In mathematics, an amenable group is a locally compact topological group G carrying a kind of averaging operation on bounded functions that is invariant under translation by group elements. The original definition, in terms of a finitely additive invariant measure (or mean) on subsets of G, was introduced by John von Neumann in 1929 under the German name "messbar" ("measurable" in English) in response to the Banach–Tarski paradox. In 1949 Mahlon M. Day introduced the English translation "amenable", apparently as a pun.[1]
The amenability property has a large number of equivalent formulations. In the field of analysis, the definition is in terms of linear functionals. An intuitive way to understand this version is that the support of the regular representation is the whole space of irreducible representations.
In discrete group theory, where G has no topological structure, a simpler definition is used. In this setting, a group is amenable if one can say what percentage of G any given subset takes up.
If a group has a Følner sequence then it is automatically amenable.
|
Contents
|
Let
be a locally compact hausdorff group. Then it is well known that it possesses a unique, up-to-scale left- (or right-) rotation invariant ring (borel regular in the case of
second countable) measure (left and right probability measure in the case of
compact), the Haar measure. Consider the banach space
of essentially-bounded measurable functions within this measure space (which is clearly independent of the scale of the Haar measure).
Definition 1. A linear functional
is said to be a mean if
has norm 1 and is non-negative (i.e.
a.e. implies
).
Definition 2. A mean
is said to be a left-invariant (resp. right-invariant) if
all
with respect to the left (resp. right) shift action of
(resp.
).
Definition 3. A locally compact hausdorff group is called amenable if it admits a left- (or right-)invariant mean.
The definition of amenability is quite a lot simpler in the case of a discrete group, i.e. a group with no topological structure.
Definition. A discrete group G is amenable if there is a finitely additive measure (also called a mean) —a function that assigns to each subset of G a number from 0 to 1—such that
This definition can be summarized thus:G is amenable if it has a finitely-additive left-invariant probability measure. Given a subset A of G, the measure can be thought of as answering the question: what is the probability that a random element of G is in A?
It is a fact that this definition is equivalent to the definition in terms of L∞(G).
Having a measure
on G allows us to define integration of bounded functions on G. Given a bounded function
, the integral

is defined as in Lebesgue integration. (Note that some of the properties of the Lebesgue integral fail here, since our measure is only finitely additive.)
If a group has a left-invariant measure, it automatically has a bi-invariant one. Given a left-invariant measure
, the function
is a right-invariant measure. Combining these two gives a bi-invariant measure:

The following conditions are equivalent for a countable discrete group Γ:
If a countable discrete group contains a (non-abelian) free subgroup on two generators, then it is not amenable. The converse to this statement is the so-called von Neumann conjecture, which was disproved by Olshanskii in 1980 using his Tarski monsters. Adyan subsequently showed that free Burnside groups are non-amenable: since they are periodic, they cannot contain the free group on two generators. These groups are finitely generated, but not finitely presented. However, in 2002 Sapir and Olshanskii found finitely presented counterexamples: non-amenable finitely presented groups that have a periodic normal subgroup with quotient the integers.[2]
For finitely generated linear groups, however, the von Neumann conjecture is true by the Tits alternative[3]: every subgroup of GL(n,k) with k a field either has a normal solvable subgroup of finite index (and therefore is amenable) or contains the free group on two generators. Although Tits' proof used algebraic geometry, Guivarc'h later found an analytic proof based on V. Oseledets' multiplicative ergodic theorem.[4] Analogues of the Tits alternative have been proved for many other classes of groups, such as fundamental groups of 2-dimensional simplicial complexes of non-positive curvature.[5]
This article incorporates material from Amenable group on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)