What would you like to do?

Why are checkpoints legal if police need probable cause to make a traffic stop?

already exists.

Would you like to merge this question into it?

already exists as an alternate of this question.

Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?

exists and is an alternate of .

It depends on the type of motorist checkpoint. Roadblocks, as they are referred to by the courts, fall under what is known as a special needs exception to the 4th Amendment. The special needs exception requires that the primary purpose of the search/seizure be for regulatory, not law enforcement, purposes. Under this theory, things like drivers license/vehicle registration checkpoints pass muster because the purpose is to ensure motorists have complied with state licensing requirements. And as stated below, if there are observable signs of other wrongdoing, police may also gain probable cause for further searches at this type of checkpoint. DUI checkpoints require more though. When police officers extend the checkpoint from checking licensing with passive observation for signs of intoxication to actively testing every driver for intoxication (e.g. flashlight tests, simple cognitive tests, etc...), the purpose has shifted from regulatory to criminal enforcement. In Michigan v. Sitz, the court effectively ignored the regulatory requirement of special needs searches in coming to their holding that DUI checkpoints fall under the special needs exception (the court also likened DUI checkpoints to airport and boarder checks without addressing that there is no other way for the interests protected by those checks to be advanced). Rather, the court merely recognized that there was a compelling government interest, and that DUI checkpoints were a means of advancing that interest. In a later case, Indianapolis v. Edmond, the Supreme Court held that "narcotics checkpoints" were an unconstitutional violation of the 4th Amendment. While these checkpoints were identical to DUI checkpoints, except that police would also lead a drug dog around the motorists vehicle. The court refused to extend the special needs exception where the "primary purpose" is "to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing." As such, motorist checkpoints are legal only so long as the primary purpose is regulatory rather than general criminal enforcement, except in the anomolous DUI checkpoint situation, and in boarder or airport security checks. Answer A checkpoint is not a traffic stop. While it depends on the state, in Texas, a person is required to furnish their license on the request of a peace officer while operating a motor vehicle on a public roadway. Therefore, the checkpoint, primarily, is designed to ascertain whether the person is legally operating a motor vehicle. And, if the peace officer has reasonable suspicion to believe a person is intoxicated, he may perform a Field Sobriety Test. Answer A checkpoint isn't a stop. It's designed with safety in mind, such as a seatbelt check. When they approach the vehicle to see that you're wearing a seatbelt, they also observe the driver to see if he/she is intoxicated. Since it's illegal to drive intoxicated and they observed you drive, they can stop you. Answer I believe they get away with it because their checkpoints are announced publicly. They are in the newspaper, on the police departments website, and even sometimes the news will say it. This goes along too with "hiding places" you know when they sit in someone's driveway or so. Also, checkpoints are very well visible. If you think you might be stopped or questioned and you have something to worry about, stay put, or find another way out. All vehicles pass through the checkpoint and therefore any of the vehicles are subject to being stopped, the driver and passengers being asked for identification and so forth. Such action does not legally constitute profiling or harassment. Answer In British Columbia Canada we often have check points and it is about seat belts (very strict here) as well as to check to see that the driver is not intoxicated. Police officers have that right. We see many cars pulled over and abandoned for towing.
Answer Because the Supreme Court ruled in Michigan Department of State Police vs. Sitz that it was constitutional. The majority acknowledge that it violates the 4th amendment, but said that the state interest in reducing drunk driving outweighed the infringement. The dissenting justices pointed out that there is no "state interest" clause or anything else in the Constitution to provide an exception.
+ 29 others found this useful
Thanks for the feedback!

Does a police officer need probable cause to search persons?

Define what YOU mean by "search." Your definition may well be different from what the law calls a search. If a law officer does a routine interrogation stop on you, they may p

Are police able to make traffic stop in driveway?

Yes. Being on private property does not insulate you from law enforcement. If police observe something that warrants a traffic stop, they can make it regardless of whether you

Can a police officer give a ticket when they do not have probable cause to make a traffic stop?

Police do not need probable cause to pull you over, they need reasonable suspicion. However, If you can prove that your actions were in accordance with your laws the ticket ca

Can detectives make a traffic stop?

Yes any type of officer has the authority to make a traffic stop, though is very unlikely a detective will have the means to even make a traffic stop.

Does a police officer needs probable cause to make you get out of the vehicle?

It CAN depend on the circumstances prevailing at the time of the stop, but it is within the officer's discretion. It has been ruled permissible, having to do with officer safe

How does probable cause impact police officers and police agencies?

Probable cause is the standard of evidence for charging someone with a criminal offense (for the purpose of this discussion, this includes traffic offenses, which are not nece

What qualifications do you need to be in the traffic police?

Depending on the specific agency, the geographic location and municipality type (city, town or county), becoming a local police patrol officer or traffic cop can begin with a

Is it legal for police officers to demand your social security number for a traffic stop Can you refuse to give it?

  Yes, a police officer can request this if you have no other forms of identification and they need to make a determination of your identity. If there is no other way and

Can you legally tape record a police officer during a traffic stop?

Some states have laws that prohibit making a sound recording of any communication unless all of the parties have been advised the recording is being made. This applies even if

Does a police officer need probable cause for a traffic stop?

NO!   A police officer needs reasonable suspicion. That means that  they must have articulable facts that when presented in the  totality of the circumstances a person

Is hearsay probable cause for a traffic stop?

Yes. For example if you are driving and suspect a drunk driver you can call 911 on your cell phone and they can pull the car over based on that phone call. If needed they can