. technology is greater then Russias. U.S. has more task force specilized armed fources then Russia. U.S. has more allies like,Canadian armed fources,UK armed fources,Europe specilized task fource. Although it depends where the war happends.if Russia attacked unknowingly U.S. would have a devastanting critical hit.(CoD MW2)even if so U.S. armed forces and the natinol guard would be alerted before Russia would even get to fire one round on U.S. soil. task forces would be alerted,allies would be called in and Russia will probly be flanked from all directions. if U.S. attacked unknowingly they wouldent do it in fource(probly like Russia would)they would send in U.S. navy seals to one side and send in task forces to wipe all natinol defence then come in like WW|| but risk surrounding countrys. if they did use nukes the whole world would turn on either country who started the war. (MORE)
In terms of military strength, the United States has a history of superior equipment though Russia has a history of larger numbers. At the end of World War II, the United States would have had a good chance as the country was still mobilized from the war and Soviet Russia had been weakened by the Ge…rman invasion. In addition to that there would also have been enthusiastic support from Poland. At the time of the Cold War, a direct confrontation could have gone either way. As far as the nuclear bombs are concerned, both countries possessed them and still do. Both countries had enough nuclear bombs to annihilate the other countries and permanently targeted at important cities. There would have been enough time for any country launched on to launch a retaliatory strike, most likely resulting in nuclear winter and the end of the world as we know it. That is largely the reason why neither country could risk a direct confrontation. (MORE)
In the 2012 London Summer olympics, Russia won a total of 82 medals. Russia has won 498 medals in the history of the olympic games. In the London olympics, the United States won a total of 104 medals. The States has won 2652 medals in the history of the olympic games.
Because they did. Because they were awesome and their hats were the best hats ever! The non-communists lost because they were losers and didn't like cheese.
It would be a close fight. China has more men to fight with. China also has more reserves. China has unquestionably better navies and air forces when compared to Russia, and around 9 times the amounts of tanks. China has the largest army in human history, more than the entire population of the Unite…d States. So, in a short war, China would win. In a longer war, China would win and begin to take Russian lands, eventually scoring the victory. This is of course assuming no nuclear weapons are used. Otherwise, China would also win. Answer: China would win without really trying. (MORE)
probably the United States as currently the Russian economy is worse off than ours and probably can't field a decent military, not to mention the United stateshas a more expirenced corps of soldiers that are also better equiped. If you are talking about the soviet union which was desolved in the ear…ly 90s any outcome of such a theoretical situation would rely on the time and location of conflict and cause of the war. I have a feeling that you can't answer that question without a specific set of circumstances. (MORE)
USA. They got more nukes and we got the first death star prototype in california. http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/090408-tw-laser-fusion.html
Well, I think the Russian Federation would win, because it has the 3rd largest armed forces in the world, the most nukes, and it has China, Iraq, Pakistan, India, and MOST Alaskans on it's side. China has the largest armed forces in the world, India has the 5th largest, and Pakistan and Iraq combine…d would have a pretty big @$$ chance of being a superpower (or at least a major power.). China has the 3rd most nukes in the world, India has tonnages of em', and so does Pakistan.(or well at least a dozen or... mabye...possibly...more than likely...less.) China , and India are the 1st and 3rd most populated countries in the world, Russia, China and India are some of the largest nations in the world, with Russia and China being 1st and 2nd. So, Russia well, as we all know that usa alliance [Nato], have most modern weapon then Russia's alliance. Also American have gone into many war,so their experience is higher then russia. (MORE)
USA will win because of advanced technology and mor nuclear weapons along with better money and more experience
They both have nukes, so we would all be dead. But excluding nukes, russia have a lot more men than Britain so id say Russia
well ithink usa but if usa win i wont ever be th coutry it was everybody will be poor
The Americans have more advanced technology, we have more intelligence and more firepower than the Russians.
It was the Cold War,which started in 1945,and ended in 1991,but there are still tensions between the two countries today.
If it's just the two countries head to head it would be Russia because their military is a larger. but if allies came into play then probably uk as U.S.A is good friends with uk
In ww1 yes they used it but it was rebuild and renamed in russia after they foundout about the weapon. As of ww2 no it was no longer used.
Russia, then called the Soviet Union, supplied America's enemy with weapons. The Soviet Union (Russia) was a cold war enemy. Russia (Soviet Union) and America never officially fought each other. Russia (Soviet Union) and America were allies only during WWII.
Due to current events, not a total war, but we are being drawn toanother cold war
If they fought a limited war it could go either way, depending on the circumstances, but I have trouble envisioning a limited war with nukes. Once the first nuke is detonated, it will probably lead to more nukes, with no limits, and no winners.
All wars with all nations, excepting Vietnam. Correction: On a technical scale, the U.S. has never lost a war. The Korean and Vietnam wars were called to cease fires, except for the fact that we made the last push in Korea so the U.S. had a lasting impression, whereas North Vietnam struck again rig…ht as we left. (MORE)
No. Nukes created the cold war. . Perhaps they kept the cold war cold, but they did not create it! Without them it is very likely it would have become a hot war before Stalin's death.
The russia was the first one to invade German capital and u.s. and other alliences helped. Germany reached as far as Stalingrad but was shut down by freezing temperatures and was forced to retreat, by the time they decided to do that the was was already lost and Berlin was captured. Some people s…ay they won and some people say they lost. The Soviet Union (Russia) was part of the Allies and the Allies achieved victorious. (MORE)
China's nuclear arsenal was based on a policy of minimum deterrence - that is, only enough were built to deter someone from casting the first stone in a nuclear showdown. However, they'd still be capable of wreaking enough havoc on both countries that there really would be no winner in the end. The… United States would win against both of those countries combined. (MORE)
If nuclear weapons were used, no. Both would lose, along with every other country in the world. If nuclear weapons were not used, it would depend on who was attacking who. Any invasion of Russia would have to be a perfectly executed strike, crushing all major and organised resistance within months,… otherwise it becomes a war of attrition and there is plenty of history to show what happens then. An invasion of the US would have to cross several oceans, or proceed through other countries (who would of course, not be friendly to any invading force). Hence, it is unlikely a decent foothold could be established. (MORE)
I suppose you are referring to The Cold War. That was not a war in which nations did formal declarations of war but rather it was understood and they played a 5 decades long game of arm race, spying and making threats (such as the Cuban Missile Crisis.) Anyway Stalin was the leader of the Soviet Uni…on when the Cold War started during the last months of World War 2. (MORE)
In the event of a nuclear war there are no winers - the concept is of mutually assured destruction.
Yes, there was a 'Cold War' between the Soviet Union (Russia) and the USA from 1946 to 1990. It was called a cold war because the relations between the Russians and the USA were very cold, and it was almost an undeclared war.
Land combat: China has a larger population (1/5 of the whole world) to fight with and much better trained soldiers (search up chinese marines vs us marines) Airborne combat: Russia would definitely lose the war in the air. The have almost 5x as many planes as the Chinese air force. but they are… technecally inferior to china's j-10s Naval combat: Russia would lose, simply because of their inferior soveit era surface ships. They do however have the advantage of more submarines. Cyberspace: china's numerous attacks have already caused mass havoc to the us imagine against an almost undefended russia (MORE)
Because Russia wanted nuckes and we wanted nukes so it was all about who got them first
The war between USA and USSR( Now Russia) happened a few years later after World War II. They're the 2 strongest nations in the world. It was caused by disagreements with the 2 countries. The USA believes in freedom & big business. The USSR is communist. It was called the Cold war. After the Cold wa…r, they made a space competition to get to the moon. USSR launched their rocket first but USA made it towards the moon. (MORE)
it would obviously be Russia,why? because they are one of the worlds most strongest countries in war, they have WAY developed weapons and technology and their land is really big! so they can get more resources, while vatican city only has a population of 800 people and they are the smallest country …in the world and you'll know that if you are learning history, you will not see a word that says Vatican city, because they don't have much developed things and their army will just be a few hundreds of people. (MORE)
They were on the side of the Allies. And they had an alliance with Serbia, so they had no choice but to join.
The US didn't declare war on Russia. The "cold war" refers only to the hostility of each country towards eachother.
It is likely that US might win the war. Russia could defeat both India and China together, but they would get a lot of their soldiers lost in the battle. US has much better weapons and better, trained soldiers than Russia, making it more powerful.
There was the Russian Civil War. Russian people were revolting against Stalin and the USSR military went in to stop them.
The answer to your question is because Hitler was dead at least a couple days before the war ended. The only reason why the war was ended so abruptly is because they found Hitler's dead body in a bunker.
No one side would any nuclear battle. Since nuclear fallout is carried on the wind and within water, the entire world would lose. _____________________________________________________________ Answer It's unlikely but if it did happen it would be very Here are the points why that Russia wo…uld could beat America in a Nuclear Battle/War . USA stores most of it's nuclear waste on YuccaMountain, If the Russians hit that with a Nuclear Weapon, America would be covered in Radioactive gas . Russia more Nuclear Weapons and more advanced ones than America. . Russia could destroy America's supply lines (NOTE:80% of US Medicine is transported a broad via AirCraft of Ship. . Russia has large land area (nearly twice as America, so difficult to wipe out who country) . America is a more congestive country, so easy targets e.g. NY and Texas etc.. However here is the more positive side why America could win a Nuclear Battle . Got more advanced Aircrafts with greater bomb capacity, also bigger numbers . US has got more Oil Supplies than Russia . US have large numbers of Naval Ships and Nuclear Submarines (easily go under radar and attack Russia's major ports. . Russia is in boarder with several major countries, so Russia could drag other countries like UK, Germany Japan and China into the "battle" then led into a Nuclear War. However, neither could win due to if a Nuclear Battle/War did Happen, the amount of radiation would practically end live. However, like I said before, It's very unlikely that it would happen due to both countries agree to reduce the numbers of Nuclear Weapons and agree to be friendly/neutral with each other. Theres like 1:100 thousand chance of a Nuclear War happening unless one or both countries has a government like Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin. (MORE)
Kinda. Like the other conflicts of the Cold War, it was "proxy war" between a Soviet-backed communist country and an American-backed capitalist country. Unlike the Americans, the Soviets didn't send troops to Korea, but they did provide North Korea with tanks and military equipment. Also, some Sovie…t fighters pilots participated in the year. (MORE)
Although a Nuclear war between the US and Russia is always possible it will most likely never happen. The US and Russia are the only two nations that have a Launch on warning system which is an alert to send interceptor missiles to destroy the incoming attack.
The US would never fight a conventional war with China or Russia,but might support a country that did (as with Afghanistan from 1979to 1989). Russia has a much larger conventional army, and China aneven larger one. Any armed conflict would likely lead to a nuclearexchange, either limited or total. R…ussia has parity with the US innuclear weapons, while China is still a distant 3rd. (MORE)