A chemical substance used to destroy or inhibit the growth of plants, especially weeds.
herbicidal her'bi·cid'al (-sīd'l) adj.Did you mean: herbicide (in chemistry, agriculture), pesticide (material – in biology, chemistry, zoology)
Dictionary:
her·bi·cide (hûr'bĭ-sīd', ûr'-) ![]() |
A chemical substance used to destroy or inhibit the growth of plants, especially weeds.
herbicidal her'bi·cid'al (-sīd'l) adj.| 5min Related Video: herbicides |
| Sci-Tech Encyclopedia: Herbicide |
Any chemical used to destroy or inhibit plant growth, especially of weeds or other undesirable vegetation. There are well over a hundred chemicals in common usage as herbicides. Many of these are available in several formulations or under several trade names. The variety of materials are conveniently classified according to the properties of the active ingredient as either selective or nonselective. Selective herbicides are those that kill some members of a plant population with little or no injury to others. Nonselective herbicides are those that kill all vegetation to which they are applied. Further subclassification is by method of application, such as preemergence (soil-applied before plant emergence) or postemergence (applied to plant foliage). Additional terminology sometimes applied to describe the mobility of post-emergence herbicides in the treated plant is contact (nonmobile) or translocated (mobile—that is, killing plants by systemic action).
A rapidly expanding use for nonselective herbicides is the destruction of vegetation before seeding in the practice of reduced tillage or no tillage. Some are also used to kill annual grasses in preparation for seeding perennial grasses in pastures. Additional uses are in fire prevention, elimination of highway hazards, destruction of plants that are hosts for insects and plant diseases, and killing of poisonous or allergen-bearing plants.
Preemergence or postemergence application methods derive naturally from the properties of the herbicidal chemical. The distinction between pre- and postemergence is not always clear-cut. For example, atrazine can exert its herbicidal action either following root absorption from a preemergence application or after leaf absorption from a postemergence treatment.
| Encyclopedia of Public Health: Herbicides |
Herbicides are a class of pesticides that are marketed specifically for the purpose of killing or inhibiting the growth of weeds. Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, a weed is defined as "a plant that grows where it is not wanted." The benefits of herbicide use have been many. In agriculture, herbicides control weeds that may rob water and nutrients from crop plants. Compared to other methods, like tillage, herbicides have been promoted as methods of weed control that lessen the impact of soil erosion. They have also been used to control aquatic weeds that block water intakes or invade natural ecosystems, as well as in forestry, and even in swimming pools to inhibit growth of algae. These benefits have resulted in a steady demand for pesticides in the United States, where about 550 million to 600 million pounds per year were used between 1979 and 1997.
In the United States in 1997, there were an estimated $6.8 billion in sales of herbicides and plant growth regulators. Herbicides constitute a large percentage of total pesticide use. Worldwide in 1997, there were 5.7 billion pounds of pesticides used, of which 2.2 billion were herbicides. Of the1.2 billion pounds of conventional pesticides used in the United States in 1997, a total of 568 million pounds of herbicides were used—470 million pounds in agriculture, 48 million pounds in industry and government, and 49 million pounds in households. The largest quantities are associated with on crops planted to large acreages, such as soy, cotton, corn, and canola.
There are numerous classes of herbicides (see Table 1) with different modes of action for killing weeds, as well as different potentials to have an adverse effect on health and the environment. Herbicides from different classes also differ in their environmental persistence and fate.
Almost all herbicides can cause acute toxicity. Phenoxy herbicides are involved in acute symptomatic illnesses with relative frequency, accounting
Table 1
| Class of Herbicide | Examples |
| SOURCE: Sine, C. ed. (1998). Farm Chemicals Handbook. | |
| Acetamides and analides | Alachlor, acetochlor, metolochlor, propachlor, propanil |
| Carbamates and thiocarbamates | Asulam, terbucarb, thiobencarb |
| Chlorphenoxy herbicides | 2,4,-D, 2,4-DP, 2,4-DB, 2,4,5-T, MCPA, MCPB, MCPP, Dicamba |
| Dipyridyls | Paraquat, diquat |
| Heavy metals | Lead arsenate, arsenicals |
| Nitrophenolic and dinitrocresolic herbicides | Dinitrophenol, dinitrocresol, dinoseb, dinosulfon |
| Pentachlorophenol | Pentachlorophenol |
| Phosphonates | Glyphosate, glyfusinate, fosamine ammonium |
| Triazines | Atrazine, simazine, cyanazine, propazine |
| Urea derivatives | Diuron, flumeturon, linuron, rimsulfuron, tebuthiuron |
for a reported 453 illnesses in 1996. Glyphosate, a phosphonate herbicide, causes eye, skin, and upper respiratory effects in pesticide workers. Paraquat, a dipyridil pesticide, causes skin irritation and has been frequently associated with accidental death and suicide, especially in developing countries. Access to paraquat is restricted in the United States.
Herbicides are associated with a variety of chronic health risks. Most notable have been concerns about carcinogenicity. Both 2,4,5-T and pentachlorophenol are contaminated by carcinogenic dioxins and furans in manufacture. A number of the acetamide/analide and triazine pesticides are carcinogenic in animals. Studies of U.S. farmers have indicated that general exposure to herbicides is correlated with elevated rates of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and certain other cancers; however, no specific chemicals have been pinpointed definitively. Many have been banned or severely restricted in the United States and elsewhere, including most of the chlorphenoxy herbicides, the dipyridyls, lead arsenate and arsenicals, and the nitrophenol/dinitrophenol herbicides.
(SEE ALSO: Farm Injuries; Pesticides; Toxic Substances Control Act; Toxicology)
Bibliography
Reigart, J. R., and Roberts, J. R. (1999). Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings, 5th edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Sine, C., ed. (1998). Farm Chemicals Handbook. Willoughby, OH: Meister.
Zahm, S. H., and Blair, A. (1992). "Pesticides and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma." Cancer Research 52(19):5485s– 5488s.
— LYNN R. GOLDMAN
| US Military Dictionary: herbicide |
See the Introduction, Abbreviations and Pronunciation for further details.
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: herbicide |
For more information on herbicide, visit Britannica.com.
| Columbia Encyclopedia: herbicide |
Contact herbicides kill only the parts of the plant they touch; systemic herbicides are absorbed by foliage or roots and translocated to other parts of the plant. Preemergence herbicides, mixed into the soil, will kill germinating seeds and small seedlings. Postemergence herbicides either hinder photosynthesis or inhibit growth.
Early chemical herbicides were inorganic compounds. Herbicides such as ashes, common salts, and bittern have been used in agriculture since ancient times. Observation in 1896 that Bordeaux mixture, a fungicide, also provided control of certain weeds, led to the use of copper sulfate as a selective weed killer to control charlock (wild mustard) in cereals. By 1900, solutions of sulfuric acid, iron sulfate, copper nitrate, and ammonium and potassium salts were known to act as selective herbicides; soon thereafter sodium arsenite solutions became the standard herbicides, and they were used in large quantities until about 1960. Other inorganic herbicides include ammonium sulfamate, carbon bisulfide, sodium chlorate, sulfuric acid solutions, and formulations containing borate.
Organic herbicides began to be produced in earnest with dinitrophenol compounds in 1932. A breakthrough occurred in the 1940s with 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), a compound similar to plant hormones, which is a highly selective systemic herbicide when used in very small quantities. 2,4-D was quickly adopted to control broad-leaved weeds in corn, sorghum, small grains, and grass pastures, as well as in lawns and other ornamental turf. The phenoxyaliphatic acids and their derivatives, another major group of organic herbicides, succeeded because of their selectivity and ease of translocation. Other groups of organic herbicides include organic arsenicals, substituted amides and ureas, nitrogen heterocyclic acids, phenol derivatives, triazines, and sulfonylureas.
In the 1960s and 1970s, a combination of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T was widely used in Vietnam as a defoliant under the name Agent Orange. As a result of questions concerning the possible health effects of the use of Agent Orange, heightened awareness of possible ecological and health dangers attributable to herbicides has resulted in reevaluation of many compounds and has called indiscriminate use into question. Use of the dioxin-containing 2,4,5-T was prohibited in the United States in 1984. In 1975, Mexico, at the urging of the United States government, began spraying fields of marijuana with paraquat, which both eliminated the crop and raised fears of toxic side effects in marijuana users.
See also pesticide.
| Food & Culture Encyclopedia: Herbicides |
Weeds have been deemed undesirable during much of human history for their negative influence on crop production, their unsightly appearance in the landscape, and in some cases their toxic properties and negative effects on human and animal health. Consequently, weed control is as old as the discovery of agriculture, eight to ten thousand years ago. Techniques for weed control have progressed from the employment of intensive human labor to complex systems involving mechanical, chemical, and biological methods. The earliest methods to eliminate weeds involved physical removal by grubbing or hoeing, followed by cultivation practices using first draft animals and then tractors. Since 1945, the use of chemical herbicides has become the predominant weed control technique in many parts of the world.
Chemicals have been suggested for weed control since antiquity. Theophrastus (372–287 B.C.E.) mentions killing trees by pouring olive oil over their roots. Cato (234–149 B.C.E.) advocated the use of amurca (the watery residue left after the oil is drained from crushed olives) for weed control. Other chemicals include sodium chloride, sulfuric acid, sodium arsenite, copper sulfate, iron sulfate, carbon bisulfate, arsenic trichloride, and petroleum oils. The first synthetic herbicide, 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (dinitro) was developed in France in 1932 for selective weed control in beans. In 1940 ammonium sulfamate was introduced for control of woody plants.
The chemical herbicide age began in 1941 when R. Pokorny first synthesized 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) and reported that it had growth-regulating effects on plants. E. J. Krause of the University of Chicago later suggested that 2,4-D might be used to kill weeds, which stimulated research to test this and other newly synthesized chemicals for weed control in the field. These herbicides proved effective, and in 1945 the American Chemical Paint Company was awarded a patent for 2,4-D as a weed killer. The great potential of synthetic herbicides to control weeds and reduce human labor stimulated the birth of the herbicide chemical industry, resulting in the development of over 180 herbicides for weed control by the end of the twentieth century.
Herbicides are now primarily developed in the private sector. Chemists typically synthesize a variety of compounds, which are screened for their ability to control weeds and then modified and formulated for efficient use. Present herbicides tend to have very low mammalian toxicity because they inhibit biochemical pathways that are unique to plants.
There are a number of chemical classes of herbicides and various mechanisms by which herbicides kill plants. Herbicides generally act by inhibiting specific cellular functions, including photosynthesis, plant-specific amino acid biosynthesis, pigment formation, shoot and root growth, cell membranes, cellulose biosynthesis, lipid biosynthesis, and growth hormone activity.
Herbicides may be applied in many ways. Some herbicides are applied to the soil and absorbed by the plant root and/or shoot and move to their site of inhibition within the plant. Others are primarily applied to emerged foliage and either have an immediate contact effect on the foliage by burning or desiccation, or are translocated throughout the plant, leading to total plant death (systemics). Most soil-applied herbicides kill weed seedlings as they emerge from the soil, while foliage-applied herbicides control emerged weeds and can kill quite large plants.
Herbicide selectivity, the ability to kill weeds but not crops, can be accomplished either by directed application or through biochemical mechanisms. Placement of the herbicide to avoid contact with the crop is widely used. For example, tree crops with deep roots often do not absorb soil-applied herbicides. While it is an effective herbicide for killing most broadleaf plants (dicots), 2,4-D is ineffective on most grassy weeds (monocots). This makes it useful in monocot crops, such as grains and turf. Others selectively kill monocot grasses but not dicots, making them effective in crops such as soybean. Some crops metabolize an applied herbicide to an inactive form while the weeds cannot, so the weed is killed, but the crop is not harmed. For example, atrazine is metabolized to an inactive form by maize while weeds are killed.
In many weed and crop situations there are no good selectivity mechanisms for herbicides. With the advent of recombinant DNA technology (genetic engineering) certain crop plants, such as soybean, corn, and cotton, have been made resistant to nonselective herbicides such as glyphosate by adding genes that make the crop immune to the herbicide. This technology is expected to increase, though its rate of acceptance has been slowed by the reluctance of the food industry to utilize transgenic crops because of concerns expressed by certain consumer advocacy groups.
Modern agriculture in the United States is almost inconceivable without the use of herbicides. Herbicides reduce labor inputs for weed control and make it possible to control weeds where cultivation is infeasible. They reduce the need for mechanical cultivation that can injure crop plants and lead to soil degradation via structure loss and compaction. Herbicides allow the use of no-till crop production, which reduces the need for plowing, now considered a destructive practice. Efficient weed control improves crop growth by reducing weed competition for nutrients and water, and results in improved harvesting and crop quality.
A Source of Controversy
Despite the obvious advantages of herbicides, their use has raised concerns relating to human health and the environment. Since herbicides are toxic to plants, critics have questioned their toxicity to other organisms exposed directly or indirectly. The persistence of some herbicides in the environment has led to concerns relating to their carryover in the soil and effects on subsequent crops as well as their influences, due to drift or volatilization, on non-target plants. Furthermore, through repeated exposure to herbicides, many weeds have become resistant, which reduces the efficacy of previously effective herbicides.
Other concerns involve herbicide costs, the requirement for additional equipment for precision application, and questions relating to proper disposal of unused herbicides.
The advantages and disadvantages of herbicide use are thoroughly evaluated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prior to registration and labeling of any new compound. All new pesticides must be granted a registration, permitting their distribution, sale, and use. The EPA assesses a wide variety of potential human health and environmental effects associated with use of the product, including the particular site or crop on which it is to be used; the amount, frequency and timing of its use; and recommended storage and container disposal practices.
In evaluating a pesticide registration application, the registrant must provide data from tests done according to specific EPA guidelines conducted under recognized "Good Laboratory Practice." Results of these tests determine whether a pesticide has the potential to cause adverse effects on humans, wildlife, fish, or plants, including endangered species and non-target organisms, as well as possible contamination of surface water or groundwater from leaching, runoff, and spray drift. The potential human risks evaluated include short-term toxicity and long-term effects, such as cancer and reproductive system disorders. A pesticide will only be registered if it is determined that it can be used to perform its intended function without unreasonably adverse effects on applicators, consumers, or the environment. The EPA also must approve the specific language that appears on each pesticide label; the product can only be legally used according to label directions. The EPA continually evaluates herbicides as to their safety, and any compound that is found to cause any adverse effect is immediately removed from the market.
At the present time herbicides provide consistent, broad-spectrum, and effective weed management in an economical manner. In the future, herbicides will be required to pass even more stringent tests related to their safety. While new-generation herbicides will likely be applied at even lower doses with less environmental persistence and exceedingly low toxicity to non-target organisms, herbicides are now recognized as only one factor in efficient weed control. Weed management is an everevolving system that will continue to use an integrated approach, combining cultural, mechanical, chemical, and biological techniques. In this process, however, herbicides will remain an essential component for weed control to help insure a sustainable food production system that reduces unacceptable risks to the environment while producing an abundant and safe food supply.
Bibliography
Monaco, Thomas J., Stephen C. Weller, and Floyd M. Ashton. Weed Science: Principles and Practices. 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 2002.
Zimdahl, Robert L. Fundamentals of Weed Science. 2d ed. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press, 1999.
—Stephen C. Weller
| Veterinary Dictionary: herbicide |
A substance that destroys weeds. A large number of chemical compounds are used as general and selective herbicides. Most of them have very low toxicity because their availability to animals on recently sprayed pasture is an obvious toxic hazard. Most poisoning incidents arise when animals have accidental access to large volumes of the agent, e.g. if there has been a spillage. The well-known herbicide groupings are bipyridyls, chlorinated acids, dinitro compounds, phenoxyacid derivatives, thiocarbamates and triazines.
| Gardener's Dictionary: herbicide |
A chemical used to kill plants. Selective herbicides kill only particular kinds of plants. Nonselective herbicides kill or damage a wide range of plants.
| Wikipedia: Herbicide |
A herbicide is substance used to kill unwanted plants. Selective herbicides kill specific targets while leaving the desired crop relatively unharmed. Some of these act by interfering with the growth of the weed and are often synthetic "imitations" of plant hormones. Herbicides used to clear waste ground, industrial sites, railways and railway embankments are non-selective and kill all plant material with which they come into contact. Smaller quantities are used in forestry, pasture systems, and management of areas set aside as wildlife habitat.
Some plants produce natural herbicides, such as the genus Juglans (walnuts), or the tree of heaven; the study of such natural herbicides, and other related chemical interactions, is called allelopathy.
Herbicides are widely used in agriculture and in landscape turf management. In the U.S., they account for about 70% of all agricultural pesticide use.[1]
Contents |
| This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2007) |
Prior to the widespread use of chemical herbicides, cultural controls, such as altering soil pH, salinity, or fertility levels, were used to control weeds. Mechanical control (including tillage) was also (and still is) used to control weeds.
The first widely used herbicide was 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, often abbreviated 2,4-D. It was first commercialized by the Sherwin-Williams Paint company and saw use in the late 1940s. It is easy and inexpensive to manufacture, and kills many broadleaf plants while leaving grasses largely unaffected (although high doses of 2,4-D at crucial growth periods can harm grass crops such as maize or cereals). The low cost of 2,4-D has led to continued usage today and it remains one of the most commonly used herbicides in the world. Like other acid herbicides, current formulations utilize either an amine salt (usually trimethylamine) or one of many esters of the parent compound. These are easier to handle than the acid.
2,4-D exhibits relatively good selectivity, meaning, in this case, that it controls a wide number of broadleaf weeds while causing little to no injury to grass crops at normal use rates. A herbicide is termed selective if it affects only certain types of plants, and nonselective if it inhibits a very broad range of plant types. Other herbicides have been more recently developed that achieve higher levels of selectivity than 2,4-D.
The 1950s saw the introduction of the triazine family of herbicides, which includes atrazine, which have current distinction of being the herbicide family of greatest concern regarding groundwater contamination. Atrazine does not break down readily (within a few weeks) after being applied to soils of above neutral pH. Under alkaline soil conditions atrazine may be carried into the soil profile as far as the water table by soil water following rainfall causing the aforementioned contamination. Atrazine is said to have carryover, a generally undesirable property for herbicides.
Glyphosate, frequently sold under the brand name Roundup, was introduced in 1974 for non-selective weed control. It is now a major herbicide in selective weed control in growing crop plants due to the development of crop plants that are resistant to it. The pairing of the herbicide with the resistant seed contributed to the consolidation of the seed and chemistry industry in the late 1990s.
Many modern chemical herbicides for agriculture are specifically formulated to decompose within a short period after application. This is desirable as it allows crops which may be affected by the herbicide to be grown on the land in future seasons. However, herbicides with low residual activity (i.e., that decompose quickly) often do not provide season-long weed control.
Herbicides have widely variable toxicity. In addition to acute toxicity from high exposures there is concern of possible carcinogenicity[2] as well as other long-term problems such as contributing to Parkinson's Disease.
Some herbicides cause a range of health effects ranging from skin rashes to death[citation needed]. The pathway of attack can arise from intentional or unintentional direct consumption, improper application resulting in the herbicide coming into direct contact with people or wildlife, inhalation of aerial sprays, or food consumption prior to the labeled pre-harvest interval. Under extreme conditions herbicides can also be transported via surface runoff to contaminate distant water sources. Most herbicides decompose rapidly in soils via soil microbial decomposition, hydrolysis, or photolysis. Some herbicides are more persistent with longer soil half-lives[citation needed]. Other alleged health effects include chest pain, headaches, nausea, and fatigue.
Phenoxy herbicides are often contaminated with dioxins such as TCDD; research suggested that such contamination results in a small rise in cancer risk after exposure to these herbicides.[3] Triazine exposure has been implicated in a likely relationship to increased risk of breast cancer, although a causal relationship remains unclear.[4]
Herbicide manufacturers have made bold and false or misleading claims about the safety of their products. Chemical manufacturer Monsanto agreed to change its advertising after pressure from New York attorney general Dennis Vacco; Vacco complained about misleading claims that its spray-on glyphosate based herbicides, including Roundup, were safer than table salt and "practically non-toxic" to mammals, birds, and fish.[5] Roundup is toxic and has resulted in death after being ingested in quantities ranging from 85-200 ml, although it has also been ingested in quantities as large as 500ml with only mild or moderate symptoms.[6] The manfucturer of Tordon 101 (Dow AgroSciences, owned by the Dow Chemical Company) has claimed that Tordon 101 has no effects on animals and insects[7], in spite of evidence of strong carcinogenic activity of the active ingredient[8] Picloram in studies on rats.[9]
The risk of Parkinson's Disease has been shown to increase with occupational exposure to herbicides and pesticides.[10] The herbicide paraquat is suspected to be one environmental factor causing Parkinson's disease.[11]
All organic and non-organic herbicides must be extensively tested prior to approval for commercial sale and labeling by the Environmental Protection Agency. However, because of the large number of herbicides in use, there is significant concern regarding health effects. Some of the herbicides in use are known to be mutagenic, carcinogenic or teratogenic[citation needed].
In addition to health effects caused by herbicides themselves, commercial herbicide mixtures often contain other chemicals, including inactive ingredients, which have negative impacts on human health. For example, Roundup contains adjuvants which, even in low concentrations, were found to kill human embryonic, placental, and umbilical cells in vitro.[12]. One study also found that roundup caused genetic damage, but found that the damage was not caused by the active ingredient.[13]
Some herbicides may have therapeutic uses. There is current research into the use of herbicides as an anti-malaria drug that targets the plant-like apicoplast plastid in the malaria-causing parasite Plasmodium falciparum.[citation needed]
Herbicide use generally has negative impacts on bird populations, although the impacts are highly variable and often require field studies to predict accurately. Laboratory studies have at times overestimated negative impacts on birds due to toxicity, predicting serious problems that were not observed in the field.[14] Most observed effects are due not to toxicity but to habitat changes and the decrease in abundance of species birds rely on for food or shelter. Herbicide use in silviculture, used to favor certain types of growth following clearcutting, can cause significant drops in bird populations. Even when herbicides are used which have low toxicity to birds, the herbicides decrease the abundance of many types of vegetation which the birds rely on.[15] Herbicide use in agriculture in Britain has been linked to a decline in seed-eating bird species which rely on the weeds killed by the herbicides.[16] Heavy use of herbicides in neotropical agricultural areas has been one of many factors implicated in limiting the usefulness of such agricultural land for wintering migratory birds.[17]
The health and environmental effects of many herbicides is unknown, and even within the scientific community there is often disagreement on the risk. For example, a 1995 panel of 13 scientists reviewing studies on the carcinogenicity of 2,4-D had divided opinions on the likelihood that 2,4-D causes cancer in humans.[18] As of 1992 there were too few studies on phenoxy herbicides to accurately assess the risk of many types of cancer from these herbicides, even though evidence was stronger that exposure to these herbicides is associated with increased risk of soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.[2]
Scientists generally agree that selection pressure applied to weed populations for a long enough period of time eventually leads to resistance. Plants have developed resistance to Atrazine and to ALS-inhibitors, and more recently, to glyphosate herbicides. Marestail is one weed that has developed glyphosate resistance.[19]
Herbicides can be grouped by activity, use, chemical family, mode of action, or type of vegetation controlled.
By activity:
By use:
Their classification by mechanism of action (MOA) indicates the first enzyme, protein, or biochemical step affected in the plant following application. The main mechanisms of action are:
Almost all herbicides in use today are considered "organic" herbicides in that they contain carbon as a primary molecular component. A notable exception would be the arsenical class of herbicides. Sometimes they are referred to as synthetic organic herbicides. Recently the term "organic" has come to imply products used in organic farming. Under this definition an organic herbicide is one that can be used in a farming enterprise that has been classified as organic. Organic herbicides are expensive and may not be affordable for commercial production.[citation needed] They are much less effective than synthetic herbicides and are generally used along with cultural and mechanical weed control practices.[citation needed]
Organic herbicides include:
Most herbicides are applied as water-based sprays using ground equipment. Ground equipment varies in design, but large areas can be sprayed using self-propelled sprayers equipped with a long boom, of 60 to 80 feet (20 to 25 m) with flat fan nozzles spaced about every 20 in (500 mm). Towed, handheld, and even horse-drawn sprayers are also used.
Synthetic organic herbicides can generally be applied aerially using helicopters or airplanes, and can be applied through irrigation systems (chemigation).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Translations: Herbicide |
Dansk (Danish)
n. - ukrudtsmiddel
Nederlands (Dutch)
onkruidverdelgings- middel
Français (French)
n. - herbicide
Deutsch (German)
n. - Unkrautbekämpfungsmittel
Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - ζιζανιοκτόνο
Português (Portuguese)
n. - herbicida (m), ervicida (m)
Español (Spanish)
n. - herbicida
Svenska (Swedish)
n. - ogräsmedel
中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
除草剂
中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 除草劑
العربيه (Arabic)
(الاسم) مادة مبيدة للاعشاب الضارة
עברית (Hebrew)
n. - תכשיר הקוטל עשבים/צמחים
If you are unable to view some languages clearly, click here.
To select your translation preferences click here.
| Agricultural Research | |
| Ecology and Food | |
| Government Agencies |
| What is a herbicide made of? | |
| What herbicide should be used on Floratam? | |
| Will herbicide kill roaches? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Encyclopedia of Public Health. Encyclopedia of Public Health. Copyright © 2002 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | US Military Dictionary. The Oxford Essential Dictionary of the U.S. Military. Copyright © 2001, 2002 by Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/ Read more | |
![]() | Food & Culture Encyclopedia. Encyclopedia of Food and Culture. Copyright © 2003 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Veterinary Dictionary. Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary 3rd Edition. Copyright © 2007 by D.C. Blood, V.P. Studdert and C.C. Gay, Elsevier. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Military Dictionary. US Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Words, 2003. Read more | |
![]() | Gardener's Dictionary. Taylor's Dictionary for Gardeners, by Frances Tenenbaum. Copyright © 1997 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Herbicide". Read more | |
![]() | Translations. Copyright © 2007, WizCom Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved. Read more |