|
|
This article may contain original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding references. Statements consisting only of original research may be removed. More details may be available on the talk page. (November 2010) |
|
|
This article may contain improper references to self-published sources. Please help improve it by removing references to unreliable sources, where they are used inappropriately. (November 2010) |
The succession to the Crown of the United Kingdom is currently determined by the Act of Settlement 1701, which enacted that, should William III and Anne both die without issue (as, in the event, they did), the crown would be settled on Sophia of Hanover (a granddaughter of King James VI and I ) and her Protestant heirs. The Crown has passed according to this law ever since, save an amendment passed in 1936 that any descendants of Edward VIII would have no claim whatsoever to the Crown. History has rendered this amendment academic, as the abdicated King Edward VIII died without issue in 1972; if he had not abdicated and the amendment had not been passed, at that point his niece (the present Queen) would have succeeded anyway as Elizabeth II.
Concomitantly, British history provides several opportunities for alternative claimants to the Crown to arise, and historical scholars have on occasion traced to present times the heirs of those alternative claims (although such historical speculation necessarily assumes that all parties involved would still have married the same people and had the same children).
Throughout this article, the names of the historical monarchs appear in bold and the names of "would-have-been" monarchs are in italics.
|
Contents
|
This line’s claim to the Crown is based upon the argument that Edward IV was not sired by Richard Plantagenet, 3rd Duke of York, and thus had no legitimate claim to the Crown.[1] Therefore, when Richard was killed at the Battle of Wakefield, his claim passed to his eldest legitimate son, Edmund, Earl of Rutland. Unfortunately, Edmund was captured at the same battle and executed either the same or next day. Edmund’s claim then passed to his eldest "legitimate" brother and heir presumptive, George, Duke of Clarence. Supporters of the Clarence claim also draw on the debated validity of Edward IV’s marriage to Elizabeth Woodville, which allows them to argue that, even if Edward was legitimate, his children were not. Another point is that Henry VI passed a law in 1470, that should both he and his son Edward of Westminster die without further legitimate issue, the crown was to pass to Clarence, as Henry had placed an attainder upon Edward IV. When Henry was killed in 1471 (Prince Edward having died in battle shortly before), Clarence (who could claim descent from John of Gaunt, as could his wife Isabella Neville) became the legal heir to Henry VI and the House of Lancaster.[2]
| Alternative Succession of Royal Houses Descendants of George, Duke of Clarence[1] Map of Succession |
|---|
| House of Plantagenet |
| Edward III • Richard II |
| House of Mortimer |
| Edmund I |
| House of Plantagenet (Yorkist Reunion) |
| Richard III • Edmund II • George I • Edward IV |
| House of Pole |
| Henry IV • Henry V |
| House of Hastings |
| Henry VI • George II • Henry VII • Ferdinando • Theophilus I • George III • Theophilus II • Francis I |
| House of Rawdon |
| Francis II • George IV • Paulyn • Henry VIII |
| House of Clifton |
| Charles |
| House of Huddleston |
| Ian |
| House of Lord |
| Michael |
The current descendant of this line is Michael Abney-Hastings, 14th Earl of Loudoun. His royal lineage is as follows:
Note: The list of succession (right) excludes females from the crown. The precedent for female inheritance of the Crown would not have been set had George, Duke of Clarence inherited the crown. The principle that a woman could reign was only laid down by Henry VIII when he named Mary I as heir to the throne in 1525, and approved by Parliament by the First Succession Act which appointed Elizabeth I as heir.[citation needed] This line does, however, maintain the precedent of the right of a male to inherit via female line set by the succession of Henry II after he reclaimed the usurped crown from his cousin Stephen.[citation needed]
Henry VIII’s Third Succession Act granted Henry the right to bequeath the Crown in his Will. His Will specified that, in default of heirs to his children, the throne was to pass to the heirs of his younger sister Mary Tudor, Queen of France, bypassing the line of his elder sister Margaret Tudor, represented by the Catholic Mary, Queen of Scots. Edward VI confirmed this by letters patent. The legitimate and legal heir of Elizabeth I was therefore Anne Stanley, Countess of Castlehaven (the marriage of Lady Catherine Grey having been annulled, and her children declared illegitimate, by Elizabeth I).[3]
| Alternative Succession of Royal Houses Descendants of Mary Tudor Map of Succession |
|---|
| House of Tudor |
| Henry VII • Henry VIII • Edward VI • Mary • Elizabeth I |
| House of Stanley |
| Anne |
| House of Brydges |
| George I • Margaret |
| House of Skipwith |
| George II |
| House of Doughty |
| Henry IX • Henry X • Elizabeth II |
| House of Villiers |
| George III • George IV • Victor • George V • George VI • Caroline |
Her succession, under this theory, follows:
Since Lady Anne Stanley’s line is thought to have become extinct with the death of Elizabeth Doughty, the line then passes to the descendants of Lady Anne's sister, Lady Frances Stanley:
Although the 9th Earl of Jersey had sons from a third marriage, he had been divorced from his first wife, who was still alive when he married his third. Under a strict adherence to the succession laws and customs as they existed in 1603, it is argued that no laws passed by Parliament since 1603 are legitimate, as the heirs did not summon those Parliaments, nor did those laws receive the royal assent to become law. Under the law as it stood in 1603, the 9th Earl of Jersey’s divorce was not valid, and therefore both his remarriage during his ex-wife's lifetime was null and void, and the children of his third marriage illegitimate. Consequently, the current holder of the Stanley claim to the throne of England is the only child of the 9th Earl’s first marriage, Lady Caroline Ogilvy (née Child Villiers).[4] By a twist of fate her husband's family are themselves highly ranked in the (accepted) line of succession to the British throne, with Lady Caroline's nephew James Ogilvy being fortieth in line.
The current line, passed over by the Act of Settlement 1701, inherited their claim to the Crowns of England and Scotland from the deposed James II of England via his youngest sister Henrietta Anne Stuart.[citation needed]
At Henry's death the claim passed to his second cousin twice removed, Charles Emmanuel IV of Sardinia, and then to his brother Victor Emmanuel I of Sardinia. Charles Emmanuel and Victor Emmanuel were great-great-great-grandsons of King Charles I.[5]
| Alternative Succession of Royal Houses Descendants of Henrietta Anne Stuart Jacobite Succession |
|---|
| House of Stuart |
| Mary II • James I • Charles I • Charles II • James II • James III • Charles III • Henry IX |
| House of Savoy |
| Charles IV • Victor • Mary III[6] |
| House of Habsburg |
| Francis I • Mary IV |
| House of Wittelsbach |
| Robert • Albert • Francis II |
When Franz dies, his claim on the English and Scottish crowns[7] will pass to his younger brother Max.
On 28 October 2011, during the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Perth, Australia, it was announced that British Prime Minister David Cameron's proposed changes to the royal succession laws in the 16 Commonwealth realms had received unanimous support of the other realms' prime ministers. The alterations would replace male preference primogeniture — under which sons take precedence over daughters in the lines of succession — with absolute primogeniture for descendants of the current Prince of Wales; end the ban on marriage of dynasts to Catholics; and limit the requirement for those in line to the throne to acquire permission of the sovereign to marry. However, the requirement for the sovereign to be in communion with the Church of England would remain. The Queen, Elizabeth II, is said to support the proposed changes.
If this system of primogeniture was applied during the reign of Victoria, in which the throne was inherited by her eldest son but second eldest child, Edward VII, Princess Victoria, Princess Royal would be the queen and will be inherited by her eldest child and so on.[8][9][10]
Friederike is not considered a pretender to the British throne as this alternative line of succession is only a presumed line if equal primogeniture took effect during the reign of Queen Victoria. Next in line is her eldest child, Felicitas Catharini Malina Johanna von Reiche.
On the death of Queen Anne, the throne was inherited by George I. George I was king of Hanover in which the house name was derived, House of Hanover. Great Britain and Ireland follows male primogeniture while Hanover follows Salic law in succession to the throne. The monarchs of Great Britain and Ireland and Hanover were the same from George I until William IV, as these kings were succeeded by males. During the reign of William IV, his heiress presumptive to the British throne was Princess Victoria of Kent, his niece, while his heir apparent to the Hanoverian throne was Ernest Augustus I, his younger brother. On William IV's death, the personal union of Great Britain and Hanover ended. Princess Victoria did not inherit the Hanoverian throne because she was female. Salic law prevented females inheriting the throne.
This is only a presumed line. The heir apparent of Ernest Augustus V is Prince Ernest Augustus Andrew Philip Constantine Maximilian Rolf Stephen Louis Rudolph
Another presumed line is during the reign of George VI. This was nearly impossible at that time. If Salic law was applied to the law of succession, neither Princess Elizabeth nor her younger sister Princess Margaret could have inherited the throne, as they were female.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)