Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Alexander of Pherae

 
 

Alexander (Alexandros). 1. Alexander of Pherae (in Thessaly), nephew and successor of Jason, tyrant of Pherae 369–358 BC. He was opposed by most of the cities of Thessaly and allied himself with Athens to counteract Theban expansion. When the Theban general Pelopidas visited him on one of his expeditions, he detained the general as a hostage until the latter was eventually rescued by a second Theban expedition in 367. As the result of a fresh appeal from Thessaly in 364, Pelopidas marched against him and defeated him at Cynoscephalae, but was himself killed. Later, a larger Theban army defeated Alexander and forced him to become the ally of the Thebans. In 362 he felt free to make piratical raids against Athens and raided the Piraeus. He was assassinated in 358 by his wife's brothers.

2. Alexander the Great, Alexander III of Macedon (356–323 BC), son of Philip II and Olympias of Epirus. He was educated by Aristotle and became king of Macedon in 336 upon the murder of his father. Before his death Philip had been about to lead an army against Persia in punishment for the wrongs inflicted on Greece in the Persian Wars 150 years earlier. Alexander aimed to continue this war, and in 334, after securing his position in Greece (rivals were put to death), he crossed the Hellespont into Asia to join the remnants of his father's advance army. He had a force of about 43, 000 men and a fleet of the Greek allies with about fifty warships.

He routed the Persian king Darius III at Issus (333) and captured his family, treating them with notable chivalry. In the following year he occupied Phoenicia (where the capture of the city of Tyre is regarded as his most brilliant military feat), Palestine, and Egypt, and after crushing the Persians again at Arbela (331), he sacked Persepolis (330), the ritual centre of their empire. (Alexander is said to have been incited to this act of destruction by the Greek courtesan Thais and to have later regretted it.) When Darius was murdered in 330, Alexander regarded himself as the legitimate ruler of the Persian empire, and between 330 and 327 he subdued vast tracts of the outlying areas of the empire—Hyrcania, Areia, Drangiana, Bactria, and Sogdiana.

In 327 he invaded northern India, and in 326 he crossed the Indus and reached the river Hydaspes (Jhelum). Here he fought his last great pitched battle to defeat the local king Porus and his formidable elephants. This was the last battle too for Bucephalas, Alexander's horse since childhood, which was wounded and died soon after the battle. Alexander advanced quite easily through the rest of the Punjab to the river Hyphasis (Sutlej) and contemplated proceeding across India to the Ganges but his army, exhausted by the monsoon as much as by the campaigning, refused to go further. He turned back, and in 323, at Babylon he fell suddenly ill at a drinking party, perhaps through fever, perhaps through poison, and after ten days died, aged 32. His body was finally brought to rest in Alexandria, where three centuries later his coffin was seen by the young emperor Augustus. It was probably destroyed in riots during the late third century AD.

Alexander is the greatest general of antiquity. This position he owes partly to the splendidly organized Macedonian army and its technically improved siege weapons, partly to his own versatile and intelligent strategy, but much more to qualities that were uniquely his: an unprecedented speed of movement, resolution in tackling the seemingly impossible, personal involvement in the dangers of battle and the rigours of campaigning, and a heroic sense of style in all that he did. To these qualities as well as to his generosity Alexander owed his ascendancy over the army. His most unusual characteristic was his double sympathy with the life styles of the Persians as well as the Greeks (his two wives—Roxana and Barsine—were Persian, and he encouraged his soldiers to follow his example). His desire to see Macedonians and Persians alike ruling his empire was not popular and may have been partly the cause of the various plots against his life.

Alexander clearly felt an intense concern for religion and showed scrupulous respect for local gods wherever he encountered them. In his lifetime he was widely acclaimed as divine, the son of Zeus, and he seems to have believed in his own divinity and to have been encouraged in this belief by his mother. Certainly he strove to emulate those other sons of gods, the Homeric heroes. His most lasting achievement was to extend the Greek language and institutions over the eastern world in such a way that he brought about an absolute break with the past. No region once conquered and settled by Alexander resumed its old ways uninfluenced by the conquest. The Greek city-states too never regained the independence that they lost with Philip. The centre of the (Hellenistic) Greek world shifted to Alexandria, and with that shift arose a new kind of Greek culture.

The principal extant authority for the history of Alexander's campaigns is the Anabasis of Arrian, who used as sources the writings, now lost, of Alexander's officers Ptolemy (later King Ptolemy I Soter of Egypt), Aristobulus of Cassandreia, and the sea-captain Nearchus, all of whom were sympathetic to Alexander. He may also have used Alexander's lost journal (Ephemerides), but some scholars doubt the existence of an authentic journal. There is also a tradition, which may be seen in the fragmentary history of Quintus Curtius, of writers hostile to Alexander, who represented him as a tyrant corrupted by power; most of them are of the Peripatetic (Aristotelian) School, whose hostility was natural enough after Callisthenes' death. Plutarch's Life is compiled from every kind of source, good and bad. The most influential tradition, however, stems from the narrative of Cleitarchus, written in the third century BC and known to us through the writings of Diodorus Siculus; Cleitarchus introduced the fabulous, an element that was further developed in the various Eastern versions of Alexander's life. From Latin versions supposedly translated from Callisthenes the legends passed into French poetry of the eleventh and twelfth centuries, thus giving the twelve-syllabled alexandrine line its name. There are two Old English works of the eleventh century based on the Latin legend, but it is from the French poems that the Alexander legends passed into the Middle English metrical romances such as ‘King Alisaunder’.

3. Alexander of Aphrodisias (flourished c. AD 200), the most important of the early commentators on Aristotle. Of his commentaries (in Greek) a few survive, and his works are widely quoted by later writers.

4. Alternative name for Paris (1).

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a word or phrase...
All Community Q&A Reference topics
 
Columbia Encyclopedia: Alexander of Pherae
Top
Alexander of Pherae (fēr'ē) , d. 358 B.C., tyrant of the city of Pherae in Thessaly after 369 B.C. He was opposed by other Thessalian cities and by the Thebans. Pelopidas failed (368 B.C.) in one expedition against him and was briefly imprisoned. Returning in 364 B.C., Pelopidas destroyed Alexander's power in the battle of Cynoscephalae, though he himself was killed. Alexander was murdered by members of his own family.
 
Wikipedia: Alexander of Pherae
Top

Alexander (Greek: Ἀλέξανδρος) was tagus or despot of Pherae in Thessaly, and ruled from 369 BC to 358 BC.[1]

Contents

Reign

The accounts of his usurpation vary somewhat in minor points. Diodorus Siculus tells us that on the assassination of his father, the tyrant Jason of Pherae, in 370 BC, his brother Polydorus ruled for a year, and was then poisoned by Alexander, another brother.[2] According to Xenophon, Polydorus was murdered by his brother Polyphron, and Polyphron, in 369 BC[3][4][5] murdered by Alexander--his nephew, according to Plutarch, who relates also that Alexander worshiped the spear with which he slew his uncle as if it was a god.[5][6] Alexander governed tyrannically, and according to Diodorus,[2] differently from the former rulers, but Polyphron, at least, seems to have set him the example.[3] The states of Thessaly, however, which had acknowledged the authority of Jason of Pherae,[2] were not so willing to submit to the oppression of Alexander the tyrant, and they applied therefore (and especially the old family of the Aleuadae of Larissa, who had most reason to fear him) to Alexander II of Macedon.

The tyrant, with his characteristic energy, prepared to meet his enemy in Macedonia, but the king anticipated him, and, reaching Larissa, was admitted into the city, obliged the Thessalian Alexander to flee to Pherae, and left a garrison in Larissa, as well as in Crannon, which had also come over to him.[2] But the Macedonian having retired, his friends in Thessaly feared the vengeance of Alexander, and sent for aid to Thebes, the policy of which was to check a neighbor who might otherwise become formidable, and Pelopidas was accordingly dispatched to aid them. On the arrival of the latter at Larissa, whence according to Diodorus he dislodged the Macedonian garrison, Alexander presented himself and offered submission; but soon after escaped by flight, alarmed by the indignation which Pelopidas expressed at the tales he heard of his cruelty and tyrannical profligacy.[7][8]

These events appear to be referable to the early part of the year 368 BC. In the summer of that year Pelopidas was again sent into Thessaly, in consequence of fresh complaints against Alexander. Accompanied by Ismenias, he went merely as a negotiator, and without any military force, and venturing incautiously within the power of the tyrant, was seized by him and thrown into prison.[8][9][10] The scholar William Mitford suggested that Pelopidas was taken prisoner in battle, but the language of Demosthenes hardly supports such an inference.[11][12] The Thebans sent a large army into Thessaly to rescue Pelopidas, but they could not keep the field against the superior cavalry of Alexander, who, aided by auxiliaries from Athens, pursued them with great slaughter; and the destruction of the whole Theban army is said to have been averted only by the ability of Epaminondas, who was serving in the campaign, but not as general.

The next year, 367 BC, was initiated by a specimen of Alexander's treacherous cruelty, in the massacre of the citizens of Scotussa;[8][9][13] and also by another expedition of the Thebans under Epaminondas into Thessaly, to rescue Pelopidas. According to Plutarch, Alexander did not dare offer resistance, and was glad to purchase even a thirty days' truce by the delivery of the prisoners.[8][9] During the next three years Alexander would seem to have renewed his attempts against the states of Thessaly, especially those of Magnesia and Phthiotis,[8] for at the end of that time, 364 BC, we find them again applying to Thebes for protection against him. The army appointed to march under Pelopidas is said to have been dismayed by an eclipse (on June 13, 364), and Pelopidas, leaving it behind, entered Thessaly at the head of three hundred volunteer horsemen and some mercenaries. A battle ensued at Cynoscephalae, wherein Pelopidas was himself slain, but defeated Alexander;[8][14] and this victory was closely followed by another of the Thebans under Malcites and Diogiton, who obliged Alexander to restore the conquered towns to the Thessalians, to confine himself to Pherae, to join the Boeotian League, and to be a dependent ally of Thebes.[3][8][14]

If the death of Epaminondas in 362 BC freed Athens from fear of Thebes, it appears at the same time to have exposed her to further aggression from Alexander, who made a piratical raid on Tinos and other cities of the Cyclades, plundering them, and making slaves of the inhabitants. He besieged Peparethus too, and "even landed troops in Attica itself, and seized the port of Panormus, a little eastward of Sounion." Leosthenes, the Athenian admiral, defeated him, and relieved Peparethus, but Alexander delivered his men from a blockade in Panormus, took several Attic triremes, and plundered the Piraeus.[5][15][16][17][18]

Death

The murder of Alexander is assigned by Diodorus to 367 BC. Plutarch gives a detailed account of it, containing a lively picture of the palace. Guards watched throughout it all the night, except at Alexander's bedchamber, which was situated at the top of a ladder, and at the door of which a ferocious dog was chained. Thebe, Alexander's wife and cousin (or half-sister, as the daughter of Jason of Pherae),[8] concealed her three brothers in the house during the day, caused the dog to be removed when Alexander had gone to rest, and having covered the steps of the ladder with wool, brought up the young men to her husband's chamber. Though she had taken away Alexander's sword, they feared to set about the deed until she threatened to wake him. Her brothers then entered and killed Alexander. His body was cast into the streets, and exposed to every indignity.

Of Thebe's motive for the murder different accounts are given. Plutarch states it to have been fear of her husband, together with hatred of his cruel and brutal character, and ascribes these feelings principally to the representations of Pelopidas, when she visited him in his prison. In Cicero the deed is ascribed to jealousy. Other accounts have it that Alexander had taken Thebe's youngest brother as his eromenos and tied him up. Exasperated by his wife's pleas to release the youth, he murdered the boy, which drove her to revenge. [8][19][20][21][22][23]

References

  1. ^ Elder, Edward (1867). "Alexander of Pherae". in William Smith. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. 1. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. pp. 124-125. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moa;cc=moa;idno=acl3129.0001.001;q1=numenius;size=l;frm=frameset;seq=139. 
  2. ^ a b c d Diodorus Siculus, xv. 60-61
  3. ^ a b c Xenophon, Hellenica vi. 4. ~ 34
  4. ^ This date is at variance with Pausanias (vi. 5)
  5. ^ a b c Wesseling, On Diodorus Siculus xv. 75
  6. ^ Plutarch, Pelop. p. 293, &c.
  7. ^ Diodorus Siculus, xv. 67
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i Plutarch, Pelop. p. 291-297, d.
  9. ^ a b c Diodorus Siculus, xv. 71-75
  10. ^ Polybius, viii. 1
  11. ^ Demosthenes, Against Aristocrates p. 660
  12. ^ William Mitford, History of Greece ch. 27. sec. 5
  13. ^ Pausanias, Description of Greece vi. 5
  14. ^ a b Diodorus Siculus, xv. 80
  15. ^ Diodorus Siculus, xv. 95
  16. ^ Polyaenus, vi. 2
  17. ^ Demosthenes, c. Polycl. pp. 1207-1208
  18. ^ Connop Thirlwall, History of Greece vol. v. p. 209
  19. ^ Diodorus Siculus, xvi. 14
  20. ^ Xenophon, Hellenica vi. 4. ~ 37
  21. ^ Cicero, De Officiis 7
  22. ^ Cicero, De Inventione ii. 49
  23. ^ Aristot. ap. Cicero de Div. i. 25; the dream of Eudemus

Other sources


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Classical Literature Companion. The Concise Oxford Companion to Classical Literature. Copyright © 1993, 2003 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Alexander of Pherae" Read more