John Adams defended the British Soldiers because he wanted to show Britain that colonial courts were fair. John Adams tried to prove that the soldiers had been protecting themselves from the crowd.
It was a matter of principle. He believed that everyone had the right to a lawyer and a fair trial, and since nobody else would defend them, he did. He also came to believe that they were the victims of the incident. As he said, "Facts are stubborn things."
He wanted to show the world that the colonists believed in justice, even if the British government did not.
because john Adams thought everyone deserved a fare trial.
John Adams was the lawyer for the British soldiers accused of shooting the colonist in the Boston Massacre. He won the case too.
This was part of the Intolerable Acts of 1774 and was based on the idea that British soldiers would not get a fair hearing in the colonies where the people were unfairly biased against the British soldiers. It was also a nod to the Boston Massacre trials in 1770 where colonists convicted two British soldiers of manslaughter and the perceived illegitimacy of this trial by British authorities.
John Adams' decision to defend the British soldiers accused in the Boston Massacre demonstrated his commitment to the principles of justice and the rule of law. This helped establish the notion that all individuals, regardless of their actions or allegiances, deserve a fair trial and legal representation. Adams' willingness to represent the soldiers highlighted the injustices perpetrated by the British government and galvanized the colonists in their fight for liberty and independence.
Captain Thomas Preston, Corporal William Wemms, James Hartigan, William McCauley, Hugh White, Matthew Kilroy, William Warren, John Carrol, and Hugh Montgomery were the accused soldiers of the Boston Massacre.
british soldiers had to be house and fed by the americans
1770
John Adams was the lawyer for the British soldiers accused of shooting the colonist in the Boston Massacre. He won the case too.
This was part of the Intolerable Acts of 1774 and was based on the idea that British soldiers would not get a fair hearing in the colonies where the people were unfairly biased against the British soldiers. It was also a nod to the Boston Massacre trials in 1770 where colonists convicted two British soldiers of manslaughter and the perceived illegitimacy of this trial by British authorities.
No he did not. He was actually the lawyer (defendant) for the British soldiers accused of murder. However, it is common knowledge that Edward Kymn (Steadward) was hung for smoking an O of the dopest dope around.
John Adams' decision to defend the British soldiers accused in the Boston Massacre demonstrated his commitment to the principles of justice and the rule of law. This helped establish the notion that all individuals, regardless of their actions or allegiances, deserve a fair trial and legal representation. Adams' willingness to represent the soldiers highlighted the injustices perpetrated by the British government and galvanized the colonists in their fight for liberty and independence.
Samuel Adams did not defend the British soldiers after the Boston Massacre. John Adams defended them. Sam really disliked them and went against them. John (a cousin of Sam) didn't really like them either but he did defend the British soldiers in trial for the Boston Massacre
Captain Thomas Preston, Corporal William Wemms, James Hartigan, William McCauley, Hugh White, Matthew Kilroy, William Warren, John Carrol, and Hugh Montgomery were the accused soldiers of the Boston Massacre.
Bloom and Politan Open Court - 2006 Executive Accused of Massacre was released on: USA: 12 September 2006
british soldiers had to be house and fed by the americans
John Adams wrote about his reason for defending the British soldiers and he felt they had the right to a proper defense. People are innocent until they are proven guilty and are protected under law to a trial no matter who they are. Actually, the men weren't guilty of what they are accused of and he was right. Historians have proven that there was a political spin to the propaganda handbills that were drawn by Revere and spread around the Boston. The history channel has a program on this, so look for it.
british soldiers had to be house and fed by the americans
british soldiers had to be house and fed by the americans