Alexander is a 2004 epic motion picture
film, based on the life of Alexander the Great. The film was directed by
Oliver Stone. According to Stone, the theatrical release is based on facts and historical
events.
The film was controversial and critically-derided on its release, and failed at the American box office, grossing only $34 million domestically, while costing $155 million to produce. It did
better internationally, however, grossing a total of $133 million in overseas revenues. [1]
Plot summary
The film is based on the biography of Alexander the Great, the Greek King of Macedon who managed to conquer almost the whole
world known to the Ancient Greeks. It gives a glimpse into some of the key moments of Alexander's youth, and his invasion of the
mighty Persian Empire, until his tragic death. It also outlined his life experience
during his youth, including his difficult relationship with his father Philip II of
Macedonia, the unification of the Greek city-states under the League of
Corinth, and the conquest of the Persian Empire in 331 BC as well as his new plans to
reform his empire, and the attempts made to reach the end of the world.
The storyline begins in 356 BC with Ptolemy I Soter,
who narrates the story throughout the film. In lavish sets and images Oliver Stone shows
his vision of Alexander's daily life in court of his father, Philip, and portraying the strained relationship between his
parents.
Alexander The Great rides into battle at Gaugamela.
Alexander grows up together with his mother Olympias and his tutor Aristotle where he finds interest in love, honour, music, exploration, poetry and military combat. He also
witnesses how his relationship with his father is destroyed and objects strenuously to his father's new marriage of
Attalus' niece, Eurydice.
Thereafter Philip is assassinated and Alexander becomes king of Greece, including
Macedon. After a brief mentioning of his punitive razing of Thebes and burning of
Persepolis, Ptolemy gives an overview of Alexander's west Persian campaign, including his declaration to be the son of Zeus by the
Oracle of Amun at Siwa Oasis,
his great battle against the Persian Emperor Darius III in the Battle of Gaugamela, and his eight year campaign at
Hydaspes against Porus in India (now
Pakistan), both of which are shown in the film.
The plot also illustrates Alexander's private relationship with his childhood friend, and lover, Hephaistion, and later his wife Roxana until his death.
Director's cut
Oliver Stone's director's cut was re-edited before the DVD release in later 2005.
Stone removed 17 minutes of footage, and added 9 minutes back into the film. This shortened the running time from 175 minutes to
167 minutes.
The differences between the "director's cut" version and the theatrical version
are:
- Dates in the flashbacks and flashforwards use normal historical figures such as 323 BC and 356 BC, as opposed to referring to
time lapses, i.e. "30 years earlier". In the commentary, Oliver Stone explained that for the theatrical release in the United
States he had to refrain from using regular "BC" dates, since (according to data collected
from test screenings) there was a significant number of viewers who did not know 356 BC was an earlier historical period than 323
BC
- Ptolemy's backstory at the beginning is shortened.
- The two flashbacks with the arrival of Eurydice to the court and the wedding feast are shifted into the eastern campaign,
enveloping the trial of Philotas and assassination of Parmenion.
- The scene with Aristotle (Christopher
Plummer) giving a lesson to young Alexander and his friends has been re-edited and extended by a few seconds.
- Ptolemy's narration leading to the Battle of Gaugamela has no reference to the razing of Thebes and burning of Persepolis. He
mentions the official Macedonian accusation, that Darius assisted the assassination of Philip (in both versions, it is also
mentioned when Alexander rallies the troops), and the proclamation by the Oracle of Amun is moved to later part of the
narration.
- There is no scene of the night before the Battle of Gaugamela, and the omen reader looking into the intestine of the
ox-sacrifice before the Battle.
- Directly after Alexander mourning the dead after the Battle of Gaugamela, there is an additional flashback with Philip
explaining the Titans to Alexander.
- In the theatrical, during Roxana's dance, Perdiccas can be seen breaking up a fight between Hephaistion and Cleitus, removed
in the Cut.
- The bedroom scene has been shortened. Roxana's attempt to kill Alexander (after her discovery of his relationship with
Hephaistion) was cut. More explicit footage of Alexander and Roxana having sex has also been added.
- When Alexander stumbles across the Page's Plot, the Cut features a scenelet in which Perdiccas goes to arrest Hermolaus, who
falls on his sword with the words, "death to all tyrants."
- There is no narrative explanation by Ptolemy during the trial of Philotas.
- There is no scene of Alexander mourning Cleitus.
- The flashback of Alexander questioning Olympias is not immediately after the flashback of Philip's assassination, but moved
after Alexander being badly wounded in the Battle of Hydaspes.
- The scene of Roxana being prevented from entering Alexander's tent by Hephaistion has been removed. This was the last remnant
of a Roxana/Cassander subplot that was filmed, but not included.
- Between the scene where Alexander smashes the "rebellion" within the ranks and the final battle, there is an additional scene
where Alexander reads a letter from Aristotle, with Christopher Plummer featured in the scene
dictating the letter to an unseen scribe.
- Ptolemy's narration of the march through the Gedrosian desert additionally mentions the helplessness of Alexander watching
his broken army die due to natural causes and harsh conditions in the desert, and he does not mention either Alexander's new
marriages in his final years, or that the march across the Gedrosian desert was the "worst blunder of his life." The scene of the
army returning to Babylon is also shortened.
- The scene of Olympias receiving the omen of Alexander's death is shortened.
Production details
Location
- Library of Alexandria – Shepperton Studios, London, England
- Pella/Babylon/Indian palaces and myths cave – Pinewood Studios, London,
England
- Alexandria (effect back plate) – Malta
- Temple of Pallas Athena, Mieza and Macedonian horse market – Essaouira, Morocco
- Gaugamela – desert near Marrakech, Morocco
- Babylon gates – Marrakech, Morocco
- Bactrian fortress – Lower Atlas Mountains, Morocco
- Hindu Kush (effect back plate) – Himalayas, India
- Macedonian amphitheater – Morocco
- Hyphasis – Mekong, northeastern Ubon Ratchathani
Province, Thailand.
- Hydaspes – Central Botanical Garden, Amphoe Mueang, Saraburi Province,
Thailand
Box Office totals
- Budget - US$ 155,000,000.00
- Total Domestic Grosses - US$ 34,297,191.00
- Total Overseas Grosses - US$ 133,001,001.00
- Total Worldwide Grosses - US$ 167,298,192.00
Film trivia
- In the first scenes with Ptolemy, Anthony Hopkins exchanges a look with a person with a similar beard, played by Elliot
Cowan. Contrary to belief and implication, this is not a glimpse of Ptolemy's life after the campaign, but his son,
Ptolemy II.
- There were two character subplots removed in the editing room: A Cassander/Roxana subplot which explained their fall from
grace in Alexander's eyes (cut for time), and a Hephaistion vs. Cleitus subplot (apparently thought too intense and complicated
to include). Both subplots were completely filmed, and appear in the extended version.
- The film was based mostly on the book Alexander the Great, which was written by historian Robin Lane Fox in the 1970s. He gave up his screen credit in return for being allowed to take part in the
epic cavalry charge during the film's recreation of the Battle of Gaugamela.
- In the scene where Alexander and Roxanna have sex (Director's Cut), there is a continuity error. At first Alexander is wearing shorts, they are clearly visible even when the two
are lying in the missionary position; however, in the next shot, the shorts are
missing and they are engaging in full sexual intercourse. They are obviously missing
as Alexander's buttocks are visible.
- Angelina Jolie, who played Alexander's mother Olympias, is just one year older than Colin Farrell.
Controversy
General controversy
Even prior to its release, there was controversy about the film's depiction of ancient Greek sexual mores. A group of 25 Greek
lawyers initially threatened to file a lawsuit against both Stone and the Warner Bros. film studio for what they claimed was an inaccurate portrayal of history. Yannis Varnakos
stated that "We are not saying that we are against gays, but we are saying that the
production company should make it clear to the audience that this film is pure fiction and not a true depiction of the life of
Alexander". After an advanced screening of the film, the lawyers announced that they would not pursue such a course of action
[1].
At the British premiere of the film, Stone blamed "raging fundamentalism in morality"
for the film's US box office failure [2]. He argued that American critics and audiences had blown the issue of sexuality out
of proportion [3].
The criticism prompted Stone to make significant changes to the film for its DVD release. Stone removed eight minutes, cutting
back his portrayal of homosexuality and adding new shots, like at the opening scene of Alexander dying. The DVD cover
characterizes the changes as making the film "faster paced, more action-packed."
Criticism by historians
With its attention to historical detail, Alexander also attracted critical scrutiny from historians; however, it often
had a quite opposite tendency than that has been voiced by general film critiques. Most academic criticism was concerned with the
insufficient adherence to historical details.
An anachronism appears at the very beginning of the film as well: A quote from Vergil's epic
poem, The Aeneid, "Fortune favors the bold" appears onscreen during the opening sequence.
Vergil was born around 70 BC, almost three hundred years after Alexander's time. Some[citation needed] consider this quotation inadequate
for the film.
Other major controversies came from Iranian (Persian) historians, who were upset by the film's renderings of Persians and
Macedonians alike. Kaveh Farrokh, an expert of Persian
history, says the portrayals of Persians and Macedonians in the film are inaccurate. As an example, in the movie,
Alexander the Great and his troops supposedly defeated the Persian army in a single battle, where Farrokh says that Alexander had
to fight several fierce battles against a large Persian Army, before he was even able to defeat Darius III, creating heavy doubts
in regards to the movies accuracy. Farrokh also stated that the "Macedonian forces are typically shown very organized,
disciplined, and so on, and what's very disturbing is when the so-called Persians are shown confronting the Macedonians, their
armies are totally disorganized. What is not known is that the Persians actually had uniforms. They marched in discipline, and
music was actually used such as trumpets and so on, to allow them to march in disciplined rank".
In addition to what some critics perceived as the movie's "down-playing of the Persians", King Darius is shown fleeing the
Gaugamela battle and abandoning his troops when approached by Alexander, where historians have pointed out from contemporary
Babylonian accounts that Darius tried to rally his army, but was abandoned by his troops.[2]
The final battle in India which is considered to be the one which changed Alexander's life forever is also inaccurately
depicted. The Indian opponent was the King Porous who had not lost against Alexander, according to modern findings. However a
story which is famous in India about Alexander is that, when Alexander won the battle in India, the Indian king was captured and
was presented before Alexander, Alexander asked "tell me what should I do with you?" the Indian King said," Do what any
victorious king does to the king who has lost in battle with him". Impressed by this reply Alexander befriends Porous
immediately. In spite of the bloody war, the Indians accept Alexander as a vital part of their history.
Criticism by film critics
One of the principal complaints among U.S. film critics was that "Alexander" resembled a history documentary more than an
action-drama film. As Roger Ebert wrote in his review, "we welcome the scenes of battle, pomp and circumstance because at least
for a time we are free of the endless narration of Ptolemy the historian". [[4]] The kindest criticism came from Daily Variety Magazine, published on November
21, 2004 where Todd McCarthy wrote that "Oliver Stone's 'Alexander' is at an honorable
failure, an intelligent and ambitious picture that crucially lacks dramatic flair and emotional involvement. Dry and academic
where Troy was vulgar and willfully a historical success." Manohla Dargis wrote in The New York Times that "Alexander"
"brought out the best of the worst in terms of inaccurate storytelling that lacks planning."
Extended version -- "Alexander Revisited"
Stone also made an extended version of "Alexander". In an interview with Ropeofsilicon.com, Stone stated that "I'm doing a
third version on DVD, not theatrical. I'm going to do a Cecile B Demille three hour
forty five minute thing, I'm going to go all out, put everything I like in the movie. He was a complicated man, it was a
complicated story and it doesn't hurt to make it longer and let people who loved the film and see it more and understand it
more."
The extended version of the film was released under the title of Alexander Revisited: The Final Unrated Cut on February
27, 2007. The two-disc set featured a new introduction by Stone. Says Stone, "Over the last two years I have been able to sort
out some of the unanswered questions about this highly complicated and passionate monarch -- questions I failed to answer
dramatically enough. This film represents my complete and last version, as it will contain all the essential footage we shot. I
don't know how many filmmakers have managed to make three versions of the same film, but I have been fortunate to have the
opportunity because of the success of video and DVD sales in the world, and I felt if I didn't do it now, with the energy and
memory I still have for the subject, it would never quite be the same again. For me, this is the complete Alexander, the clearest
interpretation I can offer.'"[5]
The film is restructured into three acts ("Seeds of the Man", "Introspection", and "Revolution") with an intermission.
Alexander: Revisited takes a more in-depth look at Alexander's life and his relationships with Olympias, Philip,
Hephaistion, Roxane and Ptolemy.
The film has a running time of 3 hours, 34 mins (214 minutes) and is presented in 2.40:1 anamorphic widescreen with English
Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround audio. Beyond the new introduction with director Oliver Stone there are no other confirmed extras,
except for a free coupon to the movie 300.[6]
Cast
Soundtrack
-
See also
References
External links
Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to:
Bibliography
- G. Abel, Hollywood Reporter 390 (2 August–8 August 2005), 11 (2005).
- R. K. Bosley,
"Warrior King", American Cinematographer 85:11, 36–40, 42–43, 45–46, 48–51 (2004); B. Bergery, "Timing Alexander", ibid.
44–45 (2004).
- T. Carver, "Oliver Stone's Alexander: Warner Bros. And Intermedia Films (2004)", Film & History 35:2, 83–84 (2005).
- G. Crowdus, "Dramatizing Issues That Historians Don't Address: An Interview with Oliver Stone", Cineaste 30:2 (Spring 2005), 12–23 (2005).
- D. Fierman, Entertainment Weekly 793 (19 November
2004), 26–32 (2004).
- M.
Fleming, "Stone Redraws Battle Plans: Producer Admit 'Alexander' Missteps, but Hope International Release Proves Epically
Successful", Variety 397:6 (27 December 2004–2 January 2005), 6 (2005).
- D. Gritten, "Fall Sneaks: Fearsome Phalanx: Executing His Vision Of Grandeur, Oliver Stone Leads A Front Line Of Powder-Keg
Actors Across 3 Continents. What Could Go Wrong?", Los Angeles Times 12 September 2004, E21 (2004).
- A. Lane, "The Critics: The Current Cinema: War-Torn: Oliver Stone's 'Alexander'", The New Yorker 80:38 (6 December 2004), 125–127 (2004).
- R. Lane Fox, Alexander the Great (Penguin Books, London, 1973).
- Mendelsohn, Daniel (January 13, 2005). "Alexander,
the Movie! [Review of Alexander, a film directed by Oliver Stone]". The New York Review of Books. ISSN 0028-7504.
- I.
Worthington, "Book Review: Europe: Ancient and Medieval: Alexander. Directed by Oliver Stone", The American Historical Review
110:2, 553 (2005).
- Radio Free Europe/Radio liberty,January 28, 2005 "World: Oliver Stone's 'Alexander' Stirs Up Controversy" By
Golnaz Esfandiari
- Dr. Kaveh Farrokh, The Alexander Movie: How are Iranians and Greeks Portrayed?
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
