answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because no enemy truly deserves to have such long lasting damage. There is probably still fallout floating around the cities, which means that Japanese people who never did anything to America are still getting sick because of the nuke.

that is nothing more than their way of looking at it. and also it is perfectly okay in their eyes to believe the dropping of bomb was not justified....

everyone has the right to speech ...(At least in India...)

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Those who believe that using the atomic bomb on Japan at the end of WW2 was the right thing to do have several reasons for holding that belief.

One was the estimate that an invasion of Japan, the only alternative to the bomb, would have resulted in hundreds of thousands of American casualties, millions of Japanese dead, and would have prolonged the war for several more years. It was hoped that using the bomb would force a quick surrender, thus saving American lives. (In the midst of a war such as WW2, saving Japanese lives was not a significant consideration for the Americans making that decision.)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Probably those are people that doesn't been to combat and don't know the kind of decisions the leaders has to take.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Because it creates a big damage to a place where it is dropped and could kill many innocent people.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Japan was being fire bombed every day and the damage was greater than the Atom bomb and Japan would have to surrender before US invasion in Nov 1945

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do some people believe the dropping of the atomic bomb was not justified?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War 2 justified?

Most people think so.


Was the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?

Most people think so.


Did the us made the right desicion to drop the bomb?

This question doesn't have a yes or no answer. You can't say that dropping two atomic bombs that killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people is right. Yet you can't say that saving probably over a million of soldiers lives by dropping the bomb wasn't right. Dropping the atomic bombs has it's pro's and con's.


Who were involoved in the dropping of the atomic bombs in japan during World War 2?

people


What were the consequences of dropping atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki?

dead people poisend land.


Can murder be justified?

Murder can be justified in cases such as the preservation of human life or in the case of self defence. This is very controversial as many people believe that how can some one judge what is justified to what is not.


Should the Americans justified have dropped the Atomic Bomb on the Japanese?

No. there is no justification to killing that many innocent people in a war.


Did the US commit genocide by dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagaski?

Yes they did because it killed many people


Why were the Japenese against dropping the Atomic bomb?

Because it would kill hundreds of thousands of their people I mean seriously?......


What was the final solution of the atomic bomb dropping?

90,000-166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000-80,000 in Nagasaki dead.


What resulted from the dropping of the atomic bomb on hiroshima?

Many many dead people, a totally destroyed city and the Japanese surrender


Can dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshoma in 1945 be justified?

Whew. Good one. Some would say 'yes', because it convinced the Japanese to surrender earlier than they would have. Had the Japanese held out and not surrendered until after a land invasion of Japan, hundreds of thousands of people would have died in the ensuing conflicts. The atomic bombs convinced the Japanese that they could be destroyed without requiring a land invasion.