(1849–1936). Russian physiologist. His importance for the study of animal behaviour is mainly due to his work on conditional reflexes; this work provided the basis for much of the subsequent research on
learning. Pavlov also conducted significant research on the physiology of digestion and on neurosis.
1. Brief life 2. Physiology of circulation and digestion 3. Conditional reflexes 4. Experimental neurosis and personality1. Brief life
Pavlov was born in Ryazan, Russia, and attended the religious school and seminary there, where he studied natural science. He did not complete his studies, but entered St Petersburg University in 1870, where he continued to study natural science, and decided to make his career as a physiologist. After graduation in 1875, he went to the Military Medical Academy to pursue his research. He completed his doctorate there in 1883, and then went to Germany (1884–6), where he studied in Leipzig with Carl Ludwig, and in Breslau. In 1890 he was appointed professor in the department of pharmacology in the Military Medical Academy, and in 1895 he moved to the department of physiology. In 1904 he received the Nobel Prize for his work on the physiology of digestion. He remained professor of physiology until 1925, when he resigned in protest against the expulsion of sons of priests from the Academy (he himself was the son of a priest, but would not have been expelled). Initially Pavlov was outspokenly opposed to the Bolsheviks, even though they supported his research. In 1922 he asked Lenin's permission to transfer his research abroad, but was refused: Lenin wanted prestigious scientists. However, during the last few years before his death (in Leningrad) Pavlov increasingly accepted and approved of the Bolsheviks. From 1925 to 1936 he worked mainly in three laboratories: the Institute of Physiology of the Soviet Academy of Sciences (which is now named after him), the Institute of Experimental Medicine, and the biological laboratory at Koltushy (now Pavlovo), near St Petersburg.
2. Physiology of circulation and digestion
Pavlov held that physiologists should study 'the actual course of particular physiological processes in a whole and normal organism'. He also held that the main problems for experimental research were the mutual interactions of organs within the body, and the relation of the organism to its environment. The method of working on the whole, healthy body of an animal contrasted with the mainstream of physiology in the latter half of the 19th century; most investigations then were on isolated organs and prepared specimens.
Pavlov's work on the physiology of circulation (
c.1874–88) was mainly concerned with the mechanisms that regulate blood pressure. His experimental animal for this, and for most subsequent research, was the dog. He was mainly interested in nervous mechanisms. He discovered, for instance, that the vagus nerve controls blood pressure, and that there are four nerves controlling the heartbeat, which can vary the heartbeat's rhythm and intensity (work on the nervous control of the heart had formed his doctorate).
Pavlov's work on the physiology of digestion began in about 1879, and culminated in his book
The Work of the Digestive Glands (1902, a translation of
Lektsii o rabotie glavnych pishchevaritel'nykh zhelez, 1897). He investigated the nervous mechanisms controlling the secretions of the various digestive glands, and how these nervous mechanisms were stimulated by food. He had to expose the structures of interest surgically, and work on them in a healthy animal, so it was crucial to his success that he was also a brilliant surgeon. (Similar experiments had been attempted in the laboratory in Breslau that he visited in the mid-1880s, but had failed because the experimenters lacked Pavlov's surgical skill.) Once he had exposed part of the gut, Pavlov could directly insert food or chemicals, and observe the effects on the activity of the digestive glands. The method of sham feeding was a related development. A slit is made in the animal's throat so that food entering through the mouth falls out through the neck before reaching the stomach. The animal can be fed through a second opening made into the stomach. By sham feeding, Pavlov could observe the effect of food in the mouth on the secretion of digestive juices elsewhere in the gut; he found that the
taste of food in the mouth causes the release of gastric juices in the stomach. A smaller quantity of juice is released if food is put directly into the stomach. Sham feeding has been used and developed extensively by later workers.
Pavlov's own theory for the control of digestive secretions postulated control exclusively by nervous mechanisms. Subsequent research has shown this theory to be incomplete: control by hormones also occurs. He made many other important discoveries while working on digestion. Two of the most important were the enzyme
enterokinase, which controls the activity of another digestive enzyme, and the connection between the properties of the saliva and the type of food being eaten (the Pavlovian curves of salivary secretion). N. P. Shepovalnikov and Pavlov were co-discoverers of enterokinase.
Pavlov's work on the physiology of digestion is important for understanding his work on animal behaviour, for his explanations of animal behaviour are similar to those of the control of digestion. In addition, his methods were similar in all his studies.
3. Conditional reflexes
While at the seminary in Ryazan, Pavlov had read I. M. Sechenov's
Refleksy golovnago mozga (Reflexes of the Brain), which argued that mental events were reflexes. Then, while working on the physiology of digestion, he had noticed 'psychic' salivation: when the dog was confronted by a
stimulus that customarily preceded feeding, it salivated even before being fed. This psychic salivation could be induced, for example, by the animal's food container, or by the presence of the attendant who normally fed the animal, or even by the sound of the attendant's approach. Armed with these incidental observations and with the reflexology of Sechenov, and stimulated by
Charles Darwin's evolutionary arguments about animal behaviour (which encouraged materialistic analyses of mental events), Pavlov set out to investigate the psychic salivation of dogs. This was a simple extension of his earlier studies on the control of digestive secretions, and once again it was the nervous reflex that he looked to for his explanation. He worked on conditional reflexes from about 1902 until his death.
A typical Pavlovian experiment on psychic salivation would be as follows. On several occasions a bell is rung just before the dog is fed, and the dog salivates on receiving its food. Then the bell is rung without presentation of food. It is observed that the dog salivates in response to the bell's ringing. Pavlov termed the food the
unconditional stimulus, the sound of the bell the
conditional stimulus, the salivation to the food the
unconditional reflex, and the salivation to the bell alone the
conditional reflex. ('Conditional' is what Pavlov actually wrote, but the early mistranslation of 'conditioned' is now widespread in the psychological literature.)
Many of the fine details of the conditional reflex were studied by Pavlov and his collaborators. First, there is the temporal sequence of stimuli. Pavlov found that it is much easier to form a conditional reflex if the unconditional stimulus (food) follows the conditional one (bell) than if they are simultaneous, or if the conditional stimulus follows the unconditional. Second, there is the time delay between stimuli. Here he found that a discrete conditional stimulus is more effective in forming a conditional reflex if it occurs near in time to the food than if it occurs a long time before. However, if the conditional stimulus starts a long time before, but continues right up to when the unconditional stimulus is presented, then it is as effective as a conditional stimulus which starts just before the food is given. Third, there is the intensity of the stimuli. A dog salivates more if it is trained on bigger pieces of food, and similarly, it salivates more to a louder bell. Fourth, Pavlov studied generalization of the conditional stimulus. If the animal has been trained on a stimulus of one pitch, it can then be tested for a response to a stimulus of another pitch. This leads to a method of investigating the animal's powers of sensory discrimination, which again was originated and developed by Pavlov.
Pavlov was not only interested in how conditional reflexes were gained; he also studied how they were lost. He classified factors causing loss of a conditional reflex into cases of either
external inhibition or
internal inhibition. If an animal, conditioned in one way, is moved into a new environment, or is exposed to new stimuli before being fed, it loses its original conditional reflex; this is called external inhibition. There are several forms of internal inhibition. The most straightforward is the gradual loss of the conditional reflex if the food is withheld after the conditional stimulus; the conditional reflex requires regular reinforcement (to use Pavlov's term) by the unconditional stimulus.
Pavlov thought of the conditional reflex as similar to any other kind of reflex. The flow of digestive juices is stimulated by the mechanical and chemical properties of food, through the mediation of a nervous (unconditional) reflex. Similarly, salivation could be induced by some environmental indicator of food, again by a nervous (conditional, in this case) reflex. The conditional reflex, however, is easily modifiable by the environment, according to whatever the local indicators of food happen to be. So, Pavlov regarded the formation of conditional reflexes as an adaptation whereby the animal could survive better in a changing environment.
Pavlov also speculated on the fine details of the formation of a conditional reflex. He suggested that the cells of the central nervous system must change structurally and chemically when a conditional reflex is formed: 'the locking in, the formation of new connections, we attribute to the functioning of the separating membrane, should it exist, or simply to the branching between neurones.' This idea has subsequently been confirmed.
Although nearly all his research was on dogs, Pavlov also showed that conditional reflexes can be formed in mice and monkeys, and he was in no doubt that they occur in man, and in all other animals. He wrote: 'A temporary nervous connection is a universal physiological phenomenon in the animal world and exists in us ourselves.' He also showed that more or less any environmental factor can act as a conditional stimulus (though this conclusion has been slightly modified by later research). Pavlov was aiming at truly universal laws of learning, and that is why his discoveries are so fundamental to modern theories of associative learning. One branch of psychology —
behaviourism — went so far as to attribute all human behaviour to
conditioning and reinforcement. Pavlov, however, made no such extravagant claims for the conditional reflex, and ridiculed the claims of behaviourism to scientific status. The most famous expression in English of Pavlov's work on conditioning is his book
Conditioned Reflexes (1927). In psychiatry, conditioning is used in
behaviour therapy.
4. Experimental neurosis and personality
In a famous experiment (1921) by Shenger-Krestovnika a circle was used as a conditional stimulus before feeding, and the dog was also trained to associate an ellipse with not being fed. By small steps the ellipse was then made more and more like a circle. When the ellipse was almost round, initially the dog could usually distinguish it from a circle. But after a few weeks the dog became neurotic: it ceased to be able to recognize obvious ellipses and circles, became very excited, and was no longer calm during experiments. Pavlov termed the animal's abnormal condition experimental
neurosis, and he attributed it to a disturbance of the balance between excitatory and inhibitory processes in the nervous system. This explanation of experimental neurosis is grounded in Pavlov's theory of personality. He explained personality by variation in the excitation of the nervous system. He did not, however, attribute neurosis solely to external factors, such as contradictory stimuli. His experiments on experimental neuroses showed that dogs with different 'personalities' were differentially susceptible to the treatment: the same treatment on different dogs could produce quite different neuroses. In the 1930s Pavlov decided to work on the
genetics of behaviour, and his government built him the biological station at Koltushy for this research.
There is an underlying unity to all Pavlov's work. In his earliest work on blood circulation he established his method (intervention in unanaesthetized, whole dogs) and his paradigm explanation: nervous control. The same procedure was used in his work on the control of digestive secretion, and he started research on conditional reflexes as just another kind of nervous control of digestion. Late in his life, he saw how conditioning could be used to analyse personality and neurosis, and once again he was able to carry over his theoretical framework into a new field.
(Published 1987)— Mark Ridley
Bibliography- Babkin, B. P. (1951). Pavlov: A Biography.
- Gray, J. A. (1979). Pavlov.
- Grigorian, N. A. (1974). Pavlov, Ivan Petrovich.