The Framers of the Constitution of the United States of 1787 were fearful of a standing army. They believed that the greatest threat to the liberty of a free people was a standing army. As such, they believed the best defense militarily are militias, which are citizen run volunteer units that only exist in the event of invasion, rebellion or insurrection.
The Navy, being necessary to protect a nation's interest abroad cannot be treated in the same manner as an Army. As such, the U.S. Constitution of 1787 separates the two branches because they serve ultimately two separate purposes. A standing army can potentially harm the rights and liberties of a free people, while a navy is essential in guaranteeing those rights and liberties of a free people.
No. The Army Air Corps was separated from the Army and redesignated the Air Force on September 18, 1947.
George Washington
One thing that is true about the Congress under the Articles of Confederation is that the Congress was mandated to maintain an army and navy.
Congress had the power to raise an Army by asking the States for troops.
second continental congress
Yes, it was proposed by John Adams that George Washington lead the Army
second continental congress
Under the Articles of Confederation, it was the responsibility of Congress to take care of foreign affairs, and make any proclamations of war or peace. It was also the job of Congress to make sure the army and navy were well maintained.
the revolutionary way
Yes, Congress has the power to organize and maintain a national army under the Constitution. This power is explicitly granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, Clause 12, known as the "Necessary and Proper Clause" or the "Elastic Clause." Therefore, if Congress deems it necessary, they can organize a national army.
true
yes