This is an outstanding question. On the atomic and molecular scale rotation tends to determine the spherical shape. Molecules do tend to organize in a spherical manner on a large scale as rain drops. However, should the raindrop grow too large as it falls neck instability tends to give it a barbell shape in which it will break into more than one sphere.
But besides rotation for planets they tend to "organize" around a center of mass and gravitational forces are at work here. I welcome additional comments on this subject.
No. It has no shape or dimensions. If it did, it would not be a point, it would be a very very very very small dot.
A ruler that can measure very small units.
A sphere is the shape that holds maximum volume for minimum amount of material for the container - glass. However, a spherical jar could roll off work surfaces: not very useful. So the best compromise is a flat base but a circular cross-section. That is, a cylinder.
It depends on the angle where the source of light is coming from. A example is where you stand still outside and the sun is almost on top of you your shadow is very small compared to you
Very small right
Usually it should be spherical. However, if it rotates very fast, it will be an elipsoid.Usually it should be spherical. However, if it rotates very fast, it will be an elipsoid.Usually it should be spherical. However, if it rotates very fast, it will be an elipsoid.Usually it should be spherical. However, if it rotates very fast, it will be an elipsoid.
When referring to size, something can be very small or very big. When referring to the shape, an item can be round, square, or even a triangle.
The shape of the Earth is very close to that of an oblate spheroid or oblate ellipsoid.
Nothing on the subatomic level is entirely definite, as described by Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, but within the limits of that uncertainty, yes, neutrons have a definite shape (spherical) and volume (which is very small).
On a very small scale, it is true.
It is not spinning at all.
Deimos is a very small moon, so small that it does not have enough gravity to make itself spherical.
Well, the most aerodynamic shape is a teardrop/raindrop shape. You would think a spherical car (assuming you means completely spherical) would be very aerodynamic. But that is false. The exit of the wind passing over/under/around your car is as important as when the wind hits it initially. So a spherical rear end would be much worse that a tapered rear end.
A small car.
Density is an intrinsic property, and as such it does not depend on the size of the object. A drop of water will have a density of 1g/ml whether it is a big drop, or a very small drop.
It is somebody or something that is the very best example of something.
The quick layman's answer is 'gravity'. Imagine an object with the same over-all density and mass as the earth, only it is in the shape of a solid cylinder 100 miles in diameter. It would be (for just a brief moment) like a wire stretched out over a very long distance. It could never maintain such a shape; the object would still have gravity, and the ends would quickly and catastrophically collapse toward the center. This would be quite a thing to witness. By the time all the crashing and exploding comes to an end, the mass would be roughly spherical. This is just to visually illustrate the idea of gravity pulling the mass into a spherical shape; in fact some of the impacts may be so great that some of the material might be propelled at such a velocity that it would never return.