The American Federation of Labor (AFL) was one of the first federations of labor unions in the United States. It was
founded in Columbus, Ohio in 1886 by Samuel Gompers as a reorganization of its predecessor, the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions. Gompers was the
president of the AFL until his death in 1924.
The AFL was the largest union grouping in the United States for the first half of the twentieth century, even after the
creation of the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) by
unions that left the AFL in 1938 over its opposition to organizing mass production industries.
While the union was founded and dominated by craft unions throughout the first fifty
years of its existence, many of its craft union affiliates turned to organizing on an industrial basis to meet the challenge from the CIO in the 1940s.
The AFL represented a conservative "pure and simple unionism" that stressed foremost the concern with working conditions, pay
and control over jobs, relegating political goals to a minor role.[1] Unlike the Socialist Party or the even
more radical Industrial Workers of the World, it saw the capitalist
system as the path to betterment of labor. The AFL's "business unionism" favored pursuit of workers' immediate demands, rather
than challenging the rights of owners under capitalism, and took a pragmatic, and often
pessimistic, view of politics that favored tactical support for particular politicians over formation of a party devoted to
workers' interests.
Early years
The AFL was formed in large part because of the dissatisfaction of many trade union leaders with the Knights of Labor, an organization that contained many trade unions and which had played a leading role
in some of the largest strikes of the era, but whose leadership had supported several
rival unions that had bargained for lower wages and provided strikebreakers during
other unions' strikes. The new AFL distinguished itself from the Knights by emphasizing the autonomy of each trade union
affiliated with it and limiting membership to workers and organizations made up of workers, unlike the Knights who, according to
their producerist philosophy, also admitted small employers as members.
The AFL grew steadily in the late nineteenth century while the Knights went into decline. The Knights lost a series of large
strikes which cost the organization many members. Employer opposition rose (particularly after the Haymarket Riot and Great Southwest Railroad
Strike of 1886), and the organizational structure of the Knights was unsuited to withstanding and countering this
opposition. Conflict between the rank and file and leadership in the Knights also worsened. But conflict with the AFL also
contributed to the Knights' demise as the trade union federation raided the Knights, affiliated trade unions which had been
expelled from the Knights, and challenged the Knights for the right to represent workers.[2]
Although Gompers at first advocated a form of industrial unionism, he retreated from such an evolutionary shift in the face of
opposition from the craft unions that made up most of the AFL. The emphasis on craft unionism also made it difficult for the AFL
to put its egalitarian principles into practice: while the AFL did not willfully exclude workers on the basis of their race or
nationality, and refused to grant charters to those unions that formally excluded African-Americans, its emphasis on representing skilled workers excluded most blacks by default.
However, in 1895, that policy of egalitarianism also gave way when the AFL admitted the
International Association of Machinists.
The new affiliate was a merger of one organization which the AFL had previously refused to admit, and the rival union that the
AFL had previously chartered. The merged union discriminated against black workers.
The AFL then sanctioned creation of segregated locals within its affiliates — particularly in the construction and railroad
industries — which actively excluded black workers altogether from union membership, and from employment in the industries they
had organized. The AFL also actively supported legislation, such as literacy tests, that would reduce unskilled immigration from
Eastern and Southern Europe.
In 1901, the AFL lobbied Congress to reauthorize the 1882
Chinese Exclusion Act, and issued a pamphlet entitled "Some
reasons for Chinese exclusion. Which shall survive?" The AFL also began one of the first organized labor boycotts when they began putting white stickers on the cigars made by unionized, white cigar rollers while
simultaneously discouraging consumers from purchasing cigars rolled by Chinese workers.
Expansion and competition
The AFL was left as the only major national union body after the demise of the Knights of Labor in the 1890s. It subsequently brought in a number of unions formed on industrial union lines, including the
United Mine Workers, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union and the United Brewery Workers. Even so,
the craft unions within the AFL maintained power within the Federation.
The AFL made efforts in its early years to assist its affiliates in organizing: it advanced funds or provided organizers or,
in some cases, such as the International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, the Teamsters and the American Federation of Musicians, helped form the union. The AFL also used its
influence (including refusal of charters or expulsion) to heal splits within affiliated unions, to force separate unions seeking
to represent the same or closely related jurisdictions to merge, or to mediate disputes between rival factions where both sides
claimed to represent the leadership of an affiliated union or one seeking affiliation. The AFL also chartered "federal unions"—local unions not affiliated with any international union—in those fields
in which no affiliate claimed jurisdiction.
The AFL faced its first major reversal when employers launched an open shop movement in
1903 designed to drive unions out of construction, mining, longshore and other industries. At the
same time, employers discovered the efficacy of labor injunctions, first used with great
effect by the Cleveland administration during the Pullman strike in 1894. While the AFL sought to outlaw "yellow-dog contracts," to limit the courts' power to impose "government by injunction" and to obtain
exemption from the antitrust laws that were being used to criminalize labor organizing,
the courts reversed what few legislative successes the labor movement won.
While the AFL together with its offspring, the AFL-CIO have comprised the longest lasting and
most influential labor federation in the United States, there have been other entities which offered competition. Sometimes the competition has been
subsumed through mergers or evolution, other times the actions of government have played a significant role. Competition has come
from organizations large and small, but some of the most notable organizations have included the Western Federation of Miners (WFM); the Western Labor
Union (WLU), which was later renamed the American Labor Union (ALU); the
Industrial Workers of the World (IWW); the CIO; and, after the AFL merged with the CIO, the Change to Win Federation.
Conflicts between affiliated unions
-
From the outset, unions affiliated with the AFL found themselves in conflict when both unions claimed jurisdiction over the
same groups of workers: both the Brewers and Teamsters claimed to represent beer truck drivers, both the Machinists and the
International Typographical Union claimed to represent certain
printroom employees, and the Machinists and a fledgling union known as the "Carriage, Wagon and Automobile Workers Union" sought
to organize the same employees — even though neither union had made any effort to organize or bargain for those employees. In
some cases the AFL mediated the dispute, usually favoring the larger or more influential union. The AFL often reversed its
jurisdictional rulings over time, as the continuing jurisdictional battles between the Brewers and the Teamsters showed. In other
cases the AFL expelled the offending union, as it did in 1913 in the case of the Carriage, Wagon
and Automobile Workers Union (which quickly disappeared).
These jurisdictional disputes were most frequent in the building trades, where a number of different unions might claim the
right to have work assigned to their members. The craft unions in this industry organized their own department within the AFL in
1908, despite the reservations of Gompers and other leaders about creation of a separate body
within the AFL that might function as a federation within a federation. While those fears were partly borne out in practice, as
the Building Trades Department did acquire a great deal of practical power gained through resolving jurisdictional disputes
between affiliates, the danger that it might serve as the basis for schism never materialized.
Affiliates within the AFL formed "departments" to help resolve these jurisdictional conflicts and to provide a more effective
voice for member unions in given industries. The Metal Trades
Department engaged in some organizing of its own, primarily in shipbuilding, where unions such as the Pipefitters, Machinists and Iron Workers joined together
through local metal workers' councils to represent a diverse group of workers. The Railway Employees
Department dealt with both jurisdictional disputes between affiliates and pursued a common legislative agenda for all of
them. Even that sort of structure did not prevent AFL unions from finding themselves in conflict on political issues. For
example, the International Seamen's Union opposed passage of a law applying
to workers engaged in interstate transport that railway unions supported. The AFL bridged these differences on an ad hoc
basis.
The AFL also encouraged the formation of local labor bodies (known as central labor councils) in major metropolitan areas in
which all of the affiliates could participate. These local labor councils acquired a great deal of influence in some cases. For
example, the Chicago Federation of Labor spearheaded efforts to organize
packinghouse and steel workers during and immediately after World War I. Local
building trades councils also became powerful in some areas. In San Francisco,
the local Building Trades Council, led by Carpenters official P. H. McCarthy, not only
dominated the local labor council but helped elect McCarthy mayor of San Francisco in 1909. In a
very few cases early in the AFL's history, state and local bodies defied AFL policy or chose to disaffiliate over policy
disputes.
Political activities
While the organization was founded by socialists such as Gompers and Peter J. McGuire, it quickly became more conservative. The AFL adopted a philosophy of "business
unionism" that emphasized unions' contribution to businesses' profits and national economic growth. The business unionist
approach also focused on skilled workers' immediate job-related interests, while ignoring larger political issues.
The AFL showed no interest in supporting a labor party and found itself in conflict with the socialist organizations of the
day. It resolved in 1894 not to affiliate itself with any political party, and distanced itself
from the Socialist Labor Party headed by Daniel De Leon.
In some respects the AFL leadership took a pragmatic view toward politicians, following Gompers' slogan to "reward your
friends and punish your enemies" without regard to party affiliation. Over time, after repeated disappointments with the failure
of labor's legislative efforts to protect workers' rights, which the courts had struck down as unconstitutional, Gompers became
almost anti-political, opposing some forms of protective legislation, such as limitations on working hours, because they would
detract from the efforts of unions to obtain those same benefits through collective
bargaining.
The AFL concentrated its political efforts during the last decades of the Gompers administration on securing freedom from
state control of unions — in particular an end to the court's use of labor injunctions to block the right to organize or strike
and the application of the anti-trust laws to criminalize labor's use of pickets, boycotts and
strikes. The AFL thought that it had achieved the latter with the passage of the Clayton
Antitrust Act in 1914 — which Gompers referred to as "Labor's Magna Carta". But in Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering,
254 U.S. 443 (1921), the United States Supreme Court narrowly read the Act and codified the federal courts'
existing power to issue injunctions rather than limit it. The court read the phrase "between an employer and employees"
(contained in the first paragraph of the Act) to refer only to cases involving an employer and its own employees, leaving the
courts free to punish unions for engaging in sympathy strikes or secondary boycotts.
The AFL's pessimistic attitude towards politics did not, on the other hand, prevent affiliated unions from pursuing their own
agendas. Construction unions supported legislation that governed entry of contractors into the industry and protected workers'
rights to pay, rail and mass production industries sought workplace safety legislation, and unions generally agitated for the
passage of workers' compensation statutes.
Unions, including the AFL itself, also welcomed governmental intervention in favor of collective bargaining during World War
I. Unions in the packinghouse industry were able to form due to governmental pressure on the largest employers to recognize the
unions rather than face a strike. The AFL endorsed the 1924
Presidential campaign of Robert M. La Follette, Sr., and the railroad
unions' Conference for Progressive Political Action
supported the Socialist Party. The campaign failed to establish a permanent
Progressive Party, and thereafter the Federation embraced the Democratic
Party even though many union leaders remained Republicans.
Some unions within the AFL also helped form and participated in the National Civic
Federation. The National Civic Federation was formed by several progressive employers who sought to avoid labor disputes
by fostering collective bargaining and "responsible" unionism. Labor's participation in this federation, at first tentative,
created internal division within the AFL. Socialists, who believed the only way to help workers was to destroy capitalism,
denounced any cooperation with capitalists in the National Civic Federation. The AFL nonetheless continued its association with
the group, even after the National Civic Federation became much less important after 1915.
The AFL relaxed its rigid stand against legislation after the death of Gompers. Even so, it remained cautious. Its proposals
for unemployment benefits (made in the late 1920s) were too modest to have practical value, as the
Great Depression soon showed. The impetus for the major federal
labor laws of the 1930s came from the New Deal. The enormous
growth in union membership came after Congress passed the National Industrial
Recovery Act in 1933 and National Labor
Relations Act in 1935. The AFL refused to sanction or participate in the mass strikes led by
John L. Lewis of the United Mine Workers and other left unions such as the
Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America. After the AFL expelled
the CIO in 1936, the CIO undertook a major organizing effort. The AFL responded with its own
massive organizing drive that kept its membership totals 50 percent higher than the CIO's.
The AFL retained close ties to the Democratic machines in big cities through the 1940s. Its
membership surged during the war and it held on to most of its new members after wartime legal support for labor was removed.
The AFL was not able to block the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947.
In 1955, the AFL and CIO reunited as the AFL-CIO under
George Meany.
Presidents of the American Federation of Labor, 1886-1955
See also
Notes
- ^ Currarino 2006
- ^ Foner, History of the Labor Movement in the United States. Vol. 2: From
the Founding of the American Federation of Labor to the Emergence of American Imperialism, 1955, pp. 157-170.
References
Additional primary sources
- American Federation of Labor. Some reasons for Chinese exclusion. Meat vs. rice. American manhood against Asiatic
coolieism. Which shall survive? Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Labor, 1901.
- Gompers, Samuel. Seventy Years of Life and Labor: An Autobiography. Nick Salvatore, ed. Rev. and reprinted ed. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984 (originally published 1925). ISBN 0875461123online edition
- The Samuel Gompers Papers guide index vol 1-10, to
1918
Additional secondary sources
- Bornet, Vaughn Davis. Labor Politics in a Democratic Republic. Washington, D.C.: Spartan Books, 1964.
- Brooks, George W.; Derber, Milton; McCabe, David A.; and Taft, Philip, eds. Interpreting the Labor Movement. Madison,
Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1952. online
- Commons, John R, et al. History of Labour in the United States, Vol. II., 1860-1896, New York City: Macmillan and Co.,
1918.online edition
- Currarino, Rosanne. "The Politics of 'More': The Labor Question and the Idea of Economic Liberty in Industrial America."
Journal of American History. 93:1 (June 2006).abstract
- Dubofsky, Melvyn and Van Tine, Warren. John L. Lewis: A Biography. Reprint ed. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois
Press, 1992. ISBN 081290673X
- Foner, Philip S. History of the Labor Movement in the United States. Vol. 2: From the Founding of the American Federation
of Labor to the Emergence of American Imperialism. New York: International Publishers, 1955. Cloth ISBN 0-7178-0092-X;
Paperback ISBN 0-7178-0388-0
- Galenson, Walter. The CIO Challenge to the AFL: A History of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press, 1960. ISBN 0674131509 online edition
- Greene, Julie. Pure and Simple Politics: The American Federation of Labor and Political Activism, 1881-1917. New York
City: Cambridge University Press, 1998. ISBN 0521433983online edition
- Karson, Marc. American Labor Unions and Politics, 1900-1918. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press,
1958.online edition
- Lee, R. Alton. Truman and Taft-Hartley: A Question of Mandate. Lexington, Ky.: University of Kentucky Press,
1966.online edition
- McCartin, Joseph A. Labor's Great War: The Struggle for Industrial Democracy and the Origins of Modern American Labor
Relations, 1912-21. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1997. ISBN 0-8078-4679-1online edition
- Mandel, Bernard. Samuel Gompers: A Biography. Yellow Springs, Ohio: Antioch Press, 1963.online edition
- Orth, Samuel Peter. The Armies of Labor: A Chronicle of the Organized Wage-Earners. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University
Press, 1919.online edition
- Taft, Philip. The A.F. of L. in the Time of Gompers. Hardback reprint. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1957. ISBN
0-374-97734-8
- Taft, Philip. The A.F. of L. From the Death of Gompers to the Merger. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1959.
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
