Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Affirming a disjunct

 
Wikipedia: Affirming a disjunct

The logical fallacy of affirming a disjunct also known as the fallacy of the alternative disjunct or a false exclusionary disjunct occurs when a deductive argument takes the following logical form:

A or B
A
Therefore, it is not the case that B

Or in logical operators:

 p \vee q
p
{} \vdash {} ¬ q

Where {} \vdash {} denotes a logical assertion.

Contents

Explanation

The fallacy lies in concluding that one disjunct must be false because the other disjunct is true; in fact they may both be true. This results from "or" being defined inclusively rather than exclusively. Affirming the disjunct should not be confused with the valid form known as the disjunctive syllogism.

Counter Example

The following argument clearly indicates the invalidity of affirming a disjunct:

Max is a cat or Max is a mammal.
Max is a cat.
Therefore, Max is not a mammal.

This inference is obviously invalid. It is obvious that if Max is a cat, then Max is also a mammal. (Remember "or" is defined in an inclusive sense not an exclusive sense.)

See also

External links


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
 
 

 

Copyrights:

Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Affirming a disjunct" Read more