The experiment you describe is unethical for two reasons. In the first place, the fetus in question is a human being who will have a greatly reduced quality of life as a result of the fetal alcohol syndrome that you caused by means of your experiment, which is a violation of human rights. In the second place, the experiment is entirely unnecessary, since there are lots of irresponsible women who have consumed excessive amounts of alcohol while pregnant and have given birth to babies who suffer from fetal alcohol syndrome, so we already know what the medical consequences are, of alcohol consumption during pregnancy.
Unethical. Period.
Very unethical
Spraying apples at a grocery store with experimental medicines (Study Island)
it would be were it not for the fact that it is unethical to use it (not that that gets in many people's way).
Spraying apples at a grocery store with experimental medicines (Study Island)
This is highly unethical - humans have the right to know what is being done to them. However, there are some arguments for this being ethically acceptable, mostly based upon the volunteer status of the military in the United States.
In my opinion it is unethical.
The unethical child was grounded for 2 months.
Stanley Milgram's experiment investigated the effect of authority on people's willingness to do unethical things, stemming from the experiences of the Holocaust. I think his hypothesis was that if people are pressured by a person of authority to do something, they will do it, even if it is against their moral code.
Unethical and illegal.
unethical competition in business?
It is unethical in itself and dangerous as a precedent.