they are lazy
150 milliuon
30 percent
Yes- all registered voters in the US can vote for a congressman to represent his district in the House.
Eligible voters are required by law to vote in elections.
Mabe because they don't no which to vote for.
You are eligible to vote in the US when you turn 18. If you can vote in a presidential election, you may be eligible to vote in the primary, even if you are 17.
No, you vote for the US Senator for your specific senatorial district.
Elegible and registered
All registered voters are entitled to vote for the state's US senators. Of course they never have 100% turn-out and there is always the possibility in any election that some voters will be illegally denied a chance to vote. That is why both parties assign people to watch the polls.
The age is 18. There are some rules that allow a 17 year old to vote in a primary election when they will be eligible to vote in at 18.
When you have an election (such as a US Presidential election) in which there are many millions of people who are eligible to vote, it becomes difficult to believe that your single vote will affect the outcome (although the US Presidential election was bizarrely close in the year 2000, and was decided by a margin of about 300 votes). If you cannot change the outcome of the election, what does your vote accomplish? Well, in a sense it does accomplish a number of things. It helps to create an atmosphere of voter participation, to encourage others to also vote, since all of these individual voters do influence the election collectively, even if they do not decide an election individually. In addition, even when a particular candidate or party loses an election, they do care about the number of votes that they got; a narrow defeat has a very different meaning for the political future of that candidate than a crushing defeat does. But many voters do not concern themselves with these implications of voting, and really are only thinking about whether their vote will determine the outcome of the election - and it won't.
To clarify: I mean by the question, has any president ever attracted 50% of votes from **all eligible voters**? We know that turnout in US elections these days is very low by global standards, so even a president who wins 60% of the popular vote has only received perhaps 40% of the support of all eligible voters. But has it ever been thus? Could any president actually claim a mandate from a majority of all those legally entitled to vote?