answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U. S. Constitution pertains to the rights of slave owners regarding slaves who escaped to another state. It was therefore rendered moot when slavery was made illegal by the ratification of the 13th Amendment.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

It deals with fugitive slaves that no longer applies.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

it's obsolete because the number of representatives in the house of reps used to increase with the nations growing population but became fixed at 435 where it remains today

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Clause 3

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is clause three of Article IV Section 2 no longer in effect?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Why might some people say Article 7 of the Constitution is no longer needed?

Why are some people say that Article BIO is no longer needed


What is the fourth article of the constitution about?

Article 4 concerns the states. Section 1 mandates that all states will honor the laws of all other states; this ensures, for example, that a couple married in Florida is also considered married by Arizona, or that someone convicted of a crime in Virginia is considered guilty by Wyoming. Section 2 guarantees that citizens of one state be treated equally and fairly like all citizens of another. It also says that if a person accused of a crime in one state flees to another, they will be returned to the state they fled from. This section also has a clause dealing with fugitive slaves that no longer applies. Section 3 concerns the admittance of new states and the control of federal lands. Section 4 ensures a republican form of government (which, in this case, is synonymous with "representative democracy," and both of which are opposed to a monarchical or aristocratic scheme - the state derives its power from the people, not from a king) and guarantees that the federal government will protect the states against invasion and insurrection.


Who brought prohibition back?

no one. prohibition is no longer in effect.


If a section of the constitution is no longer in use that is nearly always because it has been?

it has been changed by an amendment


What was the US Supreme Court case of 1886 that prevented states from regulating railroads or other forms of interstate commerce?

Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois, (1886) resulted from a dispute between the railway company and the state of Illinois over shipping charges for transporting cargo from various cities in Illinois to cities in other states.Illinois law prohibited charging higher freight for moving goods shorter distances than for moving them longer distances, and imposed fines on railroad companies that failed to comply with their regulations. Specifically at issue was the fact Wabash charged more to transport goods from Gilman, Illinois, to New York than from Peoria, Illinois, to New York, even though the distance from Gilman to New York was 86 miles shorter.The US Supreme Court held that the Illinois statute prevented the state from regulating freight charges based on the specific point of departure, concluding that a voyage consisted of departure from anywhere in the interior of Illinois to New York (the ruling could be generalized to other states and destinations).The Court further held that the case involved a matter of "commerce among the states," which was properly regulated by Congress, not the States, per the US Constitution's Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and its Necessary and Proper Clause* (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18).The Court declared that the decision in Wabash did not establish a contrary doctrine to rulings in earlier cases, such as Munn v. Illinois, 94 U. S. 113 (1877); Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Iowa, 94 U. S. 155, (1876) and Peik v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway, 94 U. S. 164 (1876).The decision of the Illinois court was reversed, and the State's transportation statute struck down as unconstitutional.Ok just to make it earier the answer isWabash v. Illinois

Related questions

How many times can a president serves?

One may be ELECTED President for 2 terms. A person could serve longer if they succeed to the office of President (having formerly been the VP, or by serving in another of the official government posts outlined by the applicable presidential succession laws, which are contained in Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution; in Section 3 of the 20th Amendment; and in the 25th Amendment), and later being elected to the office.


Why might some people say Article 7 of the Constitution is no longer needed?

Why are some people say that Article BIO is no longer needed


In which sentence is the underlined clause an adverb clause modifying an adverb?

today's dig lasted longer than one yesterday is the correct answer. your welcome. 😎


How many full turns can a president serve?

One may be ELECTED President for 2 terms. A person could serve longer if they succeed to the office of President (having formerly been the VP, or by serving in another of the official government posts outlined by the applicable presidential succession laws, which are contained in Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution; in Section 3 of the 20th Amendment; and in the 25th Amendment), and later being elected to the office.


What is the fourth article of the constitution about?

Article 4 concerns the states. Section 1 mandates that all states will honor the laws of all other states; this ensures, for example, that a couple married in Florida is also considered married by Arizona, or that someone convicted of a crime in Virginia is considered guilty by Wyoming. Section 2 guarantees that citizens of one state be treated equally and fairly like all citizens of another. It also says that if a person accused of a crime in one state flees to another, they will be returned to the state they fled from. This section also has a clause dealing with fugitive slaves that no longer applies. Section 3 concerns the admittance of new states and the control of federal lands. Section 4 ensures a republican form of government (which, in this case, is synonymous with "representative democracy," and both of which are opposed to a monarchical or aristocratic scheme - the state derives its power from the people, not from a king) and guarantees that the federal government will protect the states against invasion and insurrection.


What does a sell - by date tell you?

the recommended time by which the article should be sold. Or, a time after which the article is no longer considered desirable


What is the difference between sunset laws and sunshine laws?

A sunset clause is a clause in a statute that specifies a date after which the law of which it is a part will no longer be in effect and will no longer have the force of law.Government-in-the-sunshine laws are laws that specify that the proceedings of governing processes such as governing councils or administrative tribunals are to be conducted in a public manner and that the incidents thereto and records thereof are made, and kept, publicly accessible. In some States, government-in-the-sunshine laws are specified in the State Constitution, and not merely in statute.


How does length effect the period of a pendulum?

A longer pendulum has a longer period.


Can you get section 8 for an apartment that you can no longer pay for landlord wants information for you to be able to stay in your apartment?

can you get section 8 for an apartment you are all ready rent but can no longer pay for landlord wants information for section 8 for renters and how you can get it.


How is the golden rectangle to the golden section?

The ratio of the shorter side of the rectangle to the longer side is the same as the ratio of the longer side to the sum of the two sides. And that ratio is the Golden section.


What were the problems of the educational system that the article says would no longer suffice?

Please rewrite. The question can not be answered because we don't have the article.


At what altitude does the Earth's gravity no longer have an effect on the astronauts or the space shuttle?

At what altitude does the Earth's gravity no longer have an effect on the astronauts or the space shuttle?