# Why are there no zero in Roman numerals?

Would you like to merge this question into it?

#### already exists as an alternate of this question.

Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?

#### exists and is an alternate of .

In our system, based on tens, we add a zero to the end of a number to increase its value by ten. So 1 x ten becomes 10 and 10 times ten becomes 100 etc. We use zeros within numbers to indicate that there are no numbers in that column, so 102 means there is 1 x 100, no x 10s and 2 x units. The Romans had a different system were they used different symbols to denote tens, hundreds and thousands etc. So in Roman numerals 1 x ten is X and X times ten is C. The Romans simply missed out numerals which weren't needed so 102 in Roman numerals was CII (100 + 2). As they didn't add a zero to the end of numbers or use one within numbers they had no need to invent a symbol to represent zero. During the Middle Ages monks, who still wrote in Latin and still used Roman numerals, introduced the numeral N to represent zero (based on the Latin word Nulae, meaning nothing)
3 people found this useful

# Why didn't the Romans use zero in Roman Numerals?

There was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it

# What is the Roman numeral for zero?

there is no roman numeral for it Another answer : The Romans had no numeral to represent zero because there was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus

# Is there a roman numeral for zero?

In general, the number zero did not have its own Roman numeral, but a primitive form ( nulla ) was known by medieval computists (responsible for calculating the date of E

# Why is there no zero in roman numerals?

because there is there no 0 for roman numerals the lowest number is I and that is 1 and there is no number smaller then 1 so that means that 1 is the smallest number. . (

# Why there is no zero in the Roman numeral system?

The Roman had no zero because they didn't need one. We have numbers from 1 to 9 and then add a zero to represent tens, a second zero to represent 100s and so on. The Romans si

# Why are there no roman numerals for zero?

Because their system is based on adding numbers ob so a zero is not nessaCary it is like instead of 5+10+20+5+60=100 you write 5+0+10+0+20+0+5+0+60=100

# How do you write zero in Roman numerals?

Zero does not exist in roman numerals

No.

# How do you write the number zero in roman numerals?

The Romans did not have a 0 in the numerals but it is recognised that 'N' could be used from the Latin word nulla meaning "none"

# What is the Roman numerals for zero?

The Roman numeral system had no zero. The Roman numeral system had no zero. The Roman numeral system had no zero. The Roman numeral system had no zero. The Roman numeral s

# Did Romans have a zero in their numeral system?

Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to w

# Is N zero in Roman numerals?

Yes but it's never used because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.

It is: 0 = N

# Why is there no roman numeral for zero?

Because zero is not needed in Roman numerals as the positional place value of these numerals are self evident.

# Why does the Roman numerals do not have any zero?

Because it's not needed as the positional place values of the numerals are self evident

# How can you represent Zero in Roman Numerals?

It can't be represented by any symbol. Another Answer:- The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numera