Renewable energy utilizes natural resources such as sunlight, wind, tides and geothermal
heat, which are naturally replenished. Renewable energy technologies range from solar
power, wind power, and hydroelectricity to
biomass and biofuels for transportation. About 13 percent of
primary energy comes from renewables, with most of this coming from traditional biomass
like wood-burning. Hydropower is the next largest source, providing 2-3%, and modern
technologies like geothermal, wind, solar, and marine energy together produce less than 1% of total world energy demand.[1] The technical potential for their use is very large,
exceeding all other readily available sources.[2]
Renewable energy sources worldwide in 2005 (2004 for items marked * or **). Off-grid electric and ground source heat pumps not
included.
Source: REN21[3]
Renewable energy technologies are sometimes criticised for being unreliable or unsightly, yet the market is growing for many
forms of renewable energy. Wind power has a worldwide installed capacity of 74,223 MW and is widely used in several European
countries and the USA.[4] The manufacturing output
of the photovoltaics industry reached more than 2,000 MW per year in 2006,[5] and PV power
plants are particularly popular in Germany.[6]
Solar thermal power stations operate in the USA and Spain, and the largest of these
is the 354 MW SEGS power plant in the Mojave Desert.[7] The world's largest geothermal power installation is
The Geysers in California, with a rated capacity of 750 MW.[8] Brazil has one of the largest renewable energy programs in the world,
involving production of ethanol fuel from sugar cane, and ethanol now provides 18 percent
of the country's automotive fuel.[9] Ethanol fuel is also
widely available in the USA.
While there are many large-scale renewable energy projects, renewable technologies are also suited to small off-grid applications, sometimes in rural and remote
areas, where energy is often crucial in human development.[10] Kenya has the world's highest household solar ownership rate with roughly 30,000 small (20-100 watt)
solar power systems sold per year.[11]
Climate change concerns coupled with high oil prices and increasing government support are driving increasing renewable
energy legislation, incentives and commercialization. EU leaders
reached agreement in principle in March that 20 percent of the bloc's 20 percent' energy should be produced from renewable fuels
by 2020, as part of its drive to cut emissions of carbon dioxide, blamed in part for global
warming. [12] Investment capital flowing into
renewable energy climbed from $80 billion in 2005 to a record $100 billion in 2006.[13] Some very large corporations such as BP,
GE, Sharp, and Shell are investing in the renewable energy sector.[14][15]
Main renewable energy technologies
The majority of renewable energy technologies are directly or indirectly powered by the sun. The Earth-Atmosphere system is in
equilibrium such that heat radiation into space is equal to incoming solar radiation,
the resulting level of energy within the Earth-Atmosphere system can roughly be described as the Earth's "climate." The
hydrosphere (water) absorbs a major fraction of the incoming radiation. Most radiation is absorbed at low latitudes around the
equator, but this energy is dissipated around the globe in the form of winds and ocean currents. Wave motion may play a role in
the process of transferring mechanical energy between the atmosphere and the ocean through wind stress.[16] Solar energy is also responsible for the distribution of precipitation
which is tapped by hydroelectric projects, and for the growth of plants used to create biofuels.
Renewable energy flows involve natural phenomena such as sunlight,
wind, tides and geothermal
heat, as the International Energy Agency explains:
"Renewable energy is derived from natural processes that are replenished constantly. In its various forms, it derives directly
from the sun, or from heat generated deep within the earth. Included in the definition is electricity and heat generated from
solar, wind, ocean, hydropower, biomass, geothermal resources, and biofuels and hydrogen derived from renewable resources."
[17]
Each of these sources has unique characteristics which influence how and where they are used.
Wind power
-
Airflows can be used to run wind turbines. Modern wind turbines range from around 600kW
to up to 5 MW of rated power, although turbines with rated output of 1.5-3 MW have become the most common for commercial use. The
power output of a turbine is a function of the cube of the wind speed, so as wind speed increases, power output increases
dramatically.[18] Areas where winds are stronger
and more constant, such as offshore and high altitude sites, are preferred locations for wind farms.
Wind power is the fastest growing of the renewable energy technologies,[18] though it currently provides less than 0.5% of global energy.[3][1] Over the past decade, global installed maximum capacity increased from 2,500 MW in 1992 to just
over 40,000 MW at the end of 2003, at an annual growth rate of near 30%.[18] Due to the intermittency of wind resources,
most deployed turbines in the EU produce electricity an average of 25% of the hours in a year (a capacity factor of 25%),[19] but under favourable wind regimes some reach 35% or higher.
Capacity factors are a function of seasonal wind fluctuations and may be higher in winter. It would mean that a typical 5 MW
turbine in the EU would have an average output of 1.7 MW.
Globally, the long-term technical potential of wind energy is believed to be five times total current global energy
production, or 40 times current electricity demand. This could require large amounts of land to be utilized for wind turbines,
particularly in areas of higher wind resources. Offshore resources experience mean wind speeds of ~90% greater than that of land,
so offshore resources could contribute substantially more energy.[20] This number could also increase with higher altitude ground-based or airborne wind
turbines.[21]
Wind strengths near the Earth's surface vary and thus cannot guarantee continuous power unless combined with other energy
sources or storage systems. Some estimates suggest that 1,000 MW of conventional wind generation capacity can be relied on for
just 333 MW of continuous power. While this might change as technology evolves, advocates have suggested incorporating wind power
with other power sources, or the use of energy storage techniques, with this in mind. It is best used in the context of a system
that has significant reserve capacity such as hydro, or reserve load, such as a desalination plant, to mitigate the economic
effects of resource variability.
Wind power is renewable and produces no greenhouse
gases during operation, such as carbon dioxide and methane.
Water power
-
Energy in water (in the form of motive energy or temperature differences) can be harnessed and used. Since water is about 800
times denser than air,[22][23] even a slow flowing
stream of water, or moderate sea swell, can yield considerable amounts of energy.
There are many forms of water energy:
- Hydroelectric energy is a term usually reserved for large-scale hydroelectric
dams.
- Micro hydro systems are hydroelectric power
installations that typically produce up to 100 kW of power. They are often used in water rich areas as a Remote Area Power Supply (RAPS). There are many of these installations around the world,
including several delivering around 50 kW in the Solomon Islands.
- Wave power uses the energy in waves. The waves will usually make large pontoons go up and down in the water, leaving an area with reduced wave height in the "shadow". Wave power has
now reached commercialization.
- Tidal power captures energy from the tides in a vertical direction. Tides come in, raise
water levels in a basin, and tides roll out. Around low tide, the water in the basin is discharged through a turbine.
- Tidal stream power captures energy from the flow of tides, usually using underwater
plant resembling a small wind turbine. Tidal stream power demonstration projects exist, and the first commercial prototype will
be installed in Strangford Lough in September 2007.
- Ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) uses the temperature
difference between the warmer surface of the ocean and the colder lower recesses. To this end, it employs a cyclic heat engine. OTEC has not been field-tested on a large scale.
- Deep lake water cooling, although not technically an energy generation
method, can save a lot of energy in summer. It uses submerged pipes as a heat sink for
climate control systems. Lake-bottom water is a year-round local constant of about 4
°C.
- Blue energy is the reverse of desalination. This
form of energy is in research.
Solar energy use
-
A photovoltaic (PV) module that is composed of multiple PV cells. Two or more interconnected PV modules create an array.
In this context, "solar energy" refers to energy that is collected from sunlight. Solar energy can be applied in many ways,
including to:
Biofuel
-
Plants use photosynthesis to grow and produce biomass. Also known as biomatter, biomass can be used directly as fuel or to produce liquid biofuel. Agriculturally produced biomass fuels, such as biodiesel,
ethanol and bagasse (often a by-product of sugar cane cultivation) can be burned in internal combustion
engines or boilers. Typically biofuel is burned to release its stored chemical energy.
Research into more efficient methods of converting biofuels and other fuels into electricity utilizing fuel cells is an area of
very active work.
Liquid biofuel
Information on pump, California.
Liquid biofuel is usually either a bioalcohol such as ethanol or a bio-oil such as
biodiesel and straight vegetable oil.
Biodiesel can be used in modern diesel vehicles with little or no modification to the engine and can be made from waste and
virgin vegetable and animal oil and fats (lipids). Virgin vegetable oils can be used in modified
diesel engines. In fact the Diesel engine was originally designed to run on vegetable oil rather than fossil fuel. A major
benefit of biodiesel is lower emissions. The use of biodiesel reduces emission of carbon monoxide and other hydrocarbons by 20 to
40%. In some areas corn, cornstalks, sugarbeets, sugar cane, and switchgrasses are grown specifically to produce ethanol (also known as
grain alcohol) a liquid which can be used in internal combustion engines and
fuel cells. Ethanol is being phased into the current energy
infrastructure. E85 is a fuel composed of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline that is sold to consumers. Biobutanol is being developed as an alternative to bioethanol.
In the future, there might be bio-synthetic liquid fuel available. It can be produced by the Fischer-Tropsch process, also called Biomass-To-Liquids (BTL).[24]
Solid biomass
Direct use is usually in the form of combustible solids, either wood, the biogenic portion of municipal solid waste or
combustible field crops. Field crops may be grown specifically for combustion or may be used for other purposes, and the
processed plant waste then used for combustion. Most sorts of biomatter, including dried manure, can actually be burnt to heat
water and to drive turbines.
Sugar cane residue, wheat
chaff, corn cobs and other plant
matter can be, and are, burned quite successfully. The net carbon dioxide emissions that are added to the atmosphere by
this process are only from the fossil fuel that is often currently consumed to plant, fertilize, harvest and transport the
biomass.
Processes to harvest biomass from short-rotation poplars and willows, and perennial grasses such as switchgrass, phalaris, and miscanthus, require less frequent cultivation and less
nitrogen than from typical annual crops. Pelletizing miscanthus and co-firing it with coal
for generating electricity is being studied and may be economically viable.[25] The higher heating value of cellulose is about 17.4 MJ/kg [1]. The estimated yield of ethanol from dry cellulose is about 0.2 kg of ethanol per kg of cellulose [2] (60 gal/ton). Since
the higher heating value of ethanol is 29.7 MJ/kg of ethanol it would be 5.94 MJ/kg of the
cellulose that it is made from. Thus the ethanol contains only about 1/3 as much energy as the cellulose that it was made from.
Co-firing cellulose with coal would replace about three times as much fossil fuel as using the cellulose to make ethanol. The
replaced coal would produce 0.0946 kg CO₂/MJ [3] while the replaced liquid fuel would produce only about 0.0733 kg CO₂/MJ so
co-firing the cellulose with coal is about 3.8 times more effective at reducing CO₂ emissions than using it to make ethanol.
Solid biomass can also be gasified, and used as described in the next section.
Biogas
-
Biogas can easily be produced from current waste streams, such as: paper production, sugar production, sewage, animal waste
and so forth. These various waste streams have to be slurried together and allowed to naturally ferment, producing methane gas.
This can be done by converting current sewage plants into biogas plants. When a biogas plant has extracted all the methane it
can, the remains are sometimes better suitable as fertilizer than the original biomass.
Alternatively biogas can be produced via advanced waste processing systems such as mechanical biological treatment. These systems recover the recyclable elements of
household waste and process the biodegradable fraction in anaerobic digesters.
Renewable natural gas is a biogas which has been upgraded to a quality similar
to natural gas. By upgrading the quality to that of natural gas, it becomes possible to
distribute the gas to the mass market via gas grid.
Geothermal energy
-
Krafla Geothermal Station in northeast Iceland
Geothermal energy is energy obtained by tapping the heat of the earth itself, usually from kilometers deep into the Earth's
crust. It is expensive to build a power station but operating costs are low resulting in low energy costs for suitable sites.
Ultimately, this energy derives from heat in the Earth's core. The government of
Iceland states: "It should be stressed that the geothermal resource is not strictly renewable in
the same sense as the hydro resource." It estimates that Iceland's geothermal energy could provide 1700 MW for over 100 years,
compared to the current production of 140 MW.[26]
The International Energy Agency classifies geothermal power as
renewable.[27]
Three types of power plants are used to generate power from geothermal energy: dry steam, flash, and binary. Dry steam plants
take steam out of fractures in the ground and use it to directly drive a turbine that spins a generator. Flash plants take hot
water, usually at temperatures over 200 °C, out of the ground, and allows it to boil as it rises to the surface then
separates the steam phase in steam/water separators and then runs the steam through a turbine. In binary plants, the hot water
flows through heat exchangers, boiling an organic fluid that spins the turbine. The condensed steam and remaining geothermal
fluid from all three types of plants are injected back into the hot rock to pick up more heat.
The geothermal energy from the core of the Earth is closer to the surface in some areas than in others. Where hot underground
steam or water can be tapped and brought to the surface it may be used to generate electricity. Such geothermal power sources exist in certain geologically unstable parts of the world such as
Iceland, New Zealand, United States, the Philippines and Italy. The two most prominent areas for this in the United States are in the Yellowstone basin and in northern California. Iceland produced 170 MW geothermal power and
heated 86% of all houses in the year 2000 through geothermal energy. Some 8000 MW of capacity is operational in total.
There is also the potential to generate geothermal energy from hot dry
rocks. Holes at least 3 km deep are drilled into the earth. Some of these holes pump water into the earth, while
other holes pump hot water out. The heat resource consists of hot underground radiogenic granite rocks, which heat up when there
is enough sediment between the rock and the earths surface. Several companies in Australia are exploring this technology.
Renewable energy commercialization
-
Costs
Renewable energy systems encompass a broad, diverse array of technologies, and the current status of these can vary
considerably. Some technologies are already mature and economically competitive (e.g. geothermal and hydropower), others need
additional development to become competitive without subsidies. This can be helped by improvements to sub-components, such as
electric generators.
The table shows an overview of costs of various renewable energy technologies. For comparison with the prices in the table,
electricity production from a conventional coal-fired plant costs about 4¢/kWh.[28] Though in some G8 nations the cost can be significantly higher at 7.88p (~15¢/kWh).[29] Achieving further cost reductions as indicated in the table
below requires further technology development, market deployment, and an increase in production capacities to mass production levels.[30]
Wind power market grows
-
- See also: Wind farm
Wind power: worldwide installed capacity and prediction 1997-2010, Source:
WWEA
Figures from the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) show that 2006 recorded
an increase in installed wind power capacity of 15,197 megawatts (MW), taking the total installed capacity to 74,223 MW, up from
59,091 MW in 2005.[4] Despite constraints facing
supply chains for wind turbines, the annual market for wind continued to increase at the rate of 32% following the 2005 record
year, in which the market grew by 41%.[4] In terms
of economic value, the wind energy sector has become one of the important players in the energy markets, with the total value of
new generating equipment installed in 2006 reaching €18 billion, or US$23 billion.[4]
The countries with the highest total installed capacity are Germany (20,621
MW), Spain (11,615 MW), the USA (11,603 MW), India (6,270 MW) and
Denmark (3,136 MW).[4] In terms of new installed capacity in 2006, the USA lead with 2,454 MW, followed by Germany (2,233
MW), India (1,840 MW), Spain (1,587 MW), China (1,347 MW) and France (810 MW).[4]
In the UK, a licence to build the world's largest offshore windfarm, in the Thames estuary, has been granted. The London Array
windfarm, 12 miles off Kent and Essex, should eventually consist of 341 turbines, occupying an area of 90 square miles. This is a
£1.5 billion, 1,000 megawatt project, which will power one-third of London homes. The windfarm will produce an amount of energy
that, if generated by conventional means, would result in 1.9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions every year. It could
also make up to 10% of the Government's 2010 renewables target.[31]
New generation of solar thermal plants
-
The 11 megawatt
PS10 solar power tower in Spain produces electricity from the sun
using 624 large movable mirrors called heliostats.
Construction of the largest solar thermal power plant to be built in 15 years,
in Boulder City, Nevada, is nearly complete. The 64MW Nevada Solar One power plant will
generate enough power to meet the electricity needs of about 40,000 households and follows in the steps of the 354MW
SEGS solar thermal power plants located in California’s Mojave Desert.
While California’s solar plants have generated billions of kilowatt hours of electricity for the past two decades, the Nevada
Solar One plant will use new technologies to capture even more energy from the sun.[32]
The California Solar Initiative
As part of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's Million Solar Roofs Program, California has set a goal to create 3,000 megawatts
of new, solar-produced electricity by 2017 - moving the state toward a cleaner energy future and helping lower the cost of solar
systems for consumers. This is a comprehensive $2.8 billion program.[33]
The California Solar Initiative offers cash incentives on solar PV
systems of up to $2.50 a watt. These incentives, combined with federal tax incentives, can cover up to 50% of the total cost of a
solar panel system.[33] There are many
financial incentives to support the use of renewable energy in other US states.[34]
World's largest photovoltaic power plants
Construction of a 40 MW solar generation power plant is underway in the Saxon region of Germany. The Waldpolenz Solar Park will consist of some 550,000 thin-film solar modules. The
direct current produced in the modules will be converted into alternating current and fed completely into the power grid. Once
completed in 2009, the project will be one of the largest photovoltaic projects ever constructed. Currently the biggest PV plant
in the world has an output capacity of around 12 megawatts.[35]
A large photovoltaic power project has been completed in Portugal, the Serpa solar power plant is at one of the Europe's sunniest areas.[36] The 11 megawatt plant covers 150 acres and is comprised of
52,000 PV panels. The panels are raised 2 metres off the ground and the area will remain productive grazing land. The project
will provide enough energy for 8,000 homes and will save an estimated 30,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions per year.[37][38]
A $420 million large-scale Solar power station in Victoria is to be
the biggest and most efficient solar photovoltaic power station in the world. Australian company Solar Systems will demonstrate
its unique, design incorporating space technology in a 154MW solar power station connected to the national grid. The power
station will have the capability to concentrate the sun by 500 times onto the solar cells for ultra high power output. The
Victorian power station will generate clean electricity directly from the sun to meet the annual needs of over 45,000 homes with
zero greenhouse gas emissions.[39]
However, when it comes to renewable energy systems and PV, it is not just large systems that matter. Building-integrated photovoltaics or "onsite" PV systems have the advantage of being
matched to end use energy needs in terms of scale. So the energy is supplied close to where it is needed.[40]
Use of ethanol for transportation
-
Brazil has one of the largest renewable energy programs in the world, involving production of ethanol fuel from sugar cane,
and ethanol now provides 18 percent of the country's automotive fuel. As a partial result, Brazil, which years ago had to import
a large share of the petroleum needed for domestic consumption, recently reached complete self-sufficiency in oil.[41]
Most cars on the road today in the U.S. can run on blends of up to 10% ethanol, and motor vehicle manufacturers already
produce vehicles designed to run on much higher ethanol blends. Ford,
DaimlerChrysler, and GM are among the automobile
companies that sell “flexible-fuel” cars, trucks, and minivans that can use gasoline and ethanol blends ranging from pure
gasoline up to 85% ethanol (E85). By mid-2006, there were approximately six million E85-compatible vehicles on U.S.
roads.[42] The challenge is to expand
the market for biofuels beyond the farm states where they have been most popular to date. Flex-fuel vehicles are assisting in
this transition because they allow drivers to choose different fuels based on price and availability. The Energy Policy Act of 2005, which calls for 7.5 billion gallons of biofuels to be used
annually by 2012, will also help to expand the market.[42]
Wave farms expand
-
Portugal now has the world's first commercial wave farm,
the Aguçadora Wave Park, established in 2006. The farm will initially use three Pelamis P-750 machines generating 2.25 MW.[43][44] Initial costs are put
at €8.5 million. Subject to successful operation, a further €70 million is likely to be invested
before 2009 on a further 28 machines to generate 525 MW.[45]
Funding for a wave farm in Scotland was announced in February, 2007 by the Scottish Executive, at a cost of over 4 million pounds, as
part of a £13 million funding packages for ocean power in Scotland. The
farm will be the world's largest with a capacity of 3MW generated by four Pelamis machines.[46]
Geothermal energy prospects
By the end of 2005 worldwide use of geothermal energy for electricity had reached
9.3 GWs, with an additional 28 GW used directly for heating.[3] If heat recovered by ground source heat pumps is included, the non-electric use of geothermal energy is
estimated at more than 100 GWt (gigawatts of thermal power) and is used commercially in over 70 countries.([3] sec 1.2) During 2005 contracts were placed
for an additional 0.5 GW of capacity in the United States, while there were also plants under construction in 11 other
countries.[3]
Future potential
While currently renewable energy sources only supply a fraction of current energy use (ca. 14% of primary energy use[47], mostly from traditional biomass), there is much
potential that could be exploited in the future. As the table below illustrates, the technical potential of renewable energy
sources is more than 18 times current global primary energy use and furthermore several
times higher than projected energy use in 2100.
| The Renewable Energy Resource Base (Exajoules a year) |
|
Current use (2001) |
Technical potential |
Theoretical potential |
| Hydropower |
9 |
50 |
147 |
| Biomass energy |
50 |
>276 |
2,900 |
| Solar energy |
0.1 |
>1,575 |
3,900,000 |
| Wind energy |
0.12 |
640 |
6,000 |
| Geothermal energy |
0.6 |
5,000 |
140,000,000 |
| Ocean energy |
not estimated |
not estimated |
7,400 |
| Total |
60 |
>7,600 |
>144,000,000 |
Current use is in primary energy equivalent.
For comparison, the current global primary energy use (2001) is 402 Exajoules a year.
Source: World Energy Assessment 2001[47] |
There are many different ways to assess potentials. The theoretical potential indicates the amount of energy theoretically
available for energy purposes, such as, in the case of solar energy, the amount of incoming
radiation at the earth's surface. The technical potential is a more practical estimate of how much could be put to human use by
considering conversion efficiencies of the available technology and
available land area. To give an idea of the constraints, the estimate for solar energy assumes that 1% of the world's unused land
surface is used for solar power.
The technical potentials generally do not include economic or other environmental constraints, and the potentials that could
be realized at an economically competitive level under current conditions and in a short time-frame is lower still.
Trends favouring Renewables
The renewable market will boom when cost efficiency attains parity with other competing energy sources. The following trends
are a few examples by which the renewables market is being helped to attain critical mass so that it becomes competitive enough
vs fossil fuels:
Other than market forces, renewable industry often needs government sponsorship to help generate enough momentum in the
market. Many countries and states have implemented incentives - like government tax subsidies, partial copayment schemes and
various rebates over purchase of renewables - to encourage consumers to shift to renewable energy sources. [48] Government grants fund for research in renewable technology to make the
production cheaper and generation more efficient. [49]
Development of loan programs that stimulate renewable favoring market forces with attractive return rates, buffer intial
deployment costs and entice consumers to consider and purchase renewable technology. A famous example is the solar loan program sponsored by UNEP helping 100000 people finance solar power systems in
India. [50]
Success in India's solar program has led to similar projects in other parts of
developing world like Tunisia, Morocco, Indonesia and Mexico.
Imposition of high fossil fuel consumption / carbon taxes, and channel the revenue earned
towards renewable energy development. [51]
Many think-tanks are warning that the world needs an urgency driven concerted effort to create a competitive renewable energy
infrastructure and market. The developed world can make more research investments to find better cost efficient technologies, and
manufacturing could be transferred to developing countries in order to use low labor costs. The renewable energy market could
increase fast enough to replace and initiate the decline of fossil fuel dominance and the world could then avert the looming
climate and peak oil crises. [52]
Most importantly, renewables is gaining credence among private investors as having the potential to grow into the next big
industry. Many companies and venture capitalists are investing in photovoltaic development and manufacturing. This trend is
particularly visible in Silicon valley, California, Europe, Japan.
[53] [54] [55]
Constraints and opportunities
Critics suggest that some renewable energy applications may create pollution, be dangerous, take up large amounts of land, or
be incapable of generating a large net amount of energy. Proponents advocate the use of "appropriate renewables", also known as
soft energy technologies, as these have many advantages.
Availability
There is no shortage of solar-derived energy on Earth. Indeed the storages and flows of energy on the planet are very large
relative to human needs.
- The amount of solar energy intercepted by the Earth every minute is greater than the amount of energy the world uses in
fossil fuels each year.
- Tropical oceans absorb 560 trillion gigajoules (GJ) of solar
energy each year, equivalent to 1,600 times the world’s annual energy use.
- The energy in the winds that blow across the United States each year could produce more than 16
billion GJ of electricity—more than one and one-half times the electricity consumed in the
United States in 2000.
- Annual photosynthesis by the vegetation in the United States is 50 billion GJ,
equivalent to nearly 60% of the nation’s annual fossil fuel use.
A criticism of some renewable sources is their intermittent nature. But a
variety of renewable sources in combination can overcome this problem. As Amory Lovins
explains:
- "Stormy weather, bad for direct solar collection, is generally good for windmills and small hydropower plants; dry, sunny
weather, bad for hydropower, is ideal for photovoltaics."[56]
The challenge of variable power supply may be further alleviated by energy storage. Available storage options include
pumped-storage hydro systems, batteries, hydrogen fuel
cells, and thermal mass. Initial investments in such energy storage systems can be high, although the costs can be
recovered over the life of the system.
Wave energy is continuously available, although wave intensity varies by season. A wave energy scheme installed in Australia
generates electricity with an 80% availability factor.
Aesthetics
Both solar and wind generating stations have been criticized from an aesthetic point of view.[57] However, methods and opportunities exist to deploy these renewable technologies
efficiently and unobtrusively: fixed solar collectors can double as noise barriers along highways, and extensive roadway, parking
lot, and roof-top area is currently available; amorphous photovoltaic cells can also be used
to tint windows and produce energy.[58] Advocates of
renewable energy also argue that current infrastructure is less aethetically pleasing than alternatives, but sited further from
the view of most critics.[59]
Environmental and social considerations
While most renewable energy sources do not produce pollution directly, the materials, industrial processes, and construction
equipment used to create them may generate waste and pollution. Some renewable energy systems actually create environmental
problems. For instance, older wind turbines can be hazardous to flying birds.[60]
Land area required
Another environmental issue, particularly with biomass and biofuels, is the large amount of land required to harvest energy,
which otherwise could be used for other purposes or left as undeveloped land. However, it should be pointed out that these fuels
may reduce the need for harvesting non-renewable energy sources, such as vast strip-mined areas and slag mountains for coal,
safety zones around nuclear plants, and hundreds of square miles being strip-mined for oil sands. These responses, however, do
not account for the extremely high biodiversity and endemism of land used for ethanol crops, particularly sugar cane.
In the U.S., crops grown for biofuels are the most land- and water-intensive of the renewable energy sources. In 2005, about
12% of the nation’s corn crop (covering 11 million acres (45,000 km²) of farmland) was used to produce four billion gallons of
ethanol—which equates to about 2% of annual U.S. gasoline consumption. For biofuels to make a much larger contribution to the
energy economy, the industry will have to accelerate the development of new feedstocks, agricultural practices, and technologies
that are more land and water efficient. Already, the efficiency of biofuels production has increased significantly[42] and there are new methods to boost biofuel
production.[61]
Hydroelectric Dams
The major advantage of hydroelectric systems is the elimination of the cost of fuel. Other advantages include longer life than
fuel-fired generation, low operating costs, and the provision of facilities for water sports. Operation of pumped-storage plants
improves the daily load factor of the generation system. Overall, hydroelectric power can be far less expensive than electricity
generated from fossil fuels or nuclear energy, and areas with abundant hydroelectric power attract industry.
However, there are several major disadvantages of hydroelectric systems. These include: dislocation of people living where the
reservoirs are planned, release of significant amounts of carbon dioxide at construction and flooding of the reservoir,
disruption of aquatic ecosystems and birdlife, adverse impacts on the river environment, potential risks of sabotage and
terrorism, and in rare cases catastrophic failure of the dam wall. (See Hydroelectricity article for details.)
Hydroelectric power is now more difficult to site in developed nations because most major sites within these nations are
either already being exploited or may be unavailable for other reasons such as environmental considerations.
Wind farms
Wind power is one of the most environmentally friendly sources of renewable energy
A wind farm, when installed on agricultural land, has one of the lowest environmental impacts of all energy sources:[62]
- It occupies less land area per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity generated than any other energy conversion system, apart
from rooftop solar energy, and is compatible with grazing and crops.
- It generates the energy used in its construction in just 3 months of operation, yet its operational lifetime is 20-25
years.
- Greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution produced by its construction are tiny and declining. There are no emissions or
pollution produced by its operation.
- In substituting for base-load coal power, wind power produces a net decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution,
and a net increase in biodiversity.
- Modern wind turbines are almost silent and rotate so slowly (in terms of revolutions per minute) that they are rarely a
hazard to birds.[62]
Studies of birds and offshore wind farms in Europe have found that there are very few bird collisions.[63] Several offshore wind sites in Europe have been in areas heavily used by
seabirds. Improvements in wind turbine design, including a much slower rate of rotation of the blades and a smooth tower base
instead of perchable lattice towers, have helped reduce bird mortality at wind farms around the world. However older smaller wind
turbines may be hazardous to flying birds.[64] Birds are
severely impacted by fossil fuel energy; examples include birds dying from exposure to oil spills, habitat loss from acid rain
and mountaintop removal coal mining, and mercury poisoning.[65]
Longevity issues
Though a source of renewable energy may last for billions of years, renewable energy infrastructure, like hydroelectric dams,
will not last forever, and must be removed and replaced at some point. Events like the shifting of riverbeds, or changing weather
patterns could potentially alter or even halt the function of hydroelectric dams, lowering the amount of time they are available
to generate electricity.
Although geothermal sites are capable of providing heat for many decades, eventually specific locations may cool down. It is
likely that in these locations, the system was designed too large for the site, since there is only so much energy that can be
stored and replenished in a given volume of earth. Some interpret this as meaning a specific geothermal location can undergo
depletion.
Biofuels production
- See also: Ethanol fuel energy
balance
All biomass needs to go through some of these steps: it needs to be grown, collected, dried, fermented and burned. All of
these steps require resources and an infrastructure.
Some studies contend that ethanol is "energy negative", meaning that it takes more energy to produce than is contained in the
final product.[66] However, a large number of recent
studies, including a 2006 article[67] in the journal
Science offer the opinion that fuels like ethanol are energy positive. Furthermore, fossil fuels also require significant
energy inputs which have seldom been accounted for in the past.
Additionally, ethanol is not the only product created during production, and the energy content of the by-products must also
be considered. Corn is typically 66% starch and the remaining 33% is not fermented. This unfermented component is called
distillers grain, which is high in fats and proteins, and makes good animal feed.[68] In Brazil, where sugar cane is used, the yield is higher, and conversion to ethanol is somewhat
more energy efficient than corn. Recent developments with cellulosic ethanol
production may improve yields even further.[69]
According to the International Energy Agency, new biofuels technologies
being developed today, notably cellulosic ethanol, could allow biofuels to play a much bigger role in the future than previously
thought.[70] Cellulosic ethanol can be made from plant
matter composed primarily of inedible cellulose fibers that form the stems and branches of most plants. Crop residues (such as
corn stalks, wheat straw and rice straw), wood waste, and municipal solid waste are potential sources of cellulosic biomass.
Dedicated energy crops, such as switchgrass, are also promising cellulose sources that can be sustainably produced in many
regions of the United States.[71]
The ethanol and biodiesel production industries also create jobs in plant construction, operations, and maintenance, mostly in
rural communities. According to the Renewable Fuels Association, the ethanol industry created almost 154,000 U.S. jobs in 2005
alone, boosting household income by $5.7 billion. It also contributed about $3.5 billion in tax revenues at the local, state, and
federal levels.[42]
Diversification
The U.S. electric power industry now relies on large, central power stations, including coal, natural gas, nuclear, and
hydropower plants that together generate more than 95% of the nation’s electricity. Over the next few decades uses of renewable
energy could help to diversify the nation’s bulk power supply. Already, appropriate renewable resources (which excludes large
hydropower) produce 12% of northern California’s electricity.[42]
Although most of today’s electricity comes from large, central-station power plants, new technologies offer a range of options
for generating electricity nearer to where it is needed, saving on the cost of transmitting and distributing power and improving
the overall efficiency and reliability of the system.[42]
Improving energy efficiency represents the most immediate and often the most
cost-effective way to reduce oil dependence, improve energy security, and reduce the health and environmental impact of the
energy system. By reducing the total energy requirements of the economy, improved energy efficiency could make increased reliance
on renewable energy sources more practical and affordable.[42]
Other issues
Nuclear power
-
In 1983, physicist Bernard Cohen proposed that uranium is effectively inexhaustible,
and could therefore be considered a renewable source of energy.[72][73] He claims that fast breeder reactors fueled by
seawater-extracted uranium could supply energy at least as long as the sun's expected remaining lifespan of five b