answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

We, of course, have the luxury of high-sight and the simple answer is no. But back in the day it wasn't so easy to tell. The sensible thing for Hitler to have done was to be satisfied with his gains and not keep over-reaching himself. The Allies were hoping Hitler would be sensible and were surprised when he wasn't. Hitler you have to understand kept on over-reaching himself even through-out the thick of the war. (He should have never attacked Russia, or declared war on the US).

Now the allies had good reason to not get involved in a war with Germany as the German war machine was good. Look what happened to France. England would have fallen too if Hitler had kept his focus and not gone tearing after the largest military power in the world. (Russia)

Now consider the US's war on Iraq. Should they have left Saddam alone or was it better that they end up where they are now?

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

We, of course, have the luxury of high-sight and the simple answer is no. But back in the day it wasn't so easy to tell. The sensible thing for Hitler to have done was to be satisfied with his gains and not keep over-reaching himself. The Allies were hoping Hitler would be sensible and were surprised when he wasn't. Hitler you have to understand kept on over-reaching himself even through-out the thick of the war. (He should have never attacked Russia, or declared war on the US).

Now the allies had good reason to not get involved in a war with Germany as the German war machine was good. Look what happened to France. England would have fallen too if Hitler had kept his focus and not gone tearing after the largest military power in the world. (Russia)

Now consider the US's war on Iraq. Should they have left Saddam alone or was it better that they end up where they are now?

Read more: Until_1938_Britain_and_France_basically_ignored_Hitler's_foreign_policydo_you_think_this_was_wise

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did Great Britain and France ignore Hitler's foreign policies?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How did Hitlers economic policies differ from those Britain Italy and France used to confront the depression?

haha


What country reacted to hitlers actions?

Great Britain & France


How did going to rhineland fit into hitlers aims in mein kampf?

Because in Britain and France there was only little protests.


What was Hamilton's foreign Alliance?

his foreign alliance was with both France and Britain. He traded with both countries equally, though both Frace and Britain canstantly got into conflicts.


What did the nonintercourse act do?

America reopened trade with foreign countries except for France and Britain.


Why did Jefferson have difficult staying out of foreign affairs?

Jefferson had trouble avoiding involvement with foreign nations because Britain and France were in war and America could not decide who to help on the war because we trade with Britain and France was the one who help us on a battle.


Does France have any holidays?

Hitlers Birthday


Foreign policy of great Britain in the 1700's?

In the 1700s, Britain was focused on building a colonial empire in the New World. Its main rival was France.


What did congress do to ease the economic effects of the 1807 embargo?

Congress passed a less severe law that reopened foreign trade with every country except Britain and France.


Was there foreign influence on the Battle of Gettysburg?

France and Great Britain both decided not to support the confederates after their loss in Gettysburg


What three foreign countries have the most influence in Oceania?

USA dominant in Micronesia.USA, Britain, France, Chile and NZ in Polynesia. Australia, Indonesia and France in Melanesia.


What is some information about hitlers invasion of France?

it was very wrong.