Western Philosophy
20th century philosophy |
|
Name
|
Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell
|
|
Birth
|
May 18 1872(1872--)
Trellech, Monmouthshire, Wales
|
|
Death
|
February 2 1970 (aged 97)
Penrhyndeudraeth, Wales
|
|
School/tradition
|
Analytic philosophy
Nobel Prize in Literature (1950)
|
|
Main interests
|
Ethics, epistemology, logic, mathematics, philosophy of
language, philosophy of science, religion
|
|
Notable ideas
|
Logical atomism, knowledge by
acquaintance and knowledge by description, Russell's paradox, Russell's teapot.
|
|
Influences
|
Leibniz, Hume, G.E. Moore, John McTaggart, Frege, Whitehead, Wittgenstein, Mill
|
|
Influenced
|
Wittgenstein, A. J. Ayer, Rudolf Carnap, Kurt Gödel, Karl
Popper, W. V. Quine, N. Chomsky
|
Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell, OM, FRS, (18 May 1872 –
2 February 1970), was a British philosopher, historian, logician, mathematician, advocate for social reform,
pacifist, and prominent rationalist.
A prolific writer, he was also a populariser of philosophy
and a commentator on a large variety of topics. Continuing a family tradition in political
affairs, he was a prominent anti-war activist, championing
free trade between nations and anti-imperialism.[1][2]
Russell was born at the height of Britain's economic and political ascendancy. He died of influenza
nearly a century later, at a time when the British Empire had all but vanished, its power
dissipated by two world wars and the end of the imperial system. As one of the world's
best-known intellectuals, Russell's voice carried great moral authority, even into his death.[3] Among his political activities, Russell was a vigorous proponent of
nuclear disarmament and an outspoken critic of the
Vietnam War.
In 1950, Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, "in recognition of his varied and significant writings in which he champions
humanitarian ideals and freedom of
thought".[4]
Biography
Bertrand Russell was born on 18 May 1872 at Trellech, Monmouthshire, (now Gwent) into
an aristocratic family.[4]
Ancestry
His paternal grandfather, John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, was the
second son of John Russell, 6th Duke of Bedford, and had twice been
asked to form a government by Queen Victoria, serving her as Prime Minister in the 1840s and 1860s.
The Russells had been prominent for several centuries in Britain before this, coming to power and the peerage with the rise of
the Tudor dynasty. They established themselves as one of Britain's leading Whig (Liberal) families, and participated in every great political event from the Dissolution of the Monasteries in 1536-40 to the Glorious Revolution in 1688-9 to the Great Reform Act in
1832.
Russell's mother Catherine (née Stanley) was also from an aristocratic family, and was the sister of Rosalind Howard, Countess of Carlisle.
Russell's parents were quite radical for their times—Russell's father, Viscount Amberley, was an atheist and consented to his
wife's affair with their children's tutor, the biologist Douglas Spalding. Both were
early advocates of birth control at a time when this was considered scandalous.
John Stuart Mill, the Utilitarian
philosopher, stood as Russell's godfather. Mill died the following year, but his writings had
a great impact upon Russell's life.
Childhood and adolescence
Russell had two siblings: Frank (nearly seven years older than
Bertrand), and Rachel (four years older). In June 1874 Russell's mother died of diphtheria,
followed shortly by Rachel, and in January 1876 his father also died of bronchitis following
a long period of depression. Frank and Bertrand were placed in the care of their
staunchly Victorian grandparents, who lived at Pembroke Lodge in Richmond Park. John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, his grandfather, died in 1878, and was remembered by
Russell as a kindly old man in a wheelchair. As a result, his widow, the Countess Russell (née Lady Frances Elliot), was the
dominant family figure for the rest of Russell's childhood and youth.
The countess was from a Scottish Presbyterian
family, and successfully petitioned a British court to set aside a provision in Amberley's
will requiring the children to be raised as agnostics. Despite her religious conservatism,
she held progressive views in other areas (accepting Darwinism and supporting Irish Home Rule), and her influence on Bertrand Russell's outlook on social justice and standing up for principle remained with him throughout his life - her favourite Bible
verse, 'Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil.' (Exodus 23:2), became his mantra. However, the atmosphere at Pembroke
Lodge was one of frequent prayer, emotional repression and formality; Frank reacted to this with open rebellion, but the young
Bertrand learned to hide his feelings.
Russell's adolescence was thus very lonely, and he often contemplated suicide. He remarked in his autobiography that his keenest interests were in sex, religion and mathematics, and
that only the wish to know more mathematics kept him from suicide [5]. He was educated at home by a series of tutors,[4] and he spent countless hours in his grandfather's library.
His brother Frank introduced him to the work of Euclid, which transformed Russell's
life.[citation needed]
University and first marriage
Russell won a scholarship to read for the Mathematics Tripos at
Trinity College, Cambridge, and commenced his studies there in 1890. He
became acquainted with the younger G.E. Moore and came under the influence of
Alfred North Whitehead, who recommended him to the Cambridge Apostles. He quickly distinguished himself in mathematics and philosophy, graduating with a
B.A. in the former subject in 1893 and adding a fellowship in the latter in 1895.
Russell first met the American Quaker Alys Pearsall Smith when he was seventeen years old. He became a friend of the Pearsall Smith family
— they knew him primarily as 'Lord John's grandson' and enjoyed showing him off — and travelled with them to the continent; it
was in their company that Bertrand visited the Paris Exhibition of 1889
and was able to climb the Eiffel Tower soon after it was completed.
He soon fell in love with the puritanical, high-minded Alys, who was a graduate of Bryn
Mawr College near Philadelphia, and, contrary to his grandmother's
wishes, he married her in December 1894. Their marriage began to fall apart in 1902 when it
occurred to Russell, while he was out on his bicycle, that he no longer loved her; they divorced nineteen years later, after a
lengthy period of separation. During this period, Russell had passionate (and often simultaneous) affairs with a number of women,
including Lady Ottoline Morrell and the actress Lady Constance Malleson.
Alys pined for him for these years and continued to love Russell for the rest of her life.
Early career
Russell began his published work in 1896 with German Social Democracy, a study in politics that was an early indication of a lifelong interest in
political and social theory. In 1896, he taught German social democracy at the London School of Economics, where he also lectured on the science of power in the autumn of
1937. He was also a member of the Coefficients dining club of social
reformers set up in 1902 by the Fabian campaigners Sidney and Beatrice Webb.
Russell became a fellow of the Royal Society in 1908. The first of three volumes of
Principia Mathematica (written with Whitehead) was published in 1910, which
(along with the earlier The Principles of Mathematics) soon made Russell world famous in his field. In 1911, he became
acquainted with the Austrian engineering student Ludwig Wittgenstein, whom he viewed
as a genius and a successor who would continue his work on logic. He spent hours dealing with Wittgenstein's various phobias and
his frequent bouts of despair. The latter was often a drain on Russell's energy, but he continued to be fascinated by him and
encouraged his academic development, including the publication of Wittgenstein's
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus in 1922.
First World War
During the First World War, Russell engaged in pacifist activities, and, in 1916, he was dismissed from Trinity College following his conviction under the Defence of the Realm Act. A later conviction resulted in six months' imprisonment in
Brixton prison (see Activism)
Between the wars, and second marriage
In 1920, Russell travelled to Russia as part of an official delegation sent by the British
government to investigate the effects of the Russian Revolution. During the
course of his visit, he met Lenin and had an hour-long conversation with him. (In his
autobiography, he mentions that he found Lenin rather disappointing, and that he sensed an "impish cruelty" in him.) He also
cruised down the Volga on a steam-ship. Russell's lover Dora Black also visited Russia
independently at the same time - she was enthusiastic about the revolution, but Russell's experiences destroyed his previous
tentative support for it.
Russell subsequently lectured in Beijing on philosophy for one year, accompanied by Dora.
While in China, Russell became gravely ill with pneumonia, and incorrect reports of his death were published in the Japanese press. When the couple
visited Japan on their return journey, Dora notified the world that "Mr Bertrand Russell, having
died according to the Japanese press, is unable to give interviews to Japanese journalists".
On the couple's return to England in 1921, Dora was five months pregnant, and Russell arranged a hasty divorce from Alys,
marrying Dora six days after the divorce was finalised. Their children were John
Conrad Russell, 4th Earl Russell and Katharine Jane Russell (now Lady
Katharine Tait). Russell supported himself during this time by writing popular books explaining matters of physics, ethics and education to the
layman.
Together with Dora, he also founded the experimental Beacon Hill School
in 1927. After he left the school in 1932, Dora continued it until 1943.
Upon the death of his elder brother Frank, in 1931, Russell became the 3rd Earl Russell. He once said that his
title was primarily useful for securing hotel rooms.
Russell's marriage to Dora grew increasingly tenuous, and it reached a breaking point over her having two children with an
American journalist, Griffin Barry. In 1936, he took as
his third wife an Oxford undergraduate named Patricia ("Peter") Spence, who had
been his children's governess since the summer of 1930. Russell and Peter had one son,
Conrad Sebastian Robert Russell, later to become a prominent historian,
and one of the leading figures in the Liberal Democrat party.
Second World War
After the Second World War, Russell taught at the University of Chicago, later
moving on to Los Angeles to lecture at the University of California, Los Angeles. He was appointed professor at the
City College of New York in 1940, but after a public outcry, the appointment
was annulled by a court judgement: his opinions (especially those relating to sexual
morality, detailed in Marriage and Morals ten years earlier) made him "morally unfit" to teach at the college. The
protest was started by the mother of a student who (as a woman) would not have been eligible for his graduate-level course in
mathematical logic. Many intellectuals, led by John Dewey, protested his treatment. Dewey and
Horace M. Kallen edited a collection of articles on the CCNY affair in The Bertrand Russell Case. He soon joined the Barnes Foundation, lecturing to a varied audience on the history of philosophy - these
lectures formed the basis of A History of Western
Philosophy. His relationship with the eccentric Albert C. Barnes soon
soured, and he returned to Britain in 1944 to rejoin the faculty of Trinity College.
During his return to Britain, by steamship, the Captain of the vessel he was sailing on asked Russell if he had read The
ABCs of Relativity, which he thought an excellent work. Russell then had the pleasure of telling the Captain who had written
it.
Later life
During the 1940s and 1950s, Russell participated in many broadcasts over the BBC on various
topical and philosophical subjects. By this time in his life, Russell was world famous outside of academic circles, frequently
the subject or author of magazine and newspaper articles,
and was called upon to offer up opinions on a wide variety of subjects, even mundane ones. En route to one of his lectures in
Trondheim, Russell survived a plane crash in
Hommelvik October 1948 (24 survivors, 43 on board). A History of
Western Philosophy (1945) became a best-seller, and provided Russell with a steady income for the remainder of his
life. In 1949, Russell was awarded the Order of Merit, and the following year he was
awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature.
In 1952, Russell was divorced by Peter, with whom he had been very unhappy. Conrad, Russell's son by Peter, did not see his
father between the time of the divorce and 1968 (at which time his decision to meet his father caused a permanent breach with his
mother). Russell married his fourth wife, Edith Finch, soon after the divorce, in
December 1952. They had known each other since 1926, and Edith had taught English at
Bryn Mawr College near Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, sharing a house for twenty years with Russell's old friend Lucy Donnelly. Edith remained with him until his
death, and, by all accounts, their relationship was close and loving throughout their marriage. Russell's eldest son, John,
suffered from serious mental illness, which was the source of ongoing disputes between
Russell and John's mother, Russell's former wife, Dora. John's wife Susan was also mentally ill, and eventually Russell and Edith
became the legal guardians of their three daughters (two of whom were later diagnosed with schizophrenia).
Political causes
Russell spent the 1950s and 1960s engaged in various political causes, primarily related to nuclear disarmament and opposing
the U.S. invasion of Vietnam (see also Russell Vietnam
War Crimes Tribunal - 1967). He wrote a great many letters to world leaders during this period. He also became a hero to
many of the youthful members of the New Left. During the 1960s, in particular, Russell became
increasingly vocal about his disapproval of what he felt to be the American government's near-genocidal policies. In 1963 he
became the inaugural recipient of the Jerusalem Prize, an award for writers concerned
with the freedom of the individual in society.
Final years and death
Bertrand Russell published his three-volume autobiography in 1967, '68 and '69. Although he became frail, he remained lucid
until the end.
On 31 January 1970 he condemned "Israeli aggression in the Middle East", saying that "We are frequently told
that we must sympathise with Israel because of the suffering of the Jews in Europe at the hands of the Nazis. ... What Israel is
doing today cannot be condoned, and to invoke the horrors of the past to justify those of the present is gross hypocrisy". This
was read out at the International Conference of Parliamentarians in Cairo on 3 February 1970, along with a notice that Russell had died the previous
day.
Bertrand Russell died at 6.30 pm on 2 February 1970 at his
home, Plas Penrhyn, in Penrhyndeudraeth,
Merionethshire, Wales of influenza. He had previously fought that illness off in late December 1969.
His ashes, as his will directed, were scattered after his cremation three days later.
Philosophical work
Analytic philosophy
Cover of the book,
The Quotable Bertrand Russell
Russell is generally recognised as one of the founders of analytic philosophy,
even of its several branches. At the beginning of the 20th century, alongside G. E.
Moore, Russell was largely responsible for the British "revolt against Idealism", a
philosophy greatly influenced by G. W. F. Hegel and his British apostle,
F. H. Bradley. This revolt was echoed 30 years later in Vienna by the logical positivists' "revolt against
metaphysics". Russell was particularly critical of a doctrine he ascribed to
idealism and coherentism, which he dubbed the
doctrine of internal relations; this, Russell suggested, held that in
order to know any particular thing, we must know all of its relations. Based on this Russell attempted to show that it would make
space, time,
science and the concept of number not fully intelligible. Russell's logical work with
Whitehead continued this project.
Russell and Moore strove to eliminate what they saw as meaningless and incoherent assertions in philosophy. They sought
clarity and precision in argument by the use of exact language and by breaking down
philosophical propositions into their simplest grammatical components. Russell, in
particular, saw formal logic and science as the principal tools of the philosopher. Indeed,
unlike most philosophers who preceded him and his early contemporaries, Russell did not believe there was a separate method for
philosophy. He believed that the main task of the philosopher was to illuminate the most general propositions about the
world and to eliminate confusion. In particular, he wanted to end what he saw
as the excesses of metaphysics. Russell adopted William of Ockham's principle against
multiplying unnecessary entities, Occam's Razor, as a central part of the method of
analysis.[citation needed]
Logic and philosophy of mathematics
Russell had great influence on modern mathematical logic. The American philosopher
and logician Willard Quine said Russell's work represented the greatest
influence on his own work.
Russell's first mathematical book, An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry, was published in 1897. This work was
heavily influenced by Immanuel Kant. Russell soon realized that the conception it laid out
would have made Albert Einstein's schema of space-time impossible, which he understood to be superior to his own system. Thenceforth, he rejected the
entire Kantian program as it related to mathematics and geometry, and he maintained that his own earliest work on the subject was nearly without value.
Interested in the definition of number, Russell studied
the work of George Boole, Georg Cantor, and
Augustus De Morgan, while materials in the Bertrand Russell Archives at
McMaster University include notes of his reading in algebraic logic by Charles S. Peirce and Ernst Schröder. He became convinced that the foundations of mathematics were to be found in logic, and
following Gottlob Frege took an existentialist
approach in which logic was in turn based upon set theory. In 1900 he attended the first
International Congress of Philosophy in Paris, where he became familiar with the work of the Italian mathematician, Giuseppe Peano. He mastered Peano's new symbolism and his set of axioms
for arithmetic. Peano defined logically all of the terms of these axioms with the exception
of 0, number, successor, and the singular term, the, which were the primitives of his system. Russell
took it upon himself to find logical definitions for each of these. Between 1897 and 1903 he published several articles applying
Peano's notation to the classical Boole-Schröder algebra of relations, among them On the Notion of Order, Sur la
logique des relations avec les applications à la théorie des séries, and On Cardinal Numbers.
Russell eventually discovered that Gottlob Frege had independently arrived at equivalent definitions for 0,
successor, and number, and the definition of number is now usually referred to as the Frege-Russell definition. It
was largely Russell who brought Frege to the attention of the English-speaking world. He did this in 1903, when he published
The
Principles of Mathematics, in which the concept of class is inextricably tied to the definition of number. The appendix
to this work detailed a paradox arising in Frege's application of second- and higher-order functions which took first-order
functions as their arguments, and he offered his first effort to resolve what would henceforth come to be known as the Russell
Paradox. Before writing Principles, Russell became aware of Cantor's proof that there was no greatest cardinal number, which Russell believed was mistaken. The Cantor Paradox in turn was shown (for example
by Crossley) to be a special case of the Russell Paradox. This caused Russell to analyze classes, for it was known that given any number of elements, the number of classes they result in is
greater than their number. This in turn led to the discovery of a very interesting class - namely, the class of all classes. It
contains two kinds of classes: those classes that contain themselves, and those that do not. Consideration of this class led him
to find a fatal flaw in the so-called principle of comprehension, which had been taken for granted by logicians of the time. He
showed that it resulted in a contradiction, whereby Y is a member of Y, if and only if, Y is not a member of Y. This has become
known as Russell's paradox, the solution to which he outlined in an appendix to
Principles, and which he later developed into a complete theory, the Theory of types.
Aside from exposing a major inconsistency in naive set theory, Russell's work led
directly to the creation of modern axiomatic set theory. It also crippled Frege's project of
reducing arithmetic to logic. The Theory of Types and much of Russell's subsequent work have also found practical applications
with computer science and information
technology.
Russell continued to defend logicism, the view that mathematics is in some important sense
reducible to logic, and along with his former teacher, Alfred North Whitehead,
wrote the monumental Principia Mathematica, an axiomatic system on which all of mathematics can be built. The first volume of the Principia was
published in 1910, and is largely ascribed to Russell. More than any other single work, it established the specialty of
mathematical or symbolic logic. Two more volumes were published, but their original plan to incorporate geometry in a fourth
volume was never realized, and Russell never felt up to improving the original works, though he referenced new developments and
problems in his preface to the second edition. Upon completing the Principia, three volumes of extraordinarily
abstract and complex reasoning, Russell was exhausted, and he never felt his intellectual
faculties fully recovered from the effort. Although the Principia did not fall prey to the paradoxes in Frege's approach, it was later proven by Kurt Gödel that
neither Principia Mathematica, nor any other consistent system of primitive recursive arithmetic, could, within that
system, determine that every proposition that could be formulated within that system was decidable, i.e. could decide whether
that proposition or its negation was provable within the system (Gödel's
incompleteness theorem).
Russell's last significant work in mathematics and logic, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, was written by hand
while he was in jail for his anti-war activities during
World War I. This was largely an explication of his previous work and its philosophical
significance.
Philosophy of language
Russell was not the first philosopher to suggest that language had an important bearing on how we understand the world;
however, more than anyone before him, Russell made language, or more specifically, how we use language, a central part of
philosophy. Had there been no Russell, it seems unlikely that philosophers such as Ludwig
Wittgenstein, Gilbert Ryle, J. L. Austin, and
P. F. Strawson, among others, would have embarked upon the same course, for so much of
what they did was to amplify or respond, sometimes critically, to what Russell had said before them, using many of the techniques
that he originally developed. Russell, along with Moore, shared the idea that clarity of expression is a virtue, a notion that
has been a touchstone for philosophers ever since, particularly among those who deal with the philosophy of language.
Perhaps Russell's most significant contribution to philosophy of language is
his theory of descriptions, as presented in his seminal essay,
On Denoting, first published in 1905 in the Mind philosophical journal, which the mathematician and philosopher Frank P. Ramsey described as "a paradigm of philosophy." The theory is normally illustrated using the
phrase "the present King of France", as in "The present king of France is bald." What object is this proposition about, given that
there is not, at present, a king of France? (Roughly the same problem would arise if there were two kings of France at present:
which of them does "the king of France" denote?) Alexius Meinong had suggested
that we must posit a realm of "nonexistent entities" that we can suppose we are referring to when we use expressions such as
this; but this would be a strange theory, to say the least. Frege, employing his distinction between sense and reference, suggested that such sentences, although
meaningful, were neither true nor false. But some such propositions, such as "If the present king of France is
bald, then the present king of France has no hair on his head," seem not only truth-valuable but indeed obviously
true.
The problem is general to what are called "definite descriptions." Normally this
includes all terms beginning with "the", and sometimes includes names, like "Walter Scott." (This point is quite contentious:
Russell sometimes thought that the latter terms shouldn't be called names at all, but only "disguised definite descriptions," but
muc