1963 British Grand Prix
Results from the 1963 Formula One British Grand Prix held at Silverstone on July 20, 1963.
Classification
| Pos | No | Driver | Team | Laps | Time/Retired | Grid | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | Jim Clark | Lotus-Climax | 82 | 2:14'09.6 | 1 | 9 |
| 2 | 10 | John Surtees | Ferrari | 82 | + 25.8 | 5 | 6 |
| 3 | 1 | Graham Hill | BRM | 82 | + 37.6 | 3 | 4 |
| 4 | 2 | Richie Ginther | BRM | 81 | + 1 lap | 9 | 3 |
| 5 | 3 | Lorenzo Bandini | BRM | 81 | + 1 lap | 8 | 2 |
| 6 | 12 | Jim Hall | Lotus-BRM | 80 | + 2 laps | 13 | 1 |
| 7 | 19 | Chris Amon | Lola-Climax | 80 | + 2 laps | 14 | |
| 8 | 20 | Mike Hailwood | Lotus-Climax | 78 | + 4 laps | 17 | |
| 9 | 7 | Tony Maggs | Cooper-Climax | 78 | + 4 laps | 7 | |
| 10 | 23 | Carel Godin de Beaufort | Porsche | 76 | + 6 laps | 21 | |
| 11 | 21 | Masten Gregory | Lotus-BRM | 75 | + 7 laps | 22 | |
| 12 | 22 | Bob Anderson | Lola-Climax | 75 | + 7 laps | 16 | |
| 13 | 24 | John Campbell-Jones | Lola-Climax | 74 | + 8 laps | 23 | |
| Ret | 25 | Jo Siffert | Lotus-BRM | 66 | Gearbox | 15 | |
| Ret | 14 | Jo Bonnier | Cooper-Climax | 65 | Oil Pressure | 12 | |
| Ret | 9 | Dan Gurney | Brabham-Climax | 59 | Engine | 2 | |
| Ret | 26 | Ian Raby | Gilby-BRM | 59 | Gearbox | 19 | |
| Ret | 16 | Ian Burgess | Scirocco-BRM | 36 | Ignition | 20 | |
| Ret | 8 | Jack Brabham | Brabham-Climax | 27 | engine | 4 | |
| Ret | 11 | Innes Ireland | BRP-BRM | 26 | Ignition | 11 | |
| Ret | 5 | Trevor Taylor | Lotus-Climax | 23 | Fuel Pump | 10 | |
| Ret | 15 | Tony Settember | Scirocco-BRM | 20 | Ignition | 18 | |
| Ret | 6 | Bruce McLaren | Cooper-Climax | 6 | Engine | 6 |
Notes
- Pole position: Jim Clark - 1'34.4
- Fastest Lap: John Surtees - 1'36.0
| Previous race: 1963 French Grand Prix |
FIA Formula
One World Championship 1963 season |
Next race: 1963 German Grand Prix |
| Previous race: 1962 British Grand Prix |
British Grand Prix | Next race: 1964 British Grand Prix |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)



