Also,
Difficult to "loop" surveys to check results. Caves/tunnels are linear.
Working underground is more hazardous (rock falls etc).
Transporting equipment is harder.
+++
From experience, the techniques differ so it's not a very fair comparison.
Iron ore bodies and ferruginous intrusions can affect compasses, in a few areas, but it's not a very widespread problem.
GPS does not work underground full-stop, any more than a portable telephone or other portable radio will work, as these use VHF radio signals that do not penetrate the ground to any extent. Cave radio-location of spot points from the land survace above them, uses a VLF induction method. GPS comes into its own for tying the cave survey to the surface topography, by locating the entrance(s) and other associated features.
The lack of a horizon is never a cave-surveying problem, because you sight the compass and clinometer at a lamp placed at the next survey point, not at the cave feature itself. This also negates the first answer about lack of visual site distances, although zig-zagging meanders with very short sight-lines are very hard to measure accurately over their full length thanks to many small but cumulative and random errors.
Caves are linear. Some are. Most contain at least one loop or other closure-giving feature, and there are well-proven methods for distributing the errors in closing loops. However accuracy is indeed harder to obtain in a purely linear passage.
"Hazardous". Well, yes, caves do contain natural, objective hazards, though rock falls are rare. Most caving accidents are personal slips, trips or falls. Anyway the surface landscape can carry its own hazards too!
Difficult transport. No more so than any other caving equipment. Less so if anything. Don't forget a cave can only be surveyed by cavers of sufficient experience to negotiate the place anyway! The basic surveying tools are water-resistant notebooks & pencils, fabric builders'-type tape-measure, compass and clinometer; and the last 2 are compact devices carried on lanyards worn round the neck.
Modern cave surveying increasingly uses small, portable electronic range-finders like the Leica "Disto" (trade-mark), which uses a low-powered laser. These are used by measuring to chosen points on the cave walls, or heights to unreachable ceilings, rather than target-lamps.
Cave depths are measured from the altitude of the upper most portion of the cave with the altitude of the lowest portion of the cave passage. In the case of a lava tube cave, the passage is related to the lava flowing down the slope of the landscape. Since a lava cave can be over 8 km long, it is possilble that the upper portion of the cave is over 300 meters higher than the lower portion of the cave. It can be very strenous to travel from the top of such a cave to the bottom and possibly back out the entrance from which you came. Ref: http://www.caverbob.com/lava.htm
It depends on the person, both work equally hard depending on their drive and projects.
A somewhat loose word for a large cave, applicable either to an impressively large chamber ('room' in US caving terminology) or to the whole cave. The word is really only used in cave names, especially by show-cave owners for obvious reasons, and is rather archaic. The "standard" words throughout the English-speaking caving world are "Cave" for the entire structure, irrespective of form, complexity and dimensions, and "Chamber" (or "Room") for a single void within the system, and significantly larger than the passages entering it.
With more than 350 miles of surveyed passageways, Mammoth Cave is at least 3 times longer than any cave known. How long might it be? Geologists estimate that there could be as many as 600 miles of yet undiscovered passageways.
The chinese did panning as well as abit of cradling.The chinese worked harder than the european's and they worked at night
geomatics differ with surveying in that it encompasses a broad range of disciplines than surveying,let alone surveying is a discipline under geomatics
Water is heavier than air and is harder to push against resulting in a harder work-out. For this reason atheletes and horses are sometimes trained in water, this gives them a harder work-out, making their performance on land that much easier.
many different types of animals in the sea then on land
I can't quite see what you are asking. Do you mean 'Why is it more difficult to carry someone on land rather than in the water'?
They are harder to get over than flat land. They would take more time to travel over.
No. Slate is harder. Slate is shale that has been heated and compressed.
No, Limestone is harder than chalk.
No, diamond is harder than enamel.
No. Diamond is harder than emerald.
no, teeth are harder than rocks
we basically are in the land sea and air and we go on far harder missions than in any other branch in the military.
It is harder to walk on moon than on earth